Wavefunction superposition

Convolution Integral of the Response Function and Laser Pulse Creation and Evolution of Electronic and Nuclear Superposition Wavefunctions... 

The D-ND for R 00 can be recognized from theoretical considerations. However, because of the strong dependence of the Cl mixing on R, it is not possible to predict quantitatively its importance at equilibrium or further in, where, normally, the united atom limit also plays an important role. For the sake of completeness, it is useful to quantify the above. I write the two-term superposition wavefunction as (I omit the dependence of the orbitals on the parameter). 

Given the normal formulation of QM in ferms of sfationary states, including the case of resonances in fhe confinuous specfrum (see the superposition wavefunction of Eq. (2)), and fhe corresponding expressions which are measured on the energy axis, the question arises as to how easy it is to prepare unstable states in polyelectronic atoms and molecules and to observe their time-dependence. The answer involves more than one components. The most frequently mentioned is to consider the magnitude of fhe lifefime (provided, of course, fhaf if is known) relative to the duration of fhe excitation process. Obviously, if fhe former is much longer than the latter, the concept of a decaying sfafe is valid. 

From a theoretical perspective, the object that is initially created in the excited state is a coherent superposition of all the wavefunctions encompassed by the broad frequency spread of the laser. Because the laser pulse is so short in comparison with the characteristic nuclear dynamical time scales of the motion, each excited wavefunction is prepared with a definite phase relation with respect to all the others in the superposition. It is this initial coherence and its rate of dissipation which determine all spectroscopic and collisional properties of the molecule as it evolves over a femtosecond time scale. For IBr, the nascent superposition state, or wavepacket, spreads and executes either periodic vibrational motion as it oscillates between the inner and outer turning points of the bound potential, or dissociates to form separated atoms, as indicated by the trajectories shown in Figure 1.3. 

Strictly speaking, a chiral species cannot correspond to a true stationary state of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation H

time scale for such spontaneous racemization is extremely long. The wavefunction of practical interest to the (finite-lived) laboratory chemist is the non-stationary Born-Oppenheimer model Eq. (1.2), rather than the true T of Eq. (1.1). 

The concept of scarred quantum wavefunctions was introduced by Eric Heller (E.J. Heller, 1984) a little over 20 years ago in work that contradicted what appeared at the time to be a reasonable expectation. It had been conjectured (M.V. Berry, 1981) that a semiclassical eigenstate (when appropriately transformed) is concentrated on the region explored by a generic classical orbit over infinite times. Applied to classically chaotic systems, where a typical orbit was expected to uniformly cover the energetically allowed region, the corresponding typical eigenfunction was anticipated to be a superposition of plane... 

A fruitful approach to the problem of intermolecular interaction is perturbation theory. The wavefunctions of the two separate interacting molecules are perturbed when the overlap is nonzero, and standard treatment [49] yields separate contributions to the interaction energy, namely the Coulombic, polarization, dispersion, and repulsion terms. Basis-set superposition is no longer a problem because these energies are calculated directly from the perturbed wavefunction and not by difference between dimers and monomers. The separation into intuitive contributions is a special bonus, because these terms can be correlated with intuitive molecular... 

This spatial distribution is not stationary but evolves in time. So in this case, one has a wavefunction that is not a pure eigenstate of the Hamiltonian (one says that E is a superposition state or a non-stationary state) whose average energy remains constant (E=E2j lap + Ei,2 IbP) but whose spatial distribution changes with time. 

Recent work improved earlier results and considered the effects of electron correlation and vibrational averaging [278], Especially the effects of intra-atomic correlation, which were seen to be significant for rare-gas pairs, have been studied for H2-He pairs and compared with interatomic electron correlation the contributions due to intra- and interatomic correlation are of opposite sign. Localized SCF orbitals were used again to reduce the basis set superposition error. Special care was taken to assure that the supermolecular wavefunctions separate correctly for R —> oo into a product of correlated H2 wavefunctions, and a correlated as well as polarized He wavefunction. At the Cl level, all atomic and molecular properties (polarizability, quadrupole moment) were found to be in agreement with the accurate values to within 1%. Various extensions of the basis set have resulted in variations of the induced dipole moment of less than 1% [279], Table 4.5 shows the computed dipole components, px, pz, as functions of separation, R, orientation (0°, 90°, 45° relative to the internuclear axis), and three vibrational spacings r, in 10-6 a.u. of dipole strength [279]. 

The formulation of the extended Wigner-Weisskopf scheme proceeds along lines similar to those employed in the derivation of the decay law for a single level8 in Section III. The time-dependent wavefunction is displayed as a superposition of the eigenstates of HR + (see eq. (10-8)) ... 

When the fine structure frequencies fall below 100 MHz they can also be measured by quantum beat spectroscopy. The basic principle of quantum beat spectroscopy is straightforward. Using a polarized pulsed laser, a coherent superposition of the two fine structure states is excited in a time short compared to the inverse of the fine structure interval. After excitation, the wavefunctions of the two fine structure levels evolve at different rates due to their different energies. For example if the nd3/2 and nd5/2 mf = 3/2 states are coherently excited from the 3p3/2 state at time t = 0, the nd wavefunction at a later time t can be written as40... 

