Scattering wavefunction

The former phase, external control tool that can be tuned to vary the interference term and hence the reaction outcome. The latter phase, 5(E), serves as an analytical tool that provides a route to the phases of the scattering wavefunctions. 

In Section IV we quantify the relation of the information-rich phase of the scattering wavefunction to the observable 8(E) of Eq. (5). Here we proceed by connecting the two-pathway method with several other phase-sensitive experiments. Consider first excitation from g) into an electronically excited bound state with a sufficiently broad pulse to span two levels, Ea and ),... 

In both the diatom-diatom and atom-triatom reactions, the energy-dependent scattering wavefunction is obtained by a Fourier transform of the propagated wavepacket ... 

The asymptotic form of the body-fixed radial scattering wavefunction,... 

The form of the scattering wavefunction has been represented in a very general manner, specifically, as a product of a function in body-fixed coordinates the parity-adapted total angular momenrnm... 

The first part of the review deals with aspects of photodissociation theory and the second, with reactive scattering theory. Three appendix sections are devoted to important technical details of photodissociation theory, namely, the detailed form of the parity-adapted body-fixed scattering wavefunction needed to analyze the asymptotic wavefunction in photodissociation theory, the definition of the initial wavepacket in photodissociation theory and its relationship to the initial bound-state wavepacket, and finally the theory of differential state-specific photo-fragmentation cross sections. Many of the details developed in these appendix sections are also relevant to the theory of reactive scattering. 

Comparing this with the form of the scattering wavefunction given in Eq. (4.3), we can write the scattering wavefunction in the following form ... 

Takatsuka and Gordon (21a) have developed a "full collision" formulation of photodissociation which describes a multichannel process on the repulsive surface for both direct and indirect events. The scattering wavefunctions that are used to generate the T-matrix and the FC overlaps are not zeroth-order uncoupled functions, but solutions of the coupled-channel problem. 

In principle, with the scattering wavefunctions at one s disposal, it is possible to segment a complex superposition of single-ionization states in to portions belonging to different symmetries, channels, and spectral domains. Indeed,... 

The nuclear wavefunctions are continuum, i.e., scattering, wavefunctions which asymptotically behave like free waves rather than decaying to zero like the bound-state wavefunctions, scattering wavefunctions fulfil distinct boundary conditions in the limit R — oo. 

In passing we note that the scattering wavefunctions appropriate for full collisions, A + BC(n ) —> A + BC(n), are defined such that the incoming and outgoing probability currents are... 

Scattering wavefunctions represent states with unit incoming flux in one particular channel, n, and outgoing flux in all vibrational states n. The probability for a transition from initial channel n to final channel n is given by Sn n 2, which explains the name scattering matrix. 

Continuum wavefunctions can also be generated by solving the partial differential equation (3.3) directly without first transforming it into a set of ordinary differential equations. One possible scheme is the finite elements method (Askar and Rabitz 1984 Jaquet 1987). Another method, which has been applied for the calculation of multi-dimensional scattering wavefunctions, is the 5-matrix version of the Kohn variational principle (Zhang and Miller 1990). 

Case, D. A., and M. Karplus (1976). The calculation of one-electron properties from Xa multiple scattering wavefunctions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 39, 33-38. 

It was Fermi who realized that it was possible to invoke an equivalent potential, which can be used to calculate the changes in the wavefunction outside the interaction by perturbation theory [13]. The unknown form of the strong nuclear interaction can be replaced by a new potential, which gives the same scattered wavefunction as the square well potential. In the derivation of Fermi s equivalent or pseudo potential [14] it is seen that the magnitude of the scattering potential depends on the scattering length of the nucleus and the mass of the neutron, m ... 

Still, as discussed in Section 2,8.1, normalization is in some sense still a useful concept even for such processes. As we saw in Section 2.8.1, we may think of an infinite system as a Q oo limit of a finite system of volume Q. Intuition suggests that a scattering process characterized by a short range potential should not depend on system size. On the other hand the normalization condition dx fl/(x)p = 1 implies that scattering wavefunctions will vanish everywhere like as Q CX3. We have noted (Section 2.8) that physically meaningful results are associated either with products such as A V<(x) 2 or yo V (x)p, where jV, the total number of particles, and p, the density of states, are both proportional to Q. Thus, for physical observables the volume factor cancels. 

We would like to complete this section by briefly describing some of the recent developments on electronically non-adiabatic reactions. From the standpoint of the coupled-channels method, there is in principle no added difficulty in treating more than one electronic state of the reactive system. This may be done, for example, by keeping electronic degrees of freedom in the Hamiltonian and expanding the total scattering wavefunction in the electronic states of reactants and products. In practice, however, some new difficulties may arise, such as non-orthogonality of vibrational states on different electronic potential surfaces. There is at present a lack of quantum mechanical results on this problem. 

As discussed above, for each value of the hyperradius r, we expand the total scattering wavefunction in a set of previously determined orthogonal surface functions. A log-derivative method [47] is used to propagate the solution numerically, from small r to large r. The parameters which control the accuracy of the integration are (a) the number of sectors, (b) the number of vibration-rotation states included for each electronic state in each arrangement, and (c) the maximum value of the total projection quantum number K. These are increased until the desired quantities (integral and/or... 

Here the transformation angle depends on R, 6 and y. Since there is no coupling between the H state, of A reflection symmetry, with the H c> and E> states, of A reflection symmetry, the adiabatic and diabatic states of A" reflection symmetry are identical. Alternatively, we can define the diabatic states in terms of signed-1, rather than Cartesian, projectiorts, namely Ili>, H i>, and E>. These signed-1 states are those which we nsed above in the expansion of the scattering wavefunction. Note that the state we desigrrate as E corresponds to A = 0. 

Clary, D.C. (1994) Four-atom reaction dynamics,. 7. Phys. Chem. 98, 10678-10688. Pack, R.T. and Parker, G.A. (1987) Qtianttim reactive scattering in three dimensions tising hypersidierical (APH) coordinates. Theory, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 3888-3921. Truhlar, D.G., Mead, C.A. and Brandt, M.A. (1975) Time-Reversal Invariance, Representations for Scattering Wavefunctions, Symmetry of the Scattering Matrix, and Differential Cross-Sections, Adv. Che.m. Phys. 33, 295-344. 

The fundamentals of the QM time-independent methodology employed here can be found in Section 2. AAA just briefly give the relevant details for the studied reaction. QM calculations were performed for the 0( D) + H2(t = 0, j = 0,1,2) reaction at Eeoi=25, 56, 84, 100 and 137 meA collision energy on the ground l A DK PES. For the. 7 = 0 partial wave, the scattering wavefunction was expanded on a basis... 

---