Systematic errors reduction

Chapter 8, A Systematic Approach to the Management of Human Error, explains how the manager and safety professional can use human factors principles in the management of process safety. This chapter also provides a practical plan for a plant human error reduction program that will improve productivity and quality as well. 

An additional reason for investing resources in error reduction measures is to improve the ability of the industry to conform to regulatory standards. It is likely that as the relationship between hximan error and safety becomes more widely recognized, regulatory authorities will place more emphasis on the reduction of error-inducing conditions in plants. It is therefore important that the Chemical Process Industries take the lead in developing a systematic approach and a defensible position in this area. 

The preceding analysis neglects the fact that for very fast follow-up reactions, transformation of B into C may take place within the solvent cage before separation of B and P (Scheme 2.14). The ensuing systematic error is an increasing function of kc but does not exceed +30 mV for rate constants as high as 1011 M-1 s-1.21 Typical examples concern the reductive cleavage of chloro- and bromobenzenes and pyridines.22... 

Prior knowledge allows to include fixed relations between some of the four parameters (amplitude, phase, frequency position, peak width) describing a symmetrical well-shaped resonance. Signal ratios, chemical shift difierences, linewidth relations and zero-order phase relations can be included. The reduction of the number of unknown parameters leads to a reduced calculation time, better convergence behaviour and improved results. However, the assumptions made to include the prior knowledge must be validated for each experiment. Differences between the parameter values set by the prior knowledge and the actual parameters could lead to systematic errors. 

Reductive elimination and oxidative addition are ubiquitous reaction steps in many TM-catalyzed processes. A recent study by Beste and Frenking (82) may serve as example for the general finding that relative energies of TM complexes with different coordination numbers may be subject to systematic errors at the DFT level of theory. Table 16 shows calculated energies at the CCSD(T)/n level and at B3LYP using three different basis sets, II-IV, for platinum complexes... 

However, wide systematic investigations in molten salts require unified experimental techniques which provide a reduction in the data-spreads which arise from the systematic errors characteristic of different methods. This makes the obtained regularities better substantiated. 

We also discuss the analysis of the accuracy of experimental data. In the case that we can directly measure some desired quantity, we need to estimate the accuracy of the measurement. If data reduction must be carried out, we must study the propagation of errors in measurements through the data reduction process. The two principal types of experimental errors, random errors and systematic errors, are discussed separately. Random errors are subject to statistical analysis, and we discuss this analysis. 

Henrion, A., Reduction of systematic errors in quantitative analysis by isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) an iterative method, Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem., 350, 657-658 (1994). 

The three different data sets produce extreme differences In the temperature factors (Table VIII). This difference Is not characteristic of just the SRRC program, as a similar range for cellulose Is In the literature. The temperature factor (B) Is Important because It Indicates systematic error In the Lp correction or other aspect of data gathering and reduction, for at least two of the data sets. Negative temperature factors, as found In the WS data, typically Indicate either that additional atoms, such as water molecules, are needed In the structure, or, when that Is known to be Incorrect, that there Is a flaw In some overall aspect of Intensity measurement, such as background correction. 

There is some uncertainty in all data, and model building must take this error into account. The first step in error management is error detection, error reduction, and error quantification. There are three types of error systematic error, random error, and blunders. Improved experimental protocol can reduce all these, but designing progressively better experiments eventually leads to diminishing returns so that at some point it is necessary to use some kind of error analysis to manage the uncertainty in the variable being quantified. 

The possibility of choosing a particular wavelength, rather than taking the output of one of the standard laboratory X-ray tubes, provides opportunities for special types of experiment beyond the scope of this discussion. Among the possible advantages are the avoidance or reduction of some systematic errors such as X-ray absorption or extinction, which may severely affect measured intensities and hence the precision and accuracy of crystal structures, and the exploitation of effects such as anomalous scattering for the determination of absolute configuration of chiral structures, as described in Section 2A.2.1. 

Sample Preparation Because large amounts of proteins are present in biological samples (except urine), conventional HPLC columns will not tolerate the direct introduction of these samples for quantitative analysis. Most bioanalytical assays have a sample preparation step to remove the bulk proteins from the samples [2], In addition, there are other important reasons for a sample preparation step when developing LC-MS/MS methods. These include the reduction of matrix components from the samples and minimization of ion suppression (also called matrix effects ) in the mass spectrometric detection [18]. Once a bioanalytical method has been developed, the method performance must remain consistent over the duration of the study. The results generated based on a validated method procedure should be free from systematic error and any other characterized errors and meet the predefined acceptance criteria. Sample preparation is used to... 

---