The above discussion of the correspondence principle was not entirely satisfactory. It may be true that for very high quantum numbers, the wavefunction represents a probability distribution indistinguishable from that predicted in classical mechanics. However, classical mechanics does not need probability distributions, as it deals with precisely known trajectories. How can the wave picture be compatible with these To answer this question, we must look at a wavefunction constructed by the superposition of sinusoidal waves with different lengths. We use the earlier equations in this chapter to write... 

Fig. 2.9 The wavefunction given by eqns 2.37 and 2.38, representing the superposition of two waves of different length. Note the heats , periodic variations in amplitude arising from the Interference of the two sinusoidal waves.

Taking the nuclear coordinates Q to be classical-like, the eikonal representation gives the wavefunction k(g, Q, t) for an initial electronic state / as a superposition of functions, of the form... 

Here k0 is the wave vector of the incident particle, x(K) is its spin wave function, and k is its spin coordinate. The second term in (4.3) is a superposition of products of scattered waves and the wavefunctions of all the possible molecular states that obey the energy conservation law ... 

In principle, with the scattering wavefunctions at one s disposal, it is possible to segment a complex superposition of single-ionization states in to portions belonging to different symmetries, channels, and spectral domains. Indeed,... 

Snider is best known for his paper reporting what is now referred to as the Waldmann-Snider equation.34 (L. Waldmann independently derived the same result via an alternative method.) The novelty of this equation is that it takes into account the consequences of the superposition of quantum wavefunctions. For example, while the usual Boltzmann equation describes the collisionally induced decay of the rotational state probability distribution of a spin system to equilibrium, the modifications allow the effects of magnetic field precession to be simultaneously taken into account. Snider has used this equation to explain a variety of effects including the Senftleben-Beenakker effect (i.e., is, the magnetic and electric field dependence of gas transport coefficients), gas phase NMR relaxation, and gas phase muon spin relaxation.35... 

The other approach most frequently used to describe a correlated wavefunction beyond the independent-particle model is based on configuration interaction (Cl). (If the expansion is made on grounds of other basis sets, the approach is often called superposition of configurations, SOC, in order to distinguish it from the Cl method.) According to the general principles of quantum mechanics, the exact wavefunction which is a solution of the full Hamiltonian H can be obtained as an expansion in any complete set of basis functions which have the same symmetry properties ... 

The next step concerns the evaluation of the involved matrix elements. Within the lowest approximation, final-state channel interactions are neglected, and the many-electron wavefunctions are expressed as superpositions of Slater determin-antal wavefunctions with the correct symmetry and parity. In the present case of... 

The calculation of cross sections, which are defined in the limit of an infinitely long laser pulse, by means of a wavepacket, which is created by an infinitely short pulse, seems contradictory on the first glance. On the other hand, note that the wavepacket created by the infinitely short light pulse is merely a coherent superposition of all stationary wavefunctions with expansion coefficients proportional to the amplitudes t(Ef,n). 

Fig. 7.2. Cartoon of the evolution of a one-dimensional wavepacket, (t), in a potential with barrier. Remember that the horizontal line does not represent a particular energy The wavepacket is a superposition of stationary wavefunctions for a whole range of energies.

According to Section 4.1.1 the wavepacket is a superposition of stationary wavefunctions corresponding to a relatively wide range of energies. This and the superposition of three apparently different types of internal vibrations additionally obscures details of the underlying molecular motion that causes the recurrences. A particularly clear picture emerges, however, if we analyze the fragmentation dynamics in terms of classical trajectories. 

The excited complex breaks apart very rapidly and only a minor fraction performs, on the average, one single internal vibration. Therefore, the total stationary wavefunction does not exhibit a clear change of its nodal structure when the energy is tuned from one peak to another (Weide and Schinke 1989). In the light of Section 7.4.1 we can argue that the direct part of the total wavefunction, S dir-, dominates and therefore obscures the more interesting indirect part, Sind- The superposition of the direct and the indirect parts makes it difficult to analyze diffuse structures in the time-independent approach. In contrast, the time-dependent theory allows, by means of the autocorrelation function, the separation of the direct and resonant contributions and it is therefore much better suited to examine diffuse structures. 

Equation 6.8 does not always have to be satisfied f(x) does not have to be a stationary state. However, if f(x) does not satisfy Equation 6.8, the probability distribution P(x) and the expectation values of observables will change with time. The stationary states of a system constitute a complete basis set—which just means that any wavefunction f can be written as a superposition of the stationary states ... 

Since the wavefunction is not a stationary state, it evolves according to Equation 6.11. If there are only two stationary states in the superposition state, as in Figure 6.3, the probability distribution and all of the observables oscillate at a frequency a> = (If — E )/Ti (see Problem 6-10). If we have the left side wavefunction in Figure 6.3 at time / = 0, at later times we will have a right side wavefunction. At... 

---