Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface iron oxidation

Hydrophilic surfaces include those permanent>chaige clays and other minerals that are hydroxylated at their surfaces (iron oxides, kaolinite, etc.). Hydrophobic (organophilic) surfaces include 2 1 silicates with little or no permanent charge (e.g., talc), and components of humus. [Pg.379]

Frankenburg (40) has pointed out that the same type of calculations can be extended to the iron-iron nitride system. Thus the same iron atoms capable of picking up oxygen to form surface iron oxide with 0.04% water vapor would be capable of picking up nitrogen at a few atmospheres pressure to form surface iron nitride even though the dissociation pressure of the bulk Fe N is about 4500 atmospheres. [Pg.214]

The catalytic data also indicated a strong dependence of the low hydrocarbons conversion on the catalyst elemental composition. For the Lai, s Fe03 g perovskites, a progressive Fe20s enrichment of the surface was evidenced by XPS characterization when decreasing the lanthanum content of the solid. Such additional undesirable surface iron oxide enrichment induced an inhibiting effect on the catalytic activity. As a result, the most efficient lanthanum iron-based perov-sldte was the stoichiometric LaFe03 mixed oxide [40]. [Pg.399]

The oxide-layer network is present essentially in the bulk of the catalyst. The significant amount of surface iron oxides found in some samples of the present study can be attributed in part to a thick layer (=incomplete reduction) of network oxides and must be ascribed in part to individual segregated oxide crystals. These segregates, which have been identified by electron microscopy as well as by differential charging in the XPS (see, e.g.. Fig. 2.42), may be binary or ternary oxides. Whatever their structure, they play the role of spectator species, which have been formed as an undesirable consequence of an inappropriate choice of reduction conditions. [Pg.98]

DRI can be produced in pellet, lump, or briquette form. When produced in pellets or lumps, DRI retains the shape and form of the iron oxide material fed to the DR process. The removal of oxygen from the iron oxide during direct reduction leaves voids, giving the DRI a spongy appearance when viewed through a microscope. Thus, DRI in these forms tends to have lower apparent density, greater porosity, and more specific surface area than iron ore. In the hot briquetted form it is known as hot briquetted iron (HBI). Typical physical properties of DRI forms are shown in Table 1. [Pg.424]

In the EASTMET process iron oxide fines (minus 0.1 mm), pulverized coal, and binder are mixed together and pehetized. The green pehets are heated in a dryer to remove moisture and fed to a rotary hearth furnace, where the pehets are placed on a flat rotating surface (hearth) in an even layer one to two pehets deep. As the hearth rotates the pehets are heated to 1250—1350°C, and the iron oxide is reduced to metallic iron in 6 to 10 minutes. [Pg.431]

Sulfide collectors ia geaeral show Htfle affinity for nonsulfide minerals, thus separation of one sulfide from another becomes the main issue. The nonsulfide collectors are in general less selective and this is accentuated by the large similarities in surface properties between the various nonsulfide minerals (42). Some examples of sulfide flotation are copper sulfides flotation from siUceous gangue sequential flotation of sulfides of copper, lead, and zinc from complex and massive sulfide ores and flotation recovery of extremely small (a few ppm) amounts of precious metals. Examples of nonsulfide flotation include separation of sylvite, KCl, from haUte, NaCl, which are two soluble minerals having similar properties selective flocculation—flotation separation of iron oxides from siUca separation of feldspar from siUca, siUcates, and oxides phosphate rock separation from siUca and carbonates and coal flotation. [Pg.412]

Iron Oxide Reds. From a chemical point of view, red iron oxides are based on the stmcture of hematite, a-Fe202, and can be prepared in various shades, from orange through pure red to violet. Different shades are controlled primarily by the oxide s particle si2e, shape, and surface properties. Production. Four methods are commercially used in the preparation of iron oxide reds two-stage calcination of FeS047H2 O precipitation from an aqueous solution thermal dehydration of yellow goethite, a-FeO(OH) and oxidation of synthetic black oxide, Fe O. ... [Pg.11]

