Surface Integral Equation Method

The null-field method leads to a nonsingular integral equation of the first kind. However, in the framework of the surface integral equation method, the transmission boundary-value problem can be reduced to a pair of singular integral equations of the second kind [97]. These equations are formulated in terms of two surface fields which are treated as independent unknowns. In order to elucidate the difference between the null-field method and the surface integral equation method we follow the analysis of Martin and Ola [155] and review the basic boundary integral equations for the transmission boundary-value problem. We consider the vector potential Aa with density a 

For a sufficiently smooth tangential density, we also have 

Considering the null-field equations for the electric and magnetic fields in Di and Dg, and passing to the boundary along a normal direction we obtain 

---

The range of application of the integral equation method is not limited to the standard dielectric model. It encompasses the cases of anisotropic dielectrics [8] (liquid crystals), weak ionic solutions [8], metallic surfaces (see ref. [28] and references cited therein),. .. However, it is required that the electrostatic equation outside the cavity is linear, with constant coefficients. For instance, liquid crystals and weak ionic solutions can be modelled by the electrostatic equations... 

Consider laminar forced convective flow over a flat plate at whose surface the heat transfer rate per unit area, qw is constant. Assuming a Prandtl number of 1, use the integral equation method to derive an expression for the variation of surface temperature. Assume two-dimensional flow. 

The approximate integral equation method that was discussed in Chapters 2 and 3 can also be applied to the boundary layer flows on surfaces in a porous medium. As discussed in Chapters 2 and 3, this integral equation method has largely been superceded by purely numerical methods of the type discussed above. However, integral equation methods are still sometimes used and it therefore appears to be appropriate to briefly discuss the use of the method here. Attention will continue to be restricted to two-dimensional constant fluid property forced flow. 

The synthetic MT data set is generated by the IE modeling code SYSEM (Xiong, 1992), based on the integral equation method, for a model of a dipping dike (Figure 10-5, left panel) of resistivity 10 ohm-m, submerged in a half-space of 100 ohm-m. The top of the dike is at depth 200 m, and its bottom is at depth 700 m beneath the surface. The dike consists of two separated parts. 

The study of liquids near solid surfaces using microscopic (atomistic-based) descriptions of liquid molecules is relatively new. Given a potential energy function for the interaction between liquid molecules and between the liquid molecules and the solid surface, the integral equation for the liquid density profile and the liquid molecules orientation can be solved approximately, or the molecular dynamics method can be used to calculate these and many other structural and dynamic properties. In applying these methods to water near a metal surface, care must be taken to include additional features that are unique to this system (see later discussion). 

In the foregoing, the expressions needed to account for mass transport of O and R, e.g. eqns. (23), (27), (46), and (61c), were introduced as special solutions of the integral equations (22), giving the general relationship between the surface concentrations cG (0, t), cR (0, t) and the faradaic current in the case where mass transport occurs via semi-infinite linear diffusion. It is worth emphasizing that eqns. (22) hold irrespective of the relaxation method applied. Of course, other types of mass transport (e.g. bounded diffusion, semi-infinite spherical diffusion, and convection) may be involved, leading to expressions different from eqns. (22). 

An integral equation for adsorpt ion on non-uniform surfaces is derived and an approximate method for its solution T is given. 

For electron transfer processes with finite kinetics, the time dependence of the surface concentrations does not allow the application of the superposition principle, so it has not been possible to deduce explicit analytical solutions for multipulse techniques. In this case, numerical methods for the simulation of the response need to be used. In the case of SWV, a semi-analytical method based on the use of recursive formulae derived with the aid of the step-function method [26] for solving integral equations has been extensively used [6, 17, 27]. 

The most sophisticated methods developed to date to treat solvent effects in electronic interactions and EET are those reported by Mennucci and co-workers [47,66,67], Their procedure is based on the integral equation formalism version of the polarizable continuum model (IEFPCM) [48,68,69], The solvent is described as a polarizable continuum influenced by the reaction field exerted by the charge distribution of the donor and acceptor molecules. In the case of EET, it is the particular transitions densities that are important. The molecules are enclosed in a boundary surface that takes a realistic shape as determined by the molecular structure. 

In the computational practice, the ASC density is discretized into a collection of point charges qk, spread on the cavity surface. The apparent charges are then determined by solving the electrostatic Poisson equation using a Boundary Element Method scheme (BEM) [1], Many BEM schemes have been proposed, being the most general one known as integral equation formalism (IEFPCM) [10]. 

As discussed in Chapters 2 and 3, in the integral method it is assumed that the boundary layer has a definite thickness and the overall or integrated momentum and thermal energy balances across the boundary layer are considered. In the case of flow over a body in a porous medium, if the Darcy assumptions are used, there is, as discussed before, no velocity boundary layer, the velocity parallel to the surface near the surface being essentially equal to the surface velocity given by the potential flow solution. For flow over a body in a porous medium, therefore, only the energy integral equation need be considered. This equation was shown in Chapter 2 to be ... 

---