Strategic recommendations

The strategic recommendations relating to on-line coupling and feedbacks include the following ... 

The U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) has prepared strategic recommendations for, and responses to, biological and chemical terrorism (Khan et al., 2000). They identified the following five main activities that should be undertaken by public health organizations to enhance preparedness for terrorist chemical attacks ... 

The US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has prepared strategic recommendations relating to... 

Strategic Recommendations for Immediate, Short, Medium, and Long Range... 

Two longer-term strategic recommendations were included in the ACE report (1) institute an education and research council to plan for corrosion education and to identify resources to execute the plan and (2) encourage the corrosion research community to reach out to the larger science and engineering community and communicate the challenges it faces. 

Additional benefit is gained by applying the model to a number of similar low-consequence events, to assess what would otherwise be a set of imielated safety concerns and to develop strategic recommendations for safety improvements (Gibb and DeLandre, 2003). 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Biological and Chemical Terrorism Strategic Plan for Preparedness and Response. Recommendations of the CDC Strategic Planning Workgroup." Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 49 (RR-4) (2000) 1-14. 

The recommended experimental evaluation is condensed in a number of flow charts following in which, in general, the most reliable and internationally recognized standard test methods are used [10, 12-22]. Details of the strategic testing scheme are covered in the following section. 

DOE (US Department of Energy) (2007b). America s Strategic Unconventional Fuels. Volume I - Preparation Strategy, Plan and Recommendations. Task Force on Strategic Unconventional Fuels, www.unconventionalfuels.org. 

The committee cautioned that the report offers a strategic framework and blueprint for change, not an immediate roadmap or next steps plan. The third recommendation called for a public process of stakeholder deliberations to explore the full implications of the proposal and address technical design issues. The lOM recommended that the National Vaccine Program Office (NVAC) of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control convene a series of regional and national meetings with the major stakeholders and others to rehne the recommendations and develop plans for implementation. 

This article addresses the above listed problems and related issues, offers recommendations for their rational solution. Namely, it has been defined that the main priorities of transit countries in the South Caucasus region in a foreseeable future are diversification of imported fuel supply, enhanced use of local energy sources, improved self-sufficiency by rehabilitation/renovation of existing electricity and gas supply chains, and the planning of strategic reserves combining water, liquid fuel and gas. 

Further actions are recommended towards technology and strategic energy storage, however, within the framework of technical and economic viability. This means that a system analysis would be needed in order to reflect the entire energy supply situation of the transit country. Options are LNG, UGS, LPG, or other fuels for strategic reserves, both in the (nonproducer) transit country itself and in cooperation with other nations in the region. 

The Act established the Tolerance Reassessment Advisory Committee (TRAC), composed of individuals with a variety of backgrounds and interests to consult and make recommendations to both the EPA and USDA. When this committee went out of existence in 1999, the EPA and USDA established a new advisory committee, the Committee to Advise on Reassessment and Transition (CARAT) to provide strategic advice on issues raised by this Act. 

---