Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Systematic Botany

Spooner, D M., van den Berg, R.G., Rodriguez, A., Bamberg, J., Hijmans, R.J., Cabrera, S.I.L., (2004). Wild Potatoes (Solanum section Petota Solanaceae) of North and Central America. Systematic Botany Monographs Volume 68. [Pg.25]

Whitten, W. M., Williams, N. H., Armbruster, W. S., Battiste, M. A., Strekowski, L. and Lindquist, N. (1986). Carvone oxide an example of convergent evolution in euglossine pollinated plants. Systematic Botany 11 222-228. [Pg.177]

Verma, D.P.S. Stanley, J. (1989). The Legume-Rhizobium equation A co-evolution of two genomes. In Advances in Legume Biology, ed. C.H. Stirton J.L. Zarucchi. Monographs in Systematic Botany of the Missouri Botanical Garden 29, 545-57. [Pg.203]

Smith, J.E., An Introduction to Physiological and Systematic Botany, Longman, Hurst, Reese, Orme, Paternoster Row, White, London, 1807. [Pg.26]

Department of Systematic Botany Institute of Biological Sciences University of Aarhus Risskou, Denmark... [Pg.36]

Taxonomy or Systematic Botany considers the classification or arrangement of plants in groups or ranks in accordance with their relationships to one another. [Pg.1]

SYSTEMATIC BOTANY deals with the classification in units of different ranks and the relationship between these units. These units are called taxa (singular taxon), which has given the synonymous name taxonomic botany. [Pg.5]

The scientific name of the plants is dealt with in the part of systematic botany which is called botanical nomenclature. [Pg.5]

An important branch of systematic botany is chemotaxonomy, where the relationship... [Pg.5]

The species is the basic unit in systematic botany. Sometimes it is necessary to divide a species into subgroups to describe the variation within the species. The most usual... [Pg.6]

Muller, J. (2006). Systematics of Baccharis (Compositae, Astereae) in Bolioia, including an overview of the genus. (Systematics Botany Monographs v. 76). The American Society of Plant Taxonomists, ISBN 0912861762, Michigan. [Pg.419]

New Zealand, Vol. 1. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden. St Louis, MI Missouri Botanical Garden. [Pg.227]

Shaw, A.J., Holz, I., Cox, C.J., Goffinet, B. (2008). Phylogeny, character evolution, and biogeography of the Gondwanic moss family Hypopterygiaceae (Bryophyta). Systematic Botany 88, 21-30. [Pg.231]

C. pilifer and C. introflexus (Dicranaceae). Monographs in Systematic Botany 98,415-432. [Pg.232]

Frohlich, M. W. and Parker, D. S. (2000). The mostly male theory of flower evolutionary origins. Systematic Botany, 25,155-170. [Pg.39]

Rothwell, G. W. and Serbet, R. (1994). Lignophy te phylogeny and the evolution of spermatophytes a numerical cladistic analysis. Systematic Botany 19,443-482. [Pg.42]

Hyland, B. P. M. (1989). A revision of Lauraceae in Australia (excluding Cassytha). Australian Systematic Botany, 2,135-367. [Pg.85]

Endress, P. K. (2004). Structure and relationships of basal relictual angiosperms. Australian Systematic Botany, 17,343-366. [Pg.115]

RudaU, P. J. and Bateman, R. M. (2006). Morphological phylogenetic analysis of Pandanales testing contrasting hypotheses of floral evolution. Systematic Botany, 31,223-238. [Pg.117]

Cantino, P. (1985). Phylogenetic inference from nonuniversal derived character states. Systematic Botany, 10,119-122. [Pg.133]

Costello, A. and Modey, T. J. (2007). Phylogenetics of the Tetraplasandra group (Araliaceae) inf erred from ITS, 5S-NTS, and morphology. Systematic Botany, 32, 464-477. [Pg.134]

Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2008). Homology and evoludon of petals in the core eudicots. Systematic Botany, 33, 301-325. [Pg.139]

For SEM investigations, specimens were stained with 2% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in ethanol and acetone, critical-point dried and sputter-coated with gold, and studied at 20 kV with a Hitachi S-4000 scanning electron microscope. The liquid-fixed material and the permanent slides of serial microtome sections are deposited at the Institute of Systematic Botany of the University of Zurich (Z). [Pg.185]

Orlovich, D. A., Drinnan, A. N. andLadiges, P. Y. (1999). Floral development in Melaleuca and Callistemon (Myrtaceae). Australian Systematic Botany, 11,689-710. [Pg.235]

A cladistic analysis and systematic revision of Charianthus (Miconieae Melastomataceae) using morphological and molecular characters. Systematic Botany, 30,559-584. [Pg.235]

Ley, A. C. and Clafien-Bockhoff, R. (2011). Evolution in African Marantaceae -evidence from phylogenetic, ecological and morphological studies. Systematic Botany. In press. [Pg.254]

Stone, G. N., Raine, N. E., Prescott, M. and WUhner, P. G. (2003). Pollination ecologfy of acacias (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae). Australian Systematic Botany, 16,103-118. [Pg.277]

JULIEN B. Bachelier Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Switzerland... [Pg.326]

As is so often the case with cultivated plants, the systematic botany of citrus fruits is exceedingly confused, especially since the recognized species seem to be almost completely interfertile. Swingle, in Webber and Batchelor s The Citrus Industry (1938), recommends the terminology given in the second column of Table V. Since other authors, whose work will be quoted, have employed other names, synonyms are given in the third column. [Pg.290]


See other pages where Systematic Botany is mentioned: [Pg.503]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.673]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.109]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.219 , Pg.407 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.5 ]




SEARCH



Botany

© 2024 chempedia.info