Mass action Subject

The Langmuir-Hinshelwood picture is essentially that of Fig. XVIII-14. If the process is unimolecular, the species meanders around on the surface until it receives the activation energy to go over to product(s), which then desorb. If the process is bimolecular, two species diffuse around until a reactive encounter occurs. The reaction will be diffusion controlled if it occurs on every encounter (see Ref. 211) the theory of surface diffusional encounters has been treated (see Ref. 212) the subject may also be approached by means of Monte Carlo/molecular dynamics techniques [213]. In the case of activated bimolecular reactions, however, there will in general be many encounters before the reactive one, and the rate law for the surface reaction is generally written by analogy to the mass action law for solutions. That is, for a bimolecular process, the rate is taken to be proportional to the product of the two surface concentrations. It is interesting, however, that essentially the same rate law is obtained if the adsorption is strictly localized and species react only if they happen to adsorb on adjacent sites (note Ref. 214). (The apparent rate law, that is, the rate law in terms of gas pressures, depends on the form of the adsorption isotherm, as discussed in the next section.)... 

The subscript i labels the six concentrations and energies defined previously. It is straightforward to show that by minimising G with respect to the c, subject to the three constraints, we recover the three equations for the q predicted by the law of mass action. 

Polymerisations of undiluted, bulk monomer are rare except for those initiated by ionising radiations and they require a special treatment which will be given later. The most common situation is to have the propagating ions in a mixture of monomer and solvent, and as the solvation by the solvent is ubiquitous and may dominate over that by other components of the reaction mixture, mainly because of the mass-action effect, it will not be noted by any special symbol, except in a few instances. This means that we adopt the convention that the symbol Pn+ denotes a growing cation solvated mainly by the solvent correspondingly kp+ denotes the propagation constant of this species, subject to the proviso at the end of Section 2.3. Its relative abundance depends upon the abundance of the various other species in which the role of the solvent as the primary solvator has been taken over by any or all of the anion or the monomer or the polymer. The extent to which this happens depends on the ionic strength (essentially the concentration of the ions), and the polarity of the solvent, the monomer and the polymer, and their concentrations. 

On a molecular level, reactions occur by coUisions between molecules, and the rate is usually proportional to the density of each reacting molecule. We will return to the subject of reaction mechanisms and elementary reactions in Chapter 4. Here we define elementary reactions more simply and loosely as reactions whose kinetics agree with their stoichiometry. This relationship between stoichiometry and kinetics is sometimes called the Law of Mass Action, although it is by no means a fundamental law of nature, and it is frequently invalid. 

As with all reactions, defect reactions are subject to the law of mass action [see Eq. (3.4) for more details), so an equilibrium constant, Kp, can be written ... 

At a quantitative level, near criticality the FL theory overestimates dissociation largely, and WS theory deviates even more. The same is true for all versions of the PMSA. In WS theory the high ionicity is a consequence of the increase of the dielectric constant induced by dipolar pairs. The direct DD contribution of the free energy favors pair formation [221]. One can expect that an account for neutral (2,2) quadruples, as predicted by the MC studies, will improve the performance of DH-based theories, because the coupled mass action equilibria reduce dissociation. Moreover, quadrupolar ionic clusters yield no direct contribution to the dielectric constant, so that the increase of and the diminution of the association constant becomes less pronounced than estimated from the WS approach. Such an effect is suggested from dielectric constant data for electrolyte solutions at low T [138, 139], but these arguments may be subject to debate [215]. We note that according to all evidence from theory and MC simulations, charged triple ions [260], often assumed to explain conductance minima, do not seem to play a major role in the ion distribution. 

When sodium chloride is dissolved in water at ordinary temperatures, it is practically completely dissociated into sodium and chloride ions which, under the action of an external field, move in opposite directions and independently of each other subject to coulombic interactions. If, however, sodium chloride is dissolved in a solvent of lower dielectric constant, and if the solution is sufficiently dilute, there is an equilibrium between ions and a coulombic compound of the two ions which are commonly termed 4 ion pairs. This equilibrium conforms to the law of mass action when the interaction of the ions with the surrounding ion atmosphere is taken into account. In solvents of very low dielectric constant, such as the hydrocarbons, sodium chloride is not soluble however, many quaternary ammonium salts are quite soluble, and their conductance has been measured. Here at very low concentrations, there also is an equilibrium between ions and ion pairs which conforms to the law of mass action but at higher concentration, in the neighborhood of 1 X 10 W, or below, a minimum occurs in the conductance. Thereafter, it may be shown that the conductance increases continuously up to the molten electrolyte, provided that a suitable electrolyte and solvent are employed which are miscible above the melting point of the electrolyte. 

Like in the case of immunoassays, the MIP-ILAs will be governed by the Law of Mass Action when working at equilibrium so that the reagents are under equilibrium conditions and subject to temperature fluctuations. Shaking can also affect the local concentration of reagents and the reaction rate these factors must be controlled to improve the assay precision. 

