Structure constants canonical

In 1984, it was also realized that it was possible to transform the original, so called bare (or canonical), structure constants into other types of structure constants using so-called screening transformations [53]. This allowed one to trans-... 

In actual calculations one does not solve this equation, but instead calculates the poles of the scattering path operator to the kink matrix. Nevertheless, it is clear that we need to find an expression for the slope matrix. This can be derived from the bare (or canonical) KKR structure constant matrix Sr,l,rl(k2), and this will be shown below, as well as how to compute the first energy derivative of the slope matrix. 

In 1973 Andersen and Woolley [1.25] extended the LCMTO method to molecular calculations. At the end of their paper they introduced that choice of MTO tail, i.e. proportional to J = 9i/j/9E, which in a natural fashion ensured orthogonality to the core states and at the same time led to an accurate and elegant formulation of linear methods. The resulting, technique was immediately developed in a paper by Andersen [1.26] which, in a condensed form, contains most of what one need know about the simple concepts of linear band theory. Thus, we find here the KKR equation within the atomic-sphere approximation at this stage is called ASM the LCMTO secular matrix, latter called the LMTO matrix the energy-independent structure constants and the canonical bands and the Laurent expansion of the logarithmic-derivative function and the corresponding potential parameters. 

In Chap.2 I deal with the simplest aspects of the LMTO method based upon the KKR-ASA equations. The intention is to familiarise the reader with the concepts and language used in linear theory. This is where I introduce structure constants, potential functions, canonical bands, and potential parameters, and where it is shown that the energy-band problem may be separated into a potential-dependent part and a crystal-structure-dependent part. 

In Chap.6 the atomic-sphere approximation is introduced and discussed, canonical structure constants are presented, and it is shown that the LMTO-ASA and KKR-ASA equations are mathematically equivalent in the sense that the KKR-ASA matrix is a factor of the LMTO-ASA secular matrix. In addition, we treat muffin-tin orbitals in the ASA, project out the i character of the eigenvectors, derive expressions for the spherically averaged electron density, and develop a correction to the ASA. 

Fig.2.2. Lay-out for the canonical structure constant matrix in the m representation (a), and in the i representation (b). In the latter the diagonal exhibits the canonical s, p, and d bands...

Fig.2.13. Illustration of how a projected state density N, which includes hybridisation, may be scaled into a hybridised canonical fc-state density No by the potential function P (E). The relevant equations are (2.12), which relates energy and structure constants, and (2.40), which relates Jl-projected energy and canonical state densities...

As shown in [6.6] the LMTO-ASA Hamiltonian matrix may be transformed into the two-centre form [6.7] where the hopping integrals are products of potential parameters and the canonical structure constants. This result was already stated in Sect.2.5. A less accurate two-centre approximation based upon the KKR-ASA equations will be presented in Sect.8.1.2. The canonical structure constants which, after multipiication by the appropriate potential parameters, form the two-centre hopping integrals are 1 isted in Table 6.1. The... 

Table 6.1. Canonical structure constants [6.8,9],in the two-centre notation of Stater and Roster [6.7]. The present, real structure constants are equal to those defined in (6.7,8.8) times 1 and S(a m, dm) = (-)t + S(dm,d m ), where m refers to the angular momentum. The vector from the first to the second orbital has a length R, and direction cosines i, m, and n. The distance S, which also enters the definition of the potential functions, is arbitrary. The entries not given in the table may be found by cyclically permuting the coordinates and direction cosines... 

The STR may be used to calculate the canonical structure constants defined by (6.7-9) or (8.23,24). In a typical application the programme is executed once for a given crystal structure. It produces and stores on disk or tape a set of structure-constant matrices distributed on a suitable grid in the irreducible wedge of the Brillouin zone. Whenever that particular crystal structure is encountered, the structure constant matrices may be retrieved and used to set up the LMTO eigenvalue problem which, in turn, leads to the energy bands of the material considered. 

The basic input to STR is the translational vectors spanning the unit cell of the crystal, and the basis vectors giving the positions of the individual atoms in the cell. With this information STR may in principle be used to calculate canonical structure constants of any crystal structure, the only limitation being that central processor time grows rapidly as the number of atoms per cell is increased. 

The basic output from STR is the canonical structure constants used in CANON and LMTO to calculate band structures. In addition, STR produces a file with real and reciprocal space vectors which is used by the combined correction term programme COR. This file may also be read by STR next time the same crystal structure is encountered, thus saving the time used to generate these vectors. 

Let us assume that the programme STR has been successfully compiled, and that the user wants to calculate and store the canonical structure constants for the bcc structure. Let us further assume that the data files needed have been created according to the attributes given in the listing, Sect.9.2.2. The user is now faced with the problem of generating the input data necessary to make the programme run. To help him choose the correct value of the various variables, Table 9.2 lists input data for four different cases explained in detail below. 

Berardi et al. [66] have also investigated the influence of central dipoles in discotic molecules. This system was studied using canonical Monte Carlo simulations at constant density over a range of temperatures for a system of 1000 molecules. Just as in discotic systems with no dipolar interaction, isotropic, nematic and columnar phases are observed, although at the low density studied the columnar phase has cavities within the structure. This effect was discovered in an earlier constant density investigation of the phase behaviour of discotic Gay-Berne molecules and is due to the signiflcant difference between the natural densities of the columnar and nematic phases... 

The presence of an (applied) potential at the aqueous/metal interface can, in addition, result in significant differences in the reaction thermodynamics, mechanisms, and structural topologies compared with those found in the absence of a potential. Modeling the potential has been a challenge, since most of today s ab initio methods treat chemical systems in a canonical form whereby the number of electrons are held constant, rather than in the grand canonical form whereby the potential is held constant. Recent advances have been made by mimicking the electrochemical model... 

---