Subject carbene transfer reactions

As already mentioned for rhodium carbene complexes, proof of the existence of electrophilic metal carbenoids relies on indirect evidence, and insight into the nature of intermediates is obtained mostly through reactivity-selectivity relationships and/or comparison with stable Fischer-type metal carbene complexes. A particularly puzzling point is the relevance of metallacyclobutanes as intermediates in cyclopropane formation. The subject is still a matter of debate in the literature. Even if some metallacyclobutanes have been shown to yield cyclopropanes by reductive elimination [15], the intermediacy of metallacyclobutanes in carbene transfer reactions is in most cases borne out neither by direct observation nor by clear-cut mechanistic studies and such a reaction pathway is probably not a general one. Formation of a metallacyclobu-tane requires coordination both of the olefin and of the carbene to the metal center. In many cases, all available evidence points to direct reaction of the metal carbenes with alkenes without prior olefin coordination. Further, it has been proposed that, at least in the context of rhodium carbenoid insertions into C-H bonds, partial release of free carbenes from metal carbene complexes occurs [16]. Of course this does not exclude the possibility that metallacyclobutanes play a pivotal role in some catalyst systems, especially in copper-and palladium-catalyzed reactions. 

Synthesis of the chiral catalysts to introduce enantioselectivity in carbene transfer reactions is a subject of great interest. Often copper and rhodium chiral catalysts are of choice for the carbene transfer reactions. In some reports, immobilized chiral dirhodium (II) catalyst were employed successfully in asymmetric cyclopropanation reactions. Ubeda and coworkers reported the immobilization of chiral Rh2(02CR)2(PC)2 (PC = ort/io-metalated phosphine) compounds on cross-linked polystyrene (PS) resin by an... 

When 2,2-dichloro-3-phenylpropanal 203 is subjected to standard reaction conditions with chiral triazolium salt 75c, the desired amide is produced in 80% ee and 62% yield Eq. 20. This experiment suggests that the catalyst is involved in an enantioselec-tive protonation event. With this evidence in hand, the proposed mechanism begins with carbene addition to the a-reducible aldehyde followed by formation of activated car-boxylate XLII (Scheme 32). Acyl transfer occurs with HOAt, presumably due to its higher kinetic nucleophilicity under these conditions, thus regenerating the carbene. In turn, intermediate XLin then undergoes nucleophilic attack by the amine and releases the co-catalyst back into the catalytic cycle. 

The thrust of this chapter deals with reactions of Fischer carbene complexes that have been the subject of kinetic and/or thermodynamic studies. The number of these is relatively limited. They include the reactions of equations (1) and (4), proton transfers that generate carbanions such as 5 (see equation 2), reactions at the metal center such as the loss or exchange of ligands as well as rearrangement reactions. 

The mechanism of carbonyl methylenation with dimethyltitanocene 30 is one of the major subjects of discussion in titanium-carbene chemistry. Two reaction pathways have been proposed. Based on the observation of H/D scrambling in reactions using a deuterated ester and Cp2Ti(CD3)2, Petasis proposed that the reaction proceeds by methyl transfer to form the adduct 31 and subsequent elimination of methane and titanocene oxide (Scheme 4.29, Path A) [64]. Later, a detailed study by Hughes and co-workers using and D-labeled compounds showed that the methylenation of esters with 30 proceeds via a titanium carbene mechanism (Path B) [82]. 

---