Stereocontrol metallocene catalysts

Two communications on propene polymerization by non-metallocene catalysts that include DFT/MM calculations have been recently published [60, 61]. They deal with group 4 bidentate non-cyclopentadienyl complexes. In the first communication [60], the topic addressed is the fact that a C2-symmetric precatalyst of titanium leads to a syndiotactic polymer, contrary to observations of metallocene catalysts. The chirality at the metal center is found to play a key role in the stereocontrol of the process. The second communication [61] addresses the fact that a C2-symmetric precatalyst of zirconium very similar to the previous one produces an isotactic polymer, finds out that it is due to a complicated concourse of synergic steric and electronic effects, and emphasizes the key role that serendipity still plays in the design of new catalysts. 

Propagation Reaction Stereocontrol in the Presence of Single-site Metallocene Catalysts... 

The classical heterogeneously catalyzed propene polymerization as discovered hy Natta is a stereospecific reaction forming a polymer with isotactic microstructure. During the development of single-site polymerization catalysts it was found that C2-symmetric chiral metallocene complexes own the same stereospecificity. An analysis of the polymer microstructure hy means of NMR spectroscopy revealed that misinsertions are mostly corrected in the next insertion step, which suggests stereocontrol (Figure 6) hy the coordination site, as opposed to an inversion of stereospecificity hy control from the previous insertion steps (chain-end control). In addition, it was found that Cs-symmetric metallocene catalysts lead to syndio-tactic polymer since the Cosee-Arlmann chain flip mechanism induces an inversion of the stereospecificity at every insertion step. This type of polymer was inaccessible by classical heterogeneous systems. 

One major drawback of rflc-C2-symmetric ansa-metallocene catalysts is that either during the synthesis of the precursors or by subsequent epimerization the meso-form with Cs-symmetry can also be obtained. The active sites of catalytic species formed from meso-Cs-symmetric precursors are obviously nonchiro-topic, and cannot exert any stereocontrol on the chain propagation. As a result, some atactic PP is invariably obtained. ... 

The invention of syndiospecific Cj-symmetric metallocenes has marked the turning point in the understanding of the mechanism of stereocontrol with metallocene catalysts. Again, the presence of isolated insertion errors of the type rrrrmmrrr is consistent with site control (Scheme 27). In the case of the syndiospecific Me2C(Cp)(9-Flu)ZrCl2 catalyst, in which the two sites are enantiotopic, occasional skipped insertions produce a minor amount of insertion errors of the type rrrrmrrrr, which are identical to those produced by chain-end control. In the case of isospecific C2-symmetric metallocenes, skipped insertions would not be observable due to the presence of two homotopic sites. 

In catalyst systems developed for polypropylene like the single site metallocene catalysts, highly isotactic polypropylene structures with configurational defects are obtained by a chain-end mechanism of stereocontrol. For catalytic polymerizations where the tacticity is high, configurational defects can be recognized. 

Section 3 will deal with catalytic systems whose stereospecificity is mainly controlled by the chirality of the environment of the transition metal, independently of the possible chirality of the growing chain (chiral site stereocontrol). In particular, in Section 3.1 the chirality and stereospecificity of homogeneous catalytic systems based on metallocenes of different symmetries and in different experimental conditions will be reviewed. In Section 3.2 the chirality of model catalytic sites, which have been supposed for isospecific first-generation TiCl3-based and high-yield MgC -supported catalysts, is described. In Section 3.3 we will present a comparison between model catalytic sites proposed for heterogeneous and homogeneous stereospecific site-controlled catalysts. 

Nonbonded energy interactions are able to rationalize not only the stereospecificities observed for different metallocene-based catalytic systems (isospecific, syndiospecific, hemi-isospecific, and with oscillating stereocontrol) but also the origin of particular stereodefects and their dependence on monomer concentration as well as stereostructures associated with regioirregular insertions. Nonbonded energy analysis also allowed to rationalize the dependence of regiospecificity on the type of stereospecificity of metallocene-based catalysts. 

For stereospecific polymerization of a-olefms such as propene, a chiral active center is needed, giving rise to diastereotopic transition states when combined with the prochiral monomer and thereby different activation energies for the insertion (see Figure 2). Stereospecificity may arise form the chiral /0-carbon atom at the terminal monomer unit of the growing chain - chain end control - or from a chiral catalyst site - enantiomorphic site control . The microstructure of the polymer produced depends on the mechanism of stereocontrol as well as on the metallocene used [42-44]. 

With the replacement of Cp by a 9-fluorenyl moiety, the metallocene promotes syndiotactic polymerization of propylene under site control. Syndiotactic PP with (rrrr) as high as 0.77 was obtained with Me2Si(9-Flu) (N-t-Bu)ZrCl2/MAO catalyst. ° The stereoselectivity is due to the (pseudo)Cs-symmetry of the catalytic complex, and the stereocontrol mechanism is analog to that for the Cs-symmetric awM-metallocenes. 

For achiral metallocene-based catalysts Czv and achiral Q metallocenes in Chart 2) the chain-end control is present as the only stereocontrol mechanism. It derives from the presence of an asymmetric carbon atom on the last inserted monomer. The chirality R or 5) of this atom is related to the enantiotopic face of the olefin where the insertion took place (Scheme 34). In the NMR spectrum of the polymer we lose this kind of information, as two successive insertions of the re olefin face and two successive insertions of the si face produce the same m diad (see section II.G). As a consequence, we can observe only the relative chirality between consecutive inserted monomer units (5,5 or R,R as m diads and S,R or R,S as r diads) disregarding the absolute configuration of tertiary atoms. We prefer to use the re and si nomenclature indicating the stereochemistry of the methines in the polymer chain (Scheme 35), bearing in mind that the insertion of the re propene enantioface will produce an 5 configuration on the methine. 

---