Subject zero-order approximation

According to (5-29), pressure //0) depends only on 6, and the problem reduces to the solution of (5-27) and (5-28) subject to boundary conditions (5-20). Equations (5-27) and (5-28) are known as the lubrication (thin-film) equations. We see that they resemble the equations for unidirectional flow. However, in this case, the boundaries are not required to be parallel. Thus uf can be a function of the stream wise variable 0, and will not be zero in general. Furthermore, because uf is a function of 9, so is dp(i))/<)(). Finally, whereas the unidirectional flow equations are exact, the lubrication equations are only the leading-order approximation to the exact equations of motion and continuity in the asymptotic, thin-gap limit, e 0. 

Wade et al. (1993) simulated concentration data for 100 subjects under a one-compartment steady-state model using either first-or zero-order absorption. Simulated data were then fit using FO-approximation with a first-order absorption model having ka fixed to 0.25-, 0.5-, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4 times the true ka value. Whatever value ka was fixed equal to, clearance was consistently biased, but was relatively robust with underpredictions of the true value by less than 5% on average. In contrast, volume of distribution was very sensitive to absorption misspecification, but only when there were samples collected in the absorption phase. When there were no concentration data in the absorption phase, significant parameter bias was not observed for any parameter. The variance components were far more sensitive to model misspecification than the parameter estimates with some... 

In this section, the discussion will begin with the simplest case that can realistically be considered—a zero-order irreversible chemical reaction. In this example, the reaction rate is a function only of temperature until all reactant is consumed and the reaction stops. The exact fimction governing the temperature dependence of the reaction rate is not defined in this initial analysis, but it can be, it is assumed approximated to be linear over the small temperature interval of the modulation. The more general case where the chemical reaction can be considered to be a function of time (and therefore conversion) and temperature is then treated. Finally, the Arrhenius equation is dealt with, as this is the most relevant case to the subject of this book. 

This is written out in order to make the next point. The first and last equation in the set are superfluous, because the boundary concentrations Co and C/y I are not subject to diffusion changes, but to other conditions. Also, where the boundary values appear in the other equations, they must be replaced with what we can substitute for them. The outer boundary value, C/y I, is (almost always) equal to the initial bulk concentration C, usually equal to unity in its dimensionless form. This means that the last term in each equation separates out as a constant term and makes for a constant vector [Hgw+iC II 2,n+iC. .. H jv+iC ]7, which will be called Z here. The concentration at the electrode Co is handled according to the boundary condition. For Cottrell, for example, it is set to zero throughout and thus simply drops out of the set. For other conditions, for example constant current or an irreversible reaction, a gradient C is involved, as described in Chap. 6. In that chapter, the gradient was expressed as a possibly multipoint approximation,... 

Note that the stiffness coefficients are now evaluated at the strained reference state (as signified by the notation dEtot/ Ria)v) rather than for the state of zero strain considered in our earlier treatment of the harmonic approximation. To make further progress, we specialize the discussion to the case of a crystal subject to a homogeneous strain for which the deformation gradient is a multiple of the identity (i.e. strict volume change given by F = A,I). We now reconsider the stiffness coefficients, but with the aim of evaluating them about the zero strain reference state. For example, we may rewrite the first-order term via Taylor expansion as... 

The amplitude of the laser-cooled ion is enhanced resonantly near o)+ and 0) with maxima shifted from co+ and co by an amount that increases with y,. The resonance width is approximately y,. The in-phase amplitude has a dispersive shape, as for identical ions, and when only the laser-cooled ion is subject to a driving force (excitation by laser modulation) the amplitude has a zero-crossing at C0+ and co. For electrode excitation, where both ions are driven, the zero-crossing is offset from co+ or co by an amount that, for yi/co+ 1 is of the order of (yi/co+J. Intuitively, such an offset is present because, when both ions are driven, the driven motion of the non-cooled ion perturbs the phase of the laser-cooled ion. In contrast, when only one ion is driven, the other ion is pulled or pushed into phase with the driven ion. 

To a first approximation this leads to the fraction of incident light being reflected as simply (m - l)y(n + 1) and approaches zero as the refractive index approaches unity. The response of a plane surface to an incident beam of light is complicated, as briefly described previously. Mineral fillers, however, complicate the subject even more deeply in that they are a priori made up of particles that usually have sizes in the order of the wavelengths of visible light. Thus large surfaces will reflect and transmit the light waves but particles will scatter them. 

---