Iron oxide yellows can also be produced by the direct hydrolysis of various ferric solutions with alkahes such as NaOH, Ca(OH)2, and NH. To make this process economical, ferric solutions are prepared by the oxidation of ferrous salts, eg, ferrous chloride and sulfate, that are available as waste from metallurgical operations. The produced precipitate is washed, separated by sedimentation, and dried at about 120°C. Pigments prepared by this method have lower coverage, and because of their high surface area have a high oil absorption. [Pg.12]

The exceUent adhesion to primed films of polyester combined with good dielectric properties and good surface properties makes the vinyhdene chloride copolymers very suitable as binders for iron oxide pigmented coatings for magnetic tapes (168—170). They perform very weU in audio, video, and computer tapes. [Pg.442]

As shown in Figure 2, adsorption of dispersants on particle surfaces can increase 2eta potential further, enhancing electrostatic repulsion. Increased repulsion between particles is evidenced by lower viscosity in concentrated slurries, or decreased settling rates in dilute suspensions. The effect of added dispersants on settling of (anhydrous) iron oxide particles is shown in Figure 3. [Pg.147]

Disproportionation of ethylene oxide to ethylene and carbon dioxide also occurs at temperatures higher than about 150°C ia the presence of high surface area iron oxides (87). [Pg.454]

Pretreatment For most membrane applications, particularly for RO and NF, pretreatment of the feed is essential. If pretreatment is inadequate, success will be transient. For most applications, pretreatment is location specific. Well water is easier to treat than surface water and that is particularly true for sea wells. A reducing (anaerobic) environment is preferred. If heavy metals are present in the feed even in small amounts, they may catalyze membrane degradation. If surface sources are treated, chlorination followed by thorough dechlorination is required for high-performance membranes [Riley in Baker et al., op. cit., p. 5-29]. It is normal to adjust pH and add antisealants to prevent deposition of carbonates and siillates on the membrane. Iron can be a major problem, and equipment selection to avoid iron contamination is required. Freshly precipitated iron oxide fouls membranes and reqiiires an expensive cleaning procedure to remove. Humic acid is another foulant, and if it is present, conventional flocculation and filtration are normally used to remove it. The same treatment is appropriate for other colloidal materials. Ultrafiltration or microfiltration are excellent pretreatments, but in general they are... [Pg.2037]

As a result of the larger flues and the restric ted surface area per unit of gas passed, regenerators employed with this type of furnace exhibit much lower efficiency than would be reahzed with smaller flues. In view of the large amount of iron oxide contained in open-hearth exhaust gas and the alkah fume present in glass-tank stack gases, however, smaller checkerbrick dimensions are considered imprac tical. [Pg.2406]

Acid-soluble metals such as iron have a relationship as shown in Fig. 28-2 7, In the middle pH range ( 4 to 10), the corrosion rate is controlled by the rate of transport of oxidizer (usually dissolved O9) to the metal surface. Iron is weakly amphoteric. At very high temperatures such as those encountered in boilers, the corrosion rate increases with increasing basicity, as shown by the dashed line. [Pg.2421]

Internal surfaces exhibited many rounded, mutually intersecting pits partially buried beneath silt, iron oxide, and sand deposits. Orange and brown corrosion products and deposits overlaid all. Sulfides were present in the deposits and corrosion products. The material was easily removed when acid was applied (Figs. 4.21 and 4.22). [Pg.86]


See other pages where Surface iron oxidation is mentioned: [Pg.406]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.753]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.753]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.729]    [Pg.1775]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.2173]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.95 ]




SEARCH



Iron -containing oxide surfaces

Iron oxides and the surface textures of catalysts

Iron oxides specific surface area

Iron oxides surfaces

Iron oxides surfaces

Iron oxides, surface structures

Iron surface

Reaction between Nitric Oxide and the Surface of Iron

Surface iron oxide nanopartides

Surfaces ferrous iron oxidation

© 2024 chempedia.info