Strength of diamond

Mechanical Properties. Measuremeat of the mechanical properties of diamoad is compHcated, and references should be consulted for the vahous qualifications (7,34). Table 1 compares the theoretical and experimental bulk modulus of diamond to that for cubic BN and for SiC (29) and compares the compressive strength of diamond to that for cemented WC, and the values for the modulus of elasticity E to those for cemented WC and cubic BN. 

One of the peculiarities of the natural diamond is a considerably lower content of admixtures Ni, Mn, oth. as compared to the synthetic diamond. It is this feature that determines its raised resistance to the action of high temperature in the combustion wave. Figure 3 shows the dependencies of the recuperated synthetic and natural diamond strength on the mass proportion of the charge layers mi/m2 with diamond concentration equal to 25 % vol. on the example of the bi-layered composite with the ceramic binder (Ti,Mo)Ca. The strength of diamond grains is also affected by mi/m is the composites with the binder of NiAl, TiB+Ti, TiC-l-TiAl, TiB2+Si. 

Figure 8.7 I The carbon atoms in diamond are joined by covalent bonds, and each atom displays the same tetrahedral geometry we saw in Chapter 7 for molecules like methane. Fracmring a diamond crystal requires breaking many covalent bonds, and this explains the inordinately high strength of diamond.

The structure of diamond was already determined as a tetrahedral structure in 1913 by W.H. BRAGG and W.L. BRAGG (1). We know today that this arrangement ot the carbon atoms indicates sp3-hy-bridization of the binding electrons of carbon as in non aromatic carbon hydrogen compounds. The strong covalent C/C-bonds in four equivalent directions cause the well known isotropic strength of diamond. 

Strong materials either have a high intrinsic strength, /, (like diamond), or they rely on the superposition of. solid solution strengthening obstacles fo and work-hardening f i, (like high-tensile steels). But before we can use this information, one problem... 

Fig. 6.1. Yield strengths of the five polymers are plotted against 1/MC that is the inverse molecular mass between crosslinks. The diamond represents polymer E. Test temperature 23 °C. a and b represent results of flexural tests on small samples (thickness 1.3 mm) a annealed, b quenched,...

Intermolecular forces are responsible for the existence of several different phases of matter. A phase is a form of matter that is uniform throughout in both chemical composition and physical state. The phases of matter include the three common physical states, solid, liquid, and gas (or vapor), introduced in Section A. Many substances have more than one solid phase, with different arrangements of their atoms or molecules. For instance, carbon has several solid phases one is the hard, brilliantly transparent diamond we value and treasure and another is the soft, slippery, black graphite we use in common pencil lead. A condensed phase means simply a solid or liquid phase. The temperature at which a gas condenses to a liquid or a solid depends on the strength of the attractive forces between its molecules. 

Thus we have shown that when s and p orbitals are available and s—p quantization is broken an atom can form four (or fewer) equivalent bonds which are directed towards tetrahedron corners. To the approximation involved in these calculations the strength of a bond is independent of the nature of other bonds. This result gives us at once the justification for the tetrahedral carbon atom and other tetrahedral atoms, such as silicon, germanium, and tin in the diamond-type crystals of the elements and, in general, all atoms in tetrahedral structures. 

Under high pressure and temperature, boron nitride can be converted to a cubic form. The cubic form of (BN) is known as borazon, and it has a structure similar to that of diamond. Its hardness is similar to that of diamond, and it is stable to higher temperatures. The extreme hardness results from the fact that the B-N bonds possess not only the covalent strength comparable to C-C bonds, but also some ionic stabilization due to the difference in electronegativity between B and N. 

A close estimate of the dynamic correlation energy was obtained by a simple formula in terms of pair populations and correlation contributions within and between localized molecular orbitals. The orbital and orbital-pair correlation strengths rapidly decrease with the distance between the orbitals in a pair. For instance, the total valence correlation energy of diamond per carbon atom, estimated as 164 mh, is the result of 84 mh from intra-orbital contributions, 74.5 mh from inter-orbital closest neighbors contributions, and 6.1 mh from interorbital vicinal contributions. The rapid decay of the orbital correlation contributions with the distance between the localized orbitals explains the near-... 

---