While the majority of these concepts are introduced and illustrated based on single-substrate single-product Michaelis-Menten-like reaction mechanisms, the final section details examples of mechanisms for multi-substrate multi-product reactions. Such mechanisms are the backbone for the simulation and analysis of biochemical systems, from small-scale systems of Chapter 5 to the large-scale simulations considered in Chapter 6. Hence we are about to embark on an entire chapter devoted to the theory of enzyme kinetics. Yet before delving into the subject, it is worthwhile to point out that the entire theory of enzymes is based on the simplification that proteins acting as enzymes may be effectively represented as existing in a finite number of discrete states (substrate-bound states and/or distinct conformational states). These states are assumed to inter-convert based on the law of mass action. The set of states for an enzyme and associated biochemical reaction is known as an enzyme mechanism. In this chapter we will explore how the kinetics of a given enzyme mechanism depend on the concentrations of reactants and enzyme states and the values of the mass action rate constants associated with the mechanism. 

Often the key entity one is interested in obtaining in modeling enzyme kinetics is the analytical expression for the turnover flux in quasi-steady state. Equations (4.12) and (4.38) are examples. These expressions are sometimes called Michaelis-Menten rate laws. Such expressions can be used in simulation of cellular biochemical systems, as is the subject of Chapters 5, 6, and 7 of this book. However, one must keep in mind that, as we have seen, these rates represent approximations that result from simplifications of the kinetic mechanisms. We typically use the approximate Michaelis-Menten-type flux expressions rather than the full system of equations in simulations for several reasons. First, often the quasi-steady rate constants (such as Ks and K in Equation (4.38)) are available from experimental data while the mass-action rate constants (k+i, k-i, etc.) are not. In fact, it is possible for different enzymes with different detailed mechanisms to yield the same Michaelis-Menten rate expression, as we shall see below. Second, in metabolic reaction networks (for example), reactions operate near steady state in vivo. Kinetic transitions from one in vivo steady state to another may not involve the sort of extreme shifts in enzyme binding that have been illustrated in Figure 4.7. Therefore the quasi-steady approximation (or equivalently the approximation of rapid enzyme turnover) tends to be reasonable for the simulation of in vivo systems. 

Thermodynamic data, whether determined through calorimetry or solubility studies, are subject to refinement as more exact values for the components in the reaction scheme, or more complete description of the solution phases, become available. Many of the solubility studies on clays were done before digital-computer chemical equilibrium programs were available. One such program, SOLMNEQ, written by one of the authors ( ) solves the mass-action and mass-balance equations for over 200 species simultaneously. SOLMNEQ was employed in this investigation to convert the chemical analytical data into the activities of appropriate ions, ion pairs, and complexes. 

Oakenftill (1984) developed an extension of Equation 6.1 for estimating the size of junction zones in noncovalently cross-linked gels subject to the assumptions (Oakenfull, 1987) (1) The shear modulus can be obtained for very weak gels whose polymer concentration is very low and close to the gel threshold, that is, the polymer chains are at or near to maximum Gaussian behavior. (2) The formation of junction zones is an equilibrium process that is subject to the law of mass action. Oakenfull s expression for the modulus is (Oakenfull, 1984) ... 

This equation (1) can be subjected to a simple transformation. As c soa is ill equilibrium with Csoo and Co, we have, by the law of mass action,... 

Global or complex reactions are not usually well represented by mass action kinetics because the rate results from the combined effect of several simultaneous elementary reactions (each subject to mass action kinetics) that underline the global reaction. The elementary steps include short-lived and unstable intermediate components such as free radicals, ions, molecules, transition complexes, etc. 

Each of the formalisms considered in this subsection—Mass-Action and Michaelis-Menten—is able to serve as the foundation for representing diverse phenomena, but each also has known limitations. The Power-Law Formalism may be considered more fundamental than either of these because it includes them as special cases and is not subject to their limitations. 

Transference numbers will also be found useful in obtaining precise values of the activities of ion constituents. It was another of Arrhenius tacit assumptions that ion concentrations may be used without error in the law of mass action. To investigate the limits of validity of that assumption, and to lay a foundation for the modern interionic attraction theory of solutions, it is necessary to consider the thermodynamics of solutions, and of the galvanic cell, subjects which are discussed in Chapters 5 and 6. 

The theory of chemical reaction appears to have attained a definite form by the end of the previous century, when the mass action law and the Arrhenius theory of activation energy were coordinated in terms of the relevant rate constant. This final form was soon found to be subject to two important limitations. 

A directly observed chemical reaction as expressed by a single stoichiometric equation was identified at that time with a single elementary reaction subject to the mass action law this constituted one of the limitations. Since the beginning of this century, however, it has been realized that a chemical reaction directly observed, if represented by a single stoichiometric equation, is in general a composite of elementary reactions, consisting of a single reaction only in special cases. The removal of this limitation has led to the theory of steady reaction, which provided a number of successful explanations of observed rate laws. 

Lastly, as shown above, complexing reactions should be considered as subjected to the mass action law in consideration of the Boltzmann factor for the solution ions. The Boltzmann factor depends on charge of the inner-sphere complex, and for this reason the complex formation reaction s equilibrium constant (see equation (2.257)) may be determined from the following equation... 

We will take a closer look at this approach using the example of glucose (Fig. 6.7). In its solid and pure state, glucose has a chemical potential which is not subject to mass action. For this reason, it is represented as a horizontal line in the potential diagram. Because, as previously stated, glucose occurs in two forms, a and p, two potential levels lying close together should actually be drawn in. However, for the sake of simplicity, only one is represented here. 

---