Structured packing features

Crystal packing features of NCP and implications for higher order chromatin structure... 

The combination of PDMS and urease enzyme to form a microreactor from the resulting "bioplastic" material (PDMS-E) has been reported previously (7). When enzyme concentrations were maintained at 2.5% (w/w) or less, the resulting microreactor cured with good structural integrity and high definition (e.g., well-formed microchannels and >90% retention of triangular transverse packing features in the microchannels). 

To build up a hydrodynamic analogy for columns equipped with SP, substantial features of the fluid flow have to be revealed and captured. Let us consider an example of a gas/vapor-liquid (reactive) separation unit filled with a non-catalytic structured packing (Shilkin and Kenig, 2005a). 

Surface features. The surfaces of a few structured packings are smooth (e.g., Fig. 8.10a,g). Most structured packings have a roughened or enhanced surface that assists the lateral spread of liquid, promotes film turbulence, and enhances the area available for mass transfer. Laboratory measurements of absorption rates showed that both mass transfer efficiency and wetted area are enhanced by texturing metal surfaces (28). The extent to which mass transfer was improved varied with the type of texturing used. Texturing employed by... 

Structured packings have replaced trays and random packings as their cost has decreased and more is known of their performance behavior. Initially thought to be appropriate only for high vacuum distillations, they are now used for absorbers, strippers, and pressure distillations. Because of their open structure (over 90% voids) and large specific surface areas, their mass transfer efficiency is high when proper distribution of liquid and gas over the cross section can be maintained. Table 13.15 shows a comparison of features of several commercial makes of structured packings. 

For particle size distributions of any type the optimal (i.e. densest) packing is obtained if it becomes random. A random packing of particles is characterized by the condition that the structure of an arbitrary volume element must not be different from that of any other volume element. Therefore, a sufficiently large volume element of a random packing features homogeneous structure and, respectively, constant porosity. 

If the protofibrils, i.e., the coiled polypeptide chains with their bristling side chains, do indeed pack in hexagonal or pseudohexagonal fashion over fibrillar cross sections, as illustrated in Fig. 31, this should be most obvious in the production of diffraction row lines with characteristic spatial relationships. Unfortunately, the intra- and interproto-fibrillar distortions, which are not unexpected because of side-chain variability, are sufficiently bad to cause the rapid deterioration in diffraction encountered as the distance from the meridian increases. Thus, the number of observed row lines is insufficient to test the hexagonal packing features of the proposed structure. 

For h -capacity structured packu of unique geometry, such as the Norton Intaloix 2T and the Ja er MaxPac, Eq. (8.1) consia-tentty predicts flood points that are 6 to 10 percent low (31b,60n). Al-tfaou this is well within the correlation accuracy, it suggests that Eq. (8.1) does not distu piish the tmique hi capacity features of these two structured packings. 

---