Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion constant substrate

Fig. 2a-c. Kinetic zone diagram for the catalysis at redox modified electrodes a. The kinetic zones are characterized by capital letters R control by rate of mediation reaction, S control by rate of subtrate diffusion, E control by electron diffusion rate, combinations are mixed and borderline cases b. The kinetic parameters on the axes are given in the form of characteristic currents i, current due to exchange reaction, ig current due to electron diffusion, iji current due to substrate diffusion c. The signpost on the left indicates how a position in the diagram will move on changing experimental parameters c% bulk concentration of substrate c, Cq catalyst concentration in the film Dj, Dg diffusion coefficients of substrate and electrons k, rate constant of exchange reaction k distribution coefficient of substrate between film and solution d> film thickness (from ref. [Pg.64]

Where the condensation coefficient of the vapor is quite small, as for molybdenum and tellurium oxides condensing on the clay loam particles, the initial rate seems to be determined by the combined effect of a slow reaction and slow diffusion of the condensed vapor into the substrate. An equation has been derived which relates the amount of vapor uptake to the condensation coefficient of the vapor onto the substrate material, the equilibrium uptake of the vapor by the substrate material, and the diffusion constant of the condensed vapor in the substrate material. This equation has yet to be tested extensively in other systems, but it does describe successfully the uptake behavior of molybdenum oxide vapor by the clay loam particles. [Pg.69]

The first term on the right-hand side of (2.24) is the diffusion term, where Ds is the effective diffusion constant of the substrate. The second term is called the kinetic (reaction) term. It is necessary to normalize the variables as follows. [Pg.33]

Under these conditions, rate constant k obtained by the first-order kinetic analysis does not reflect the reactivity of a photocatalyst k contains diffusion constant of a substrate and surface area of a substrate (strictly speaking, area of the diffusion layer on the photoirradiated active surface). [Pg.427]

Numerically calculated values of q are available when only substrate diffusion in Michaelis-Menten type kinetics is considered. They can be presented in graphical form, expressing q as a function of the Thiele modulus and of a dimensionless substrate concentration or occasionally in its reciprocal form as a dimensionless Michaelis constant f) according to Lee and Tsao [84] (reviewed in [82,83] see Table 3 for explanation of symbols), hence ... [Pg.113]

Some important conclusions can be drawn for solid-phase EIA (i) the higher the diffusion constant of the substrate, the lower the increase in of the reaction, resulting in an increased reaction rate and, (ii) the accumulation or depletion of ionic species (e.g., protons) influences the reaction rate. Therefore, extreme care should be taken to agitate equally each reaction vessel. This is often more difficult with coated tube assays than with microtitre plates. Shaking of plates during the enzyme reaction may be advantageous. [Pg.167]

Jiang et al. studied the electrodeposition and surface morphology of aluminum on tungsten (W) and aluminum (Al) electrodes from 1 2 M ratio of [Emim]CI/AlCl3 ionic liquids [165,166]. They found that the deposition process of aluminum on W substrates was controlled by instantaneous nucleation with diffusion-controlled growth. It was shown that the electrodeposits obtained on both W and Al electrodes between -0.10 and -0.40 V (vs. AI(III)/A1) are dense, continuous, and well adherent. Dense aluminum deposits were also obtained on Al substrates using constant current deposition between 10 and 70 mA/cm. The current efficiency was found to be dependent on the current density varying from 85% to 100%. Liu et al. showed in similar work that the 20-pm-thick dense smooth aluminum deposition was obtained with current density 200 A/m for 2 h electrolysis [167],... [Pg.133]

Interfacial electron-transfer reactions between polymer-bonded metal complexes and the substrates in solution phase were studied to show colloid aspects of polymer catalysis. A polymer-bonded metal complex often shows a specifically catalytic behavior, because the electron-transfer reactivity is strongly affected by the pol)rmer matrix that surrounds the complex. The electron-transfer reaction of the amphiphilic block copol)rmer-bonded Cu(II) complex with Fe(II)(phenanthroline)3 proceeded due to a favorable entropic contribution, which indicated hydrophobic environmental effect of the copolymer. An electrochemical study of the electron-transfer reaction between a poly(xylylviologen) coated electrode and Fe(III) ion gave the diffusion constants of mass-transfer and electron-exchange and the rate constant of electron-transfer in the macromolecular domain. [Pg.49]

Table II Diffusion constants of substrate (D cm /sec), of electron-exchange (D cm /sec), and rate constants of electron-transfer (kg 1/mol sec) in the macromolecular domain. Table II Diffusion constants of substrate (D cm /sec), of electron-exchange (D cm /sec), and rate constants of electron-transfer (kg 1/mol sec) in the macromolecular domain.
The measurable activity reflects the biocatalytic efficiency of an immobilized enzyme. In homogeneous solution the initial rate of substrate conversion rises linearly with enzyme concentration. The reaction rate is influenced by substrate diffusion only at extremely large degrees of conversion. With immobilized enzymes the measured reaction rate depends not only on the substrate concentration and the kinetic constants Km and vmax but also on so-called immobilization effects. These effects are due to the following alterations of the enzyme by the immobilization process (Kobayashi and Laidler, 1974). [Pg.53]

In the substrate-free situation, Fe is in a low-spin state. The crystal structure indicates that several water molecules or hydroxide ions are present in the active site. One of them occupies the sixth coordination site at Fe. The hexacoordinated low-spin state is presumably achieved by coordinating the strong-field hydroxide ligand, OH , rather than the weak-field ligand, H2O [137]. The low redox potential is due to stabilization of the ferric state by an environment of high dielectric constant, i.e. by the water molecules in the active site [137]. When the camphor substrate diffuses into the enzyme, the change towards a high-spin complex can be followed spectroscopically. A transition to square pyramidal coordination at Fe occurs, and ordered... [Pg.591]


See other pages where Diffusion constant substrate is mentioned: [Pg.4415]    [Pg.4415]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.150]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.166 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.301 ]




SEARCH



Constant Diffusivities

Constant Diffusivity

Diffusion constant

Substrates constant

© 2024 chempedia.info