Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sulfur groups, detection

Scheme 60). Griesbeck et al. assume that in a non-polar solvent such as benzene the intramolecular electron transfer from the methionic sulfur group is much faster than the abstraction of hydrogen from the hydroxyl group of the unprotected amino acid. C-Hydrogen abstraction leads to 313, whereas previous lactonization of the zwitterionic biradical 311 yields 314. Since the cis-hydroxy acid is not detected it is conceivable that it cyclizes immediately to the lactone 314. Photolysis of the corresponding methyl ester under the same conditions attains improved yields (84% combined) of two diastereomeric tricyclic products in a ratio of 48 52. [Pg.119]

The majority of the sulfur compounds detected to date are bonded to the coal matrix by only one bond. We believe these sulfur compounds are terminal or pendant groups on macromolecular coal structures. [Pg.317]

To demonstrate the application of these butterfly wing SERS substrates to the problem of protein-binding detection, Garrett et al. devised a protein-binding assay. There are a variety of methods for binding proteins to a metal surface, some of which depend on the amino acid composition of the protein, others of which do not. Direct adsorption via covalent bonds between sulfur groups in proteins and metal surfaces has been used with some success [43] however, this method is unsuitable for use in Raman spectroscopy-based assays, as nonspecific binding may result in a wide variety of conformational orientations of the molecules with respect to the metal s surface. This can lead to Raman spectra that are difficult to reproduce. Not only that, but the analyte may bind to the metal as well as the antibody, which can lead to noisy spectra. [Pg.83]

Detection techniques may be nondestructive or reversible, e.g., iodine or Rhodamine B, or destructive, e.g., sulfuric acid. Detection reagents are usually classified as general, i.e., those that react with a wide variety of different compound types, versus speciftc, i.e., reagents that indicate a particular compound or functional group. Some general reagents are destructive and others are not likewise, there are destructive and nondestructive specific chemical detection reagents. [Pg.698]

The use of an acidic solution of p-anisaldehyde in ethanol to detect aldehyde functionalities on polystyrene polymer supports has been reported (beads are treated with a freshly made solution of p-anisaldehyde (2.55 mL), ethanol (88 mL), sulfuric acid (9 mL), acetic acid (1 mL) and heated at 110°C for 4 min). The colour of the beads depends on the percentage of CHO content such that at 0% of CHO groups, the beads are colourless, -50% CHO content, the beads appear red and at 98% CHO the beads appear burgundy [Vdzquez and Albericio Tetrahedron Lett 42 6691 200]]. A different approach utilises 4-amino-3-hydrazino-5-mercapto-1,2,4-triazole (Purpald) as the visualizing agent for CHO groups. Resins containing aldehyde functionalities turn dark brown to purple after a 5 min reaction followed by a 10 minute air oxidation [Coumoyer et al. J Comb Chem 4 120 2002]. [Pg.76]

The System described in the previous section has been extended with a sulfur chemiluminescence detector (SCO) for the detection of Sulfur compounds (32). The separated fractions were thiols + sulfides + thiophenes (as one group), benzothio-phenes, dibenzothiophenes and benzonaphtho-thiophenes. These four groups have been subsequently injected on-line into and separated by the GC unit. Again, no overlap between these groups has been detected, as can be seen from Figure 14.20, in which the total sulfur compounds are shown and from Figure 14.21 in which the separated dibenzothiophenes fraction is presented. The lower limit of detection of this method proved to be 1 ppm (mg kg ) sulfur per compound. [Pg.397]

The set of Mo(V) EPR signals detected in D. gigas and D. desulfuricans AORs shows close homology with the molybdenum-containing hydroxylase group. Mossbauer and X/Q-band EPR spectroscopic studies 208, 216) complemented the UV/visible and CD studies and the assignment of the [2Fe-2S] arrangement of the iron-sulfur cores. [Pg.400]


See other pages where Sulfur groups, detection is mentioned: [Pg.279]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.785]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.949]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.120]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.72 ]




SEARCH



Sulfur detection

© 2024 chempedia.info