Sugar anions, catalytic activity

Enzyme activity loss because of non-productive adsorption on lignin surface was identified as one of the important factors to decrease enzyme effectiveness, and the effect of surfactants and non-catalytic protein on the enzymatic hydrolysis has been extensively studied to increase the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose into fermentable sugars [7, 9 19]. The reported study showed that the non-ionic surfactant poly(oxyethylene)2o-sorbitan-monooleate (Tween 80) enhanced the enzymatic hydrolysis rate and extent of newspaper cellulose by 33 and 14%, respectively [20]. It was also found that 30% more FPU cellulase activity remained in solution, and about three times more recoverable FPU activity could be recycled with the presence of Tween 80. Tween 80 enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis yields for steam-exploded poplar wood by 20% in the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process [21]. Helle et al. [22] reported that hydrolysis yield increased by as much as a factor of 7, whereas enzyme adsorption on cellulose decreased because of the addition of Tween 80. With the presence of poly(oxyethylene)2o-sorbitan-monolaurate (Tween 20) and Tween 80, the conversions of cellulose and xylan in lime-pretreated com stover were increased by 42 and 40%, respectively [23]. Wu and Ju [24] showed that the addition of Tween 20 or Tween 80 to waste newsprint could increase cellulose conversion by about 50% with the saving of cellulase loading of 80%. With the addition of non-ionic, anionic, and cationic surfactants to the hydrolysis of cellulose (Avicel, tissue paper, and reclaimed paper), Ooshima et al. [25] subsequently found that Tween 20 was the most effective for the enhancement of cellulose conversion, and anionic surfactants did not have any effect on cellulose hydrolysis. With the addition of Tween 20 in the SSF process for... 

The catalytic behavior and the stability of enzymes in reverse micelles are highly dependent on the composition and the structure of the micioanulsion. The activity of entrapped enzymes strongly depends on the water content, the nature of the organic solvent, as well as the nature and the concentration of surfactant. Various surfactants, including the anionic AOT, the cationic CTAB, nonionics such as Triton, Brij, ethoxylated fatty alcohols, and zwitterionic phospholipids (phosphatidylcholine), were used for the preparation of reverse miceUar systems-containing enzymes (Table 13.1). Most inveshgated systans used AOT as the surfactant because its phase behavior is well understood. The activity of some enzymes has been reported to depend on the surfactant concentration and in some cases it was attributed to the interaction of the enzymes with the miceUar membrane [8,26,27]. Recent developments in this area inclnde the use of modified surfactants or their mixtures with other additives and cosurfactants such as alcohols and sugars or the use of aprotic solvents for the reduction of the ionic interactions between the enzyme molecules and the micellar interface in order to improve the enzyme catalytic behavior and operational stabihty [8,17,28-34]. 

---