Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surprisal from consistency conditions

The NO vibrational distribution has been measured by infrared chemiluminescence under arrested relaxation conditions. The distribution is relatively flat from v = 1-7 and then decreases monotonically from 8 to 12 the value, assuming only 0( P) formation is 0.27. The break in the distribution occurs very close to the energy expected if the 0( D) channel is important. The vibrational surprisal also consists of two approximately linear regimes. The possibility of some contribution from N( P) reactions cannot be excluded and further work will be necessary to decide about the... [Pg.146]

We found that results from one spectrum to another were within an order of one to two branches per thousand carbons as far as consistency was concerned. Spectra, which were obtained on other systems under less than equilibrium conditions, show that the total methyl content, surprisingly, stays very constant. You find that the low end is enhanced and the long branches are saturated slightly however, the total remains the same. [Pg.317]

These A -representabUity constraints are called the Tl (Eq. (70)) and T2 (Eq. (71)) conditions [52]. Calculations with these constraints give dramatically better results than calculations using only the P, Q, and G conditions [35, 53]. From the standpoint of conventional quantum chemistry, this is not that surprising one would expect good results from constraints that include three-electron operators, since these constraints help ensure that the form of the 2-matiix is consistent with a proper representation of three-electron correlations. [Pg.468]

Essentially the same route is followed for the synthesis of the triphenylethylene nitromifene (8-5). The sequence starts with Friedel-Crafts acylation of the alkylation product (8-1) from phenol and 1,2-dibromoethane with the acid chloride from anisic acid (8-2). The displacement of bromine in the product (8-3) with pyrrolidine leads to the formation of the basic ether and thus (8-4). Condensation of that product with benzylmagnesium bromide gives the tertiary alcohol (8-5). This product is then treated with a mixture of nitric and acetic acids. The dehydration products from the first step almost certainly consist of a mixture of the E and Z isomers for the same reasons advanced above. The olefin undergoes nitration under reaction conditions to lead to nitromifene (8-6) as a mixture of isomers [8] the separated compounds are reported to show surprisingly equivalent agonist/antagonist activities. [Pg.196]

At this point we should note that it is not a trivial task to measure accurately A aw//, values. This is particularly true for very hydrophobic compounds. Therefore, it is also not too surprising that experimentally determined Aawtf, values reported by different authors may differ substantially (see examples given in Table 6.3). Furthermore, particularly for many very hydrophobic compounds, there seems to be a discrepancy between Aaw//, values derived from measurements of Kixw at different temperatures (Eq. 6-10) under dilute conditions, and Aawf/, values calculated from the enthalpy of vaporization and the enthalpy of solution (AwL//, = H, see Fig. 5.1 note that Awa/7, = -Aaw//(). Note that this latter approach reflects saturated conditions. Nevertheless, before using an experimentally determined Aaw//, value, it is advisable to check this value for consistency with that calculated from Aaw//i and HI. [Pg.199]

Figure 19.10 shows the CO yields from the PA6-based materials under different fire conditions. This shows consistently lower CO yields for well-ventilated burning compared with small or large under-ventilated conditions [13]. Under well-ventilated conditions it shows increased CO yields for materials including NC or a fire retardant, but surprisingly the combined effect of both FR and NC result in lower CO yield. Under the more toxic under-ventilated conditions, overall the yields of CO are much higher, but there is little difference between small and large under-ventilated conditions, or on incorporation of either fire retardant or NC [13]. [Pg.524]


See other pages where Surprisal from consistency conditions is mentioned: [Pg.83]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.900]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.867]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.582]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.284]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.244 ]




SEARCH



Surprisal

Surprises

© 2024 chempedia.info