Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Structural synthesis hierarchy

The goal of plantwide control structure synthesis is to develop feasible control structures that address the objectives of the entire chemical plant and account for the interactions associated with complex recycle and heat integration schemes, and the expected multivariate nature of the plant. Many strategies have been proposed for accomplishing this task, and the majority of them have been demonstrated using dynamic process simulations. However, none have been accepted as the universal approach, in a manner similar to the steady-state process design synthesis hierarchy of Douglas [1]. [Pg.377]

Since these initial contributions, many works followed, which may be classified into three broad categories (1) Control structure development based mainly on process experience and engineering judgment [7], (2) Control structure development that follows the guidelines of the steady-state process design synthesis hierarchy [1], and (3) Control structure development that relies on a mathematical formulation based on dynamic system theory, optimization, and control-theoretic systems analysis. Some contributions can be classified in more than one category. [Pg.377]

Similarly to catalysis, the properties of these composite materials are also determined by a hierarchy of structures on very different length/time scales. Therefore, linking mesoscale molecular models and continuum descriptions is relevant for their understanding and optimization. Together with advanced synthesis methods and functional testing, it is thus necessary also to develop new improved computational methods to provide an understanding of materials properties and to assist in the development of new functional materials. [Pg.403]

The speed of provision of the feed molecules to the adsorption/catalytic sites must be balanced with engineering issues such as pressure drop in a reactor/ adsorber, so the parhcle size and pore structure of engineered forms must be optimized for each appHcation. A hierarchy of diffusion mechanisms interplays in processes using formed zeoHtes. Micropore, molecular, Knudsen and surface diffusion mechanisms are all more or less operative, and the rate Hmifing diffusion mechanism in each case is directly affected by synthesis and post-synthesis manufacturing processes. Additional details are provided in Chapter 9. [Pg.68]

The hierarchy of protein structure is illustrated in hgure 11.4. Here too we have a wealth of structural information. The quaternary structures for many proteins are now known and generally available in databases. As complex as these are, this is not the end of the story. We have atom-by-atom structures for entities as complex as viruses and the ribosome, an intracellular RNA-protein complex and the site of protein synthesis. Modem structural biology continues to provide detailed insights into some of the most complex constracts of nature. We are better off for having these insights. [Pg.141]

From the above discussions it is clear that the amine has an important role in the formation of open-framework metal phosphates. Recent studies from this laboratory have shown that in the family of zinc phosphates, almost all the members in the hierarchy of open-framework structures can be synthesized using the same structure-directing agent, triethylenetetramine (TETA) [32], In Fig. 7.18 we show all the structures obtained with TETA along with the relative concentrations of the amine and the phosphoric acid employed in the synthesis. We see that the one-dimensional (ladder) and the two-dimensional (layer) structures are obtained when the relative concentration of phosphoric acid is high with the ratio of concentrations of the acid and the amine in the range 3 1-4 1. This is in contrast to the three-dimensional structures where the ratio... [Pg.231]

A number of experimental chemical process synthesis procedures have been developed with a hierarchical architecture based on both the hierarchical structure of the chemical innovation process and the physical property hierarchy. Examples include PIP (Kirkwood et al, 1988) and BALTAZAR (Mahalec and Motard, 1977). This hierarchical approach is also evident in the Pinch Technology Onion Diagram (Linnhoff and Ahmad, 1983). The hierarchical approach is also the foundation for the two early textbooks on process synthesis methodology (Rudd et al, 1973 Douglas, 1988). [Pg.17]

There is a wide range of so-called bottom-up methods for achieving complex structural hierarchies within polyfluorene nanostructures. Synthesis of block... [Pg.262]

Recently, the author advocated the application of the systems approach in the analysis and synthesis of a biotechnological process ( 1). The hierarchy of a biological system involves structural, functional, descriptive, control and dynamic organization. Structural and functional hierarchies of a biotechnological process are depicted in Tables I and II. In Table II a compartmental level is omitted. This is possible as long as the translocation of substances between organelles and cytoplasm is not important. The scheme of functions should be understood in both directions,... [Pg.355]

Programming the SBB with a hierarchy of appropriate information to promote the synthesis of targeted structures, while simultaneously avoiding other easily attainable nets, represents a significant advancement in framework design. Of special interest in crystal chemistry are edge-transitive nets since they are simple networks composed of one kind of edge. ... [Pg.2424]

The chapter is organized as follows. Section 2 presents brief reviews of the hierarchical steady-state design structure and a particular plantwide control synthesis structure. Both have relevance to this work. The former because some of the plantwide control methods rely on this hierarchy, and the latter to complement the proposed approach. Section 3 begins with preliminaries that define the state of the process design flowsheet, the modified Analytical Hierarchical Process (mAHP) method used for assessment, and the process flowsheet... [Pg.375]

The sequential control logic required at each level of a control hierarchy in batch plants is still largely derived manually, perhaps with the aid of some structured approach. This is a time consuming and error prone activity in which safety issues are difficult to treat formally and efficiently. To overcome these problems, Alsop et al [21] and Sanchez and Machietto [22] proposed a formal method for computer aided synthesis of sequential control logic for processes modelled as state-transition systems such as the co-ordination control of batch processes. [Pg.516]


See other pages where Structural synthesis hierarchy is mentioned: [Pg.18]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.763]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.3237]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.11]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.84 ]




SEARCH



Hierarchy

Structural hierarchy

© 2024 chempedia.info