Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Stoichiometric arguments

An actual problem makes the stoichiometric arguments clearer. [Pg.23]

A proper resolution of Che status of Che stoichiometric relations in the theory of steady states of catalyst pellets would be very desirable. Stewart s argument and the other fragmentary results presently available suggest they may always be satisfied for a single reaction when the boundary conditions correspond Co a uniform environment with no mass transfer resistance at the surface, regardless of the number of substances in Che mixture, the shape of the pellet, or the particular flux model used. However, this is no more than informed and perhaps wishful speculation. [Pg.149]

Thus, strong arguments against all of the obvious nitrating species acting alone can be found. However, as has been pointed out, the extent to which ions require solvation by nitric acid molecules in this medium is unknown, and such solvation would influence the apparent order with respect to the stoichiometric nitric acid. The possibility also exists that more than one mechanism of nitration, excluding nitrosation, is operative. [Pg.104]

This argument can be extended to consecutive reactions having a rate-determining step. - P The composition of the transition state of the rds is given by the rate equation. This composition includes reactants prior to the rds, but nothing following the rds. Thus, the rate equation may not correspond to the stoichiometric equation. We will consider several examples. In Scheme IV a fast acid-base equilibrium precedes the slow rds. [Pg.216]

Stoichiometric analysis goes beyond topological arguments and takes the specific physicochemical properties of metabolic networks into account. As noted above, based on the analysis of the nullspace of complex reaction networks, stoichiometric analysis has a long history in the chemical and biochemical sciences [59 62]. At the core of all stoichiometric approaches is the assumption of a stationary and time-invariant state of the metabolite concentrations S°. As already specified in Eq. (6), the steady-state condition... [Pg.153]

As was mentioned in the introduction to this chapter "diffusion-controlled dissolution" may occur because a thin layer either in the liquid film surrounding the mineral or on the surface of the solid phase (that is depleted in certain cations) limits transport as a consequence of this, the dissolution reaction becomes incongruent (i.e., the constituents released are characterized by stoichiometric relations different from those of the mineral. The objective of this section is to illustrate briefly, that even if the dissolution reaction of a mineral is initially incongruent, it is often a surface reaction which will eventually control the overall dissolution rate of this mineral. This has been shown by Chou and Wollast (1984). On the basis of these arguments we may conclude that in natural environments, the steady-state surface-controlled dissolution step is the main process controlling the weathering of most oxides and silicates. [Pg.187]

Photocatalytic decomposition of water on semiconductors is usually conducted under reduced pressure. There are arguments that 02 production is much less than stoichiometric when water photolysis is carried out under atmospheric pressure.20-34,353 Such nonstoichiometric 02 evolution is often ascribed to the photoadsorption of 02 onto semiconductor particles20,34,353 or the formation of peroxides.363 On the other hand, the electrochemical potential of H2 evolution shifts to the positive direction with increasing ambient pressure according to the Nemst equation. Therefore, pressure effect may be negatively significant for water photolysis by Ti02 photocatalysts, since tne flat band potentials of TiO are close to the potential of NHE.23,243... [Pg.299]

On the other hand, and this is the most important consideration here, it has been shown above that no stoichiometrical relations exist between the quantity of fuel and the nitric oxide formed, and that the specific chemical nature of the fuel is of no account but only its heat of combustion it has been shown that the amount of nitric oxide formed is related to the oxygen content in the explosion products and not to the initial or average amount of oxygen during combustion. All this is rather difficult to reconcile with notions of chemical induction, the role of radiation, etc. and is a convincing argument in favor of the idea that the reaction of combustion is needed only to heat the mixture of 02 and N2 in which there then sets in a reversible thermal reaction (caused by the high temperature) ... [Pg.370]

At this date it is probably unnecessary to remind the reader that stoichiometric laws, in the sense of a simple numerical correspondence between the amount of gas combined on a surface, and the amount of underlying material, do not hold, and are not to be expected yet the absence of such relationships has been occasionally urged as an argument against the chemical nature of the combination involved in chemisorption There is probably, as a rule, a quite simple relationship between the number of atoms in the surface, which combine with a given number of adsorbed atoms. [Pg.256]

Defect Complexes. The argument this far has reached the following stage. The state of minimum energy of any system at very low temperatures corresponds, without question, to the attainment of order. Third law considerations imply that a nonstoichiometric phase, with its inherent randomness, should be metastable at 0° K. with respect to a mixture of ideal, stoichiometric compounds. The relative status of complex intermediate phases and of stoichiometrically simple compounds,... [Pg.16]

What actually is sulfur Is that a real question Certainly not if we are content with the answer, trivial today, that it has the simplest stoichiometric composition conceivable—merely a series of atoms of mass number 16. This answer, however, clarifies only the centuries-long arguments about the composition of sulfur—whether this was a combination of one... [Pg.8]


See other pages where Stoichiometric arguments is mentioned: [Pg.16]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.1180]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.1180]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.3431]    [Pg.1027]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.167]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.23 , Pg.77 , Pg.78 ]




SEARCH



Argument

Stoichiometric arguments in equilibria calculations

© 2024 chempedia.info