Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Subject polymer matrix surface

In recent years the electrochemistry of the enzyme membrane has been a subject of great interest due to its significance in both theories and practical applications to biosensors (i-5). Since the enzyme electrode was first proposed and prepared by Clark et al. (6) and Updike et al. (7), enzyme-based biosensors have become a widely interested research field. Research efforts have been directed toward improved designs of the electrode and the necessary membrane materials required for the proper operation of sensors. Different methods have been developed for immobilizing the enzyme on the electrode surface, such as covalent and adsorptive couplings (8-12) of the enzymes to the electrode surface, entrapment of the enzymes in the carbon paste mixture (13 etc. The entrapment of the enzyme into a conducting polymer has become an attractive method (14-22) because of the conducting nature of the polymer matrix and of the easy preparation procedure of the enzyme electrode. The entrapment of enzymes in the polypyrrole film provides a simple way of enzyme immobilization for the construction of a biosensor. It is known that the PPy-... [Pg.139]

A much more desirable erosion mechanism is surface erosion, where hydrolysis is confined to a narrow zone at the periphery of the device. Then, if the drug is weU-immobihzed in the matrix so that drug release due to diffusion is minimal, the release rate is completely controlled by polymer erosion, and an ability to control erosion rate would translate into an ability to control dmg delivery rate. For a polymer matrix that is very hydrophobic so that water penetration is limited to the surface (thus Hmiting bulk erosion), and at the same time, allowing polymer hydrolysis to proceed rapidly, it should be possible to achieve a drug release rate that is controlled by the rate of surface erosion. Two classes of biodegradable polymers successfully developed based on this rationale are the polyanhydrides [31] and poly (ortho esters) [32], the latter of which is the subject of this chapter. [Pg.1491]

Structural changes in the MPE are induced by two competing processes. Firstly, by the increasing crystallinity under the effect of the polarizing electric field and, secondly, by the formation of the volume charge and permeation of metal atoms into the polymer matrix bulk, which hampers crystallization in the surface layers. Evidently, just these variations in the degree of crystallinity can be a reason for improved physical-mechanical (strength, adhesion) and physical-chemical (sorption, diffusion) characteristics of the materials subjected to polarization in contact with unlike metals. [Pg.282]

The major drawback of cellulose fibers in the present context resides in their highly polar and hydrophilic character, which make them both poorly compatible with commonly used non-polar matrices, such as polyolefins, and subject to loss of mechanical properties upon atmospheric moisture absorption. That is why they should be submitted to specific surface modifications in order to obtain an efficient hydrophobic barrier and to minimize their interfacial energy with the often nonpolar polymer matrix, and thus generate optimum adhesion. Further improvement of this interfacial strength, which is a basic requirement for the optimized mechanical performance of any composite, is attained by chain entanglement between the matrix macromolecules and the long chains appended to the fiber surface (brushes) or, better still, by the establishment of a continuity of covalent bonds at the interface between the two components of the composite. [Pg.400]

The action of active fillers can be attributed to three causes [53-56], namely (1) chemical bond formation between filler and material is to be reinforced (2) immobilization of polymer segments attached to the filler surface by secondary or primary valence bonds, leading to a possible structuring of the polymer matrix, an interfacial layer with characteristic properties thus appearing (the increase of Jg values is a proof for this assumption) (3) when the polymer molecules are subjected to stress with energy absorption, they can slide off the filler surface the impact energy is thus uniformly distributed and the impact strength increased. [Pg.594]


See other pages where Subject polymer matrix surface is mentioned: [Pg.103]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.742]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.1533]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.1012]    [Pg.417]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.777 ]




SEARCH



Polymer Subject

Polymer matrices

Subject matrices

Subject surface

© 2024 chempedia.info