System Variation Over Time

The run chart is simply a graphical record of a measure or characteristic plotted over time. Some type of run chart should always be a part of the study of variation in a process or system. The run chart focuses on dynamic complexity in a system (complexity over time) as well as the detail complexity of specific measures, file very simplicity of the chart is what makes it so powerful (Deming 1986). Everyone connected with the process can use and understand a run chart. Run charts are commonly used in business and economic documents. 

At the system level, look toward the task(s) of interest. Measure, estimate, or calculate demands on system performance resources (e.g., the speed, accuracy, etc. required), Rp,. q (f), where the notation here is analogous to that employed in step (5b). This represents the quantitative definition and communication of goals, or the set of values (Phlt) representing level of performance (P) desired in a specific high-level task (HIT). Use a worst-case or other less-conservative strategy (with due consideration of the impact of this choice) to summarize variations over time. This will result in a set of M points (Rd , for m = 1 to M) that lie in the multidimensional space defined by the set of I dimensions of performance. Typically, M > I. 

For the simple systems described here, the current variations over time enables one to calculate the diffusion coefficient of the species In question. This Is the Cottrell law I[t) = n 3[Pg.216]

The volume variation over time caused by addition of reagent A into reagent B (present in the tank) is calculated by means of an overall mass balance taking into account the average density p in the system without chemical reaction. Thus ... 

Fig. 1 shows the unavailability of the system function over time (saw-tooth curve) in comparison to the point estimate for the unavailabihty (dotted hne) derived from the mean unavailabilities of the system components. It can be seen that the point value commonly used for the unavailability of a system function (calculated from the mean and long-term unavailabilities of its components) is only a crude representation of the actually time-dependent unavailability. Obviously, it does not comply with the idea of conservativeness which is often claimed to justify the application of single values or simplified model assumptions in a PSA. In this context, it should be emphasized, that the variation considered for the unavailability of the system is only due to the stochastic behaviour of the system overtime. Epistemic uncertainties, forinstance, on the reliability parameters of system components were not considered. 

Thus, failure behaviors can be characterized by developing a model for the performance parameter and its variation over time, as shown in equation (1). In equation (1), x denotes a vector of failure inducing factors. By substituting p f into equation (1), TTF of the system (or component) can be determined, as shown in equation (2). 

The process displays serve as gateways to the databases and constantly poll the databases to retrieve process information for updates. A system may contain a function key to retrieve the active alarms log display directly, because fast response is especially critical under alarm conditions. Displays of how a process variable changes over a time horizon can be used to compare the magnitude of several data points dynamically and depict real-time trends to monitor process variations over time. The live trends show the values stored in the databases at the time the data are requested. 

The principal tool for performance-based quality assessment is the control chart. In a control chart the results from the analysis of quality assessment samples are plotted in the order in which they are collected, providing a continuous record of the statistical state of the analytical system. Quality assessment data collected over time can be summarized by a mean value and a standard deviation. The fundamental assumption behind the use of a control chart is that quality assessment data will show only random variations around the mean value when the analytical system is in statistical control. When an analytical system moves out of statistical control, the quality assessment data is influenced by additional sources of error, increasing the standard deviation or changing the mean value. 

A Shewhart chart is used to monitor the variation of individual results over time, compared to a target value. Shewhart charts are useful for identifying when bias has entered a measurement system. Non-random patterns in the data, such as drift or step-changes, indicate that bias is present. A range chart is used to monitor the precision of a measurement system, regardless of whether there is any bias present. The data on both types of chart are best evaluated by setting control limits. 

For these time periods, the ODEs and active algebraic constraints influence the state and control variables. For these active sets, we therefore need to be able to analyze and implicitly solve the DAE system. To represent the control profiles at the same level of approximation as for the state profiles, approximation and stability properties for DAE (rather than ODE) solvers must be considered. Moreover, the variational conditions for problem (16), with different active constraint sets over time, lead to a multizone set of DAE systems. Consequently, the analogous Kuhn-Tucker conditions from (27) must have stability and approximation properties capable of handling ail of these DAE systems. 

Without backpressure regulation for each channel, it is necessary to minimize the flow rate fluctuation over time. The relative standard deviation (RSD%) in retention time variation among the eight channels over 1 month for compounds A and B was less than 2% and for C and D it was less than 1%. The RSD% for all channels over a 1-month period for compounds A to D was 3.2, 2.4,1.6, and 1.5%, respectively. Therefore, this system is well suited for combinatorial library analysis. The UV chromatograms from channel 5 from different days are shown as an example in Fig. 2A. The retention times of the four compounds (compounds A to D) from all eight channels during a 1-month period are shown in Fig. 2B. 

---