Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Subject structure simulation

Having previously introduced the key methods to determine the important variables with respect to stress and strength distributions, the most acceptable way to predict mechanical component reliability is by applying SSI theory (Dhillon, 1980). SSI analysis is one of the oldest methods to assess structural reliability, and is the most commonly used method because of its simplicity, ease and economy (Murty and Naikan, 1997 Sundararajan and Witt, 1995). It is a practical engineering tool used for quantitatively predicting the reliability of mechanical components subjected to mechanical loading (Sadlon, 1993) and has been described as a simulative model of failure (Dasgupta and Pecht, 1991). [Pg.176]

By far the most common methods of studying aqueous interfaces by simulations are the Metropolis Monte Carlo (MC) technique and the classical molecular dynamics (MD) techniques. They will not be described here in detail, because several excellent textbooks and proceedings volumes (e.g., [2-8]) on the subject are available. In brief, the stochastic MC technique generates microscopic configurations of the system in the canonical (NYT) ensemble the deterministic MD method solves Newton s equations of motion and generates a time-correlated sequence of configurations in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble. Structural and thermodynamic properties are accessible by both methods the MD method provides additional information about the microscopic dynamics of the system. [Pg.349]

Performance of plastics , W. Brostow Hanser Gardner Pubis (1999) ISBN 1569902771. Comprehensively covers the behavior of the most important polymer materials. Subject areas range from Computer Simulations of Mechanical Behavior to Reliability and Durability of aircraft structures made of fiber-reinforced hydrocarbons. [Pg.599]

We can arrive at our theories in two main ways. In the first, as illustrated earlier, we subject a system to experimental perturbations, tests, and intrusions, thereby leading to patterns of observables from which we may concoct a theory of the system s structure and function. An alternative approach, made possible by the dramatic advances that have occurred in the area of computer hardware in recent times, is to construct a computer model of the system and then to carry out simulations of its behavior under different conditions. The computer experiments can lead to observables that may be interpreted as though they were derived from interactions. [Pg.5]

Figure 21.3 Modeling and simulation in the general context of the study of xenobiot-ics. The network of signals and regulatory pathways, sources of variability, and multistep regulation that are involved in this problem is shown together with its main components. It is important to realize how between-subject and between-event variation must be addressed in a model of the system that is not purely structural, but also statistical. The power of model-based data analysis is to elucidate the (main) subsystems and their putative role in overall regulation, at a variety of life stages, species, and functional (cell to organismal) levels. Images have been selected for illustrative purposes only. See color plate. Figure 21.3 Modeling and simulation in the general context of the study of xenobiot-ics. The network of signals and regulatory pathways, sources of variability, and multistep regulation that are involved in this problem is shown together with its main components. It is important to realize how between-subject and between-event variation must be addressed in a model of the system that is not purely structural, but also statistical. The power of model-based data analysis is to elucidate the (main) subsystems and their putative role in overall regulation, at a variety of life stages, species, and functional (cell to organismal) levels. Images have been selected for illustrative purposes only. See color plate.
One of the important limitations of these methods, in their current state of development, is the necessity to conduct a new coarse-graining for each new type of polymer that is simulated. Major opportunities to increase the utility of this class of simulations lie in the development of methods, which make the mapping to the coarse-grained structure (and the reverse-mapping back to the structure expressed in fully atomistic detail) as general (and painless) as possible when new polymers are treated. This area is the subject of continuing work by all four groups. [Pg.154]


See other pages where Subject structure simulation is mentioned: [Pg.556]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.1141]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.648]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.179]   


SEARCH



Structure simulation models using Subject

Subject simulation

Subject structural

© 2024 chempedia.info