Structure of the Heterogeneous Regions

Both positional linkages (uronic acid to hexosamine and hexosamine to uronic acid) were established as being (1 4) by structural analysis of the previously mentioned (see Section IV), crystalline disaccharides containing D-glucuronic acid, isolated from an acid hydrolyzate of carboxyl-reduced heparin.Further evidence was obtained from the structure of the D-glucuronic acid-containing counterpart of disaccharides 6 and 8, obtained as minor products from pig-mucosal heparin following nitrous acid deamination, and acid hydrolysis followed by N-acetylation, respectively. 

Whereas the configuration at C-1 of the amino sugar units in heparin was established as a-o by early studies, especially the structural characterization of crystalline disaccharide 9, the configuration of the D-glu-curonic acid has been the subject of controversy. It was originally presumed to be a-D, on the basis of the structure proposed for a disaccharide obtained, in addition to 9, from desulfated, carboxyl-reduced heparin.  

In contrast to L-iduronic acid residues, most of which are sulfated at C-2, D-glucuronic acid residues in heparin and heparan sulfate are largely or exclusively nonsulfated. This was especially proved by their susceptibility to periodate oxidation, and through characterization of D-glucuronic acid-containing di- and tetra-saccharides from deamina-tive or heparinase - heparanase cleavage - of heparin. 

Although usually less prominent than D-glucuronic acid, nonsulfated L-iduronic acid (probably incorporated as in 3) is also a constituent of irregular regions of heparin, - - and accounts for up to 20% of some heparan sulfate species. - -  

The amino sugar counterparts of D-glucuronic acid and nonsulfated L-iduronic acid in heparin are either N-acetylated, or nonsulfated at C-6, or both. 2-Acetamido-2-deoxy-D-glucosyl residues account for only a minor proportion of the total hexosamine in heparin, and are especially low in beef-lung preparations (see Table H). - - - In contrast, they 

---

The topics covered are as follows. The structure of the interfacial region and its experimental investigation are covered in Chapter 1. The following chapter reviews the mechanisms by which heterogeneous catalysis of solution reactions can take place. The third chapter is concerned with the mechanism and kinetics of crystal growth from solution and the final contribution deals with corrosion processes at the metal-solution interface. 

On the basis of the observations in the macroscale, the flow of a fast fluidized bed can be represented by the core-annulus flow structure in the radial direction, and coexistence of a bottom dense region and a top dilute region in the axial direction. Particle clusters are an indication of the heterogeneity in the mesoscale. A complete characterization of the hydrodynamics of a CFB requires the determination of the voidage and velocity profiles. There are a number of mathematical models accounting for the macro- or mesoaspects of the flow pattern in a CFB that are available. In the following, basic features of several types of models are discussed. 

Once the nature of the reacting species has been established, the difficulties become more formidable. This is of course due to the heterogeneous nature of electrode processes which makes it necessary to take the composition and structure of the electrified interface (abbreviated El) into account. Although this region is a very narrow layer, 10-15 A thick, all the important events occur here, and hence it is of central importance to try to understand how it can influence the outcome of the electrochemical reaction. 

---