Support covalent bonding

The reaction between a trinuclear metal carbonyl cluster and trimetbyl amine borane has been investigated (41) and here the cluster anion functions as a Lewis base toward the boron atom, forming a B—O covalent bond (see Carbonyls). Molecular orbital calculations, supported by stmctural characterization, show that coordination of the amine borane causes small changes in the trinuclear framework. 

DNA synthesizers operate on a principle similar to that of the Merrifield solid-phase peptide synthesizer (Section 26.8). In essence, a protected nucleotide is covalently bonded to a solid support, and one nucleotide at a time is added to the growing chain by the use of a coupling reagent. After the final nucleotide has been added, all the protecting groups are removed and the synthetic DNA is cleaved from the solid support. Five steps are needed ... 

Macromolecules bearing reactive groups in the repeat units along their chains are capable of multiple interaction with the matrix. As early as 1973, Wilchek prepared Sepharose-based supports chemically modified by chemisorbed polylysine and polyvinylamine [41]. The leakage of dyes covalently bonded to these supports was reduced remarkably as compared to non-modified Sepharose activated by cyanogen bromide. Thus, stable and high capacity affinity adsorbents could be prepared by the introduction of macromolecular spacers between a matrix and a biospecific ligand. 

T1O2 and Ce02 based supports. The surface of metal crystallites deposited on such supports is decorated with O2 even during catalytic reactions. And this O2 species is A (102 to 105) times less reactive than covalently bonded O. (Chapter 11). 

The Additivity of the Energies of Normal Covalent Bonds. The Hydrogen Halides and the Halogen Halides.—It is found that there exists a convincing body of empirical evidence in support of the postulate6 that the energies of normal covalent bonds are additive that is... 

Immobilization by chemical bonding gives strong, irreversible attachments to a solid support. The bonds are normally covalent but they can be electrostatic. Typical supports are functionalized glass and ceramic beads and fibers. Enzymes are sometimes cross-linked to form a gel. Occasionally, enz5anes can be flocculated while retaining catalytic activity. 

Abstract The immobilization of chiral catalysts through non-covalent methods, as opposed to covalent immobilization, allows an easier preparation of chiral heterogeneous catalysts with, in principle, less influence of the support on the conformational preferences of the catalytic complex. In this review the different possibilities for immobilization without forming a covalent bond between the chiral diazahgand and the support, which can be either solid or liquid, are presented. 

In the last 20 years a great deal of effort has been focused towards the immobilization of chiral catalysts [2] and disparate results have been obtained. In order to ensure the retention of the valuable chiral hgand, the most commonly used immobihzation method has been the creation of a covalent bond between the ligand and the support, which is usually a solid, hi many cases this strategy requires additional functionalization of the chiral hgand, and this change - together with the presence of the very bulky support - may produce unpredictable effects on the conformational preferences of the catalytic complex. This in turn affects the transition-state structures and thus the enantioselectivity of the process. 

In principle this is the method that gives rise to the strongest support-complex interaction. We have considered in this category all the methods in which the support compensates for at least one of the charges of the complex, usually due to the metal, although without considering the exact nature of the metal-support bond, i.e., purely ionic or polarized covalent. In any case, the only possible covalent bond between support and complex would be estabhshed with the metal center, not with the chiral hgand. 

Enzymes are immobilized by a variety of methods. Two general types of immobilization procedures are used. The first-type procedures are based on weak interactions between the support and the enzyme and are classified as physical methods. The second-type procedures rest upon the formation of covalent bonds between the enzyme and the support and are classified as chemical methods. 

The most frequently used organic supports are polystyrene and styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer beads with functional groups such as diphenylpho.sphine covalently bonded. The polymer-anchored catalyst complex can then be obtained, for example, by displacement of a ligand already co-ordinated to a soluble metal complex (Cornils and Herrmann, 1996) ... 

---