Statistical thermodynamics Boltzmann energy distribution

We will not prove the Arrhenius relationship here, but it falls out nicely from statistical thermodynamics by considering that all molecules in a reaction must overcome an activation energy before they react and form products. The Boltzmann distribution tells us that the fraction of molecules with the required energy is given by tx (—Ea/RT), which leads to the functional dependence shown in Eq. (3.12). 

Note the qualitative — not merely quantitative — distinction between the thermodynamic (Boltzmann-distribution) probability discussed in Sect. 3.2. as opposed to the purely dynamic (quantum-mechanical) probability Pg discussed in this Sect. 3.3. Even if thermodynamically, exact attainment of 0 K and perfect verification [22] that precisely 0 K has been attained could be achieved for Subsystem B, the pure dynamics of quantum mechanics, specifically the energy-time uncertainty principle, seems to impose the requirement that infinite time must elapse first. [This distinction between thermodynamic probabilities as opposed to purely dynamic (quantum-mechanical) probabilities should not be confused with the distinction between the derivation of the thermodynamic Boltzmann distribution per se in classical as opposed to quantum statistical mechanics. The latter distinction, which we do not consider in this chapter, obtains largely owing to the postulate of random phases being required in quantum but not classical statistical mechanics [42,43].]... 

In statistical thermodynamics, which treats energy as a continuous function, = kT for each mode of the Boltzmann distribution. The radiation... 

Au contraire to the empirical equation of Tait for EOS predictions, theoretical models can be used but generally require an understanding of forces between the molecules. These laws, strictly speaking, need be derived from quantum mechanics. However, Lenard-Jones potential and hard-sphere law can be used. The use of statistical mechanics is an intermediate solution between quantum and continuum mechanics. A canonical partition function can be formulated as a sum of Boltzmann s distribution of energies over all possible states of the system. Necessary assumptions are made during the development of the partition function. The thermodynamic quantities can be obtained by use of differential calculus. For instance, the thermodynamic pressure can be obtained from the partition function Q as follows ... 

Let s use S/k = Si Pilnpi to derive the exponential distribution law, called the Boltzmann distribution law, that is at the center of statistical thermodynamics. The Boltzmann distribution law describes the energy distributions of atoms and molecules. 

In order to get expressions for Gibbs energy G and the Helmholtz energy A, we will need an expression for the entropy, S. The statistical thermodynamic approach for S is somewhat different. Rather than derive a statistical thermodynamic expression for S (which can be done but will not be given here ), we present Ludwig Boltzmanns 1877 seminal contribution relating entropy S and the distribution of particles in an ensemble il ... 

The zeroth moment of a distribution is 1, the first moment is < i>, the second moment is < P>, etc. The higher moments of a distribution hence compute successively higher averages of the distributions of the independent variable for example, in classical statistical thermodynamics the mean square velocity is the second moment of the Maxwell-Boltzmann speed distribution for an ideal gas, and is directly related to average kinetic energy < KE > = m < v >/2, and hence to temperature [= 3k TI2 for a monatomic gas]. 

The Boltzmann distribution is fundamental to statistical mechanics. The Boltzmann distribution is derived by maximising the entropy of the system (in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics) subject to the constraints on the system. Let us consider a system containing N particles (atoms or molecules) such that the energy levels of the... 

In summary, Eq. (86) is a general expression for the number of particles in a given quantum state. If t = 1, this result is appropriate to Fenni-rDirac statistics, or to Bose-Einstein statistics, respectively. However, if i is equated torero, the result corresponds to the Maxwell -Boltzmann distribution. In many cases the last is a good approximation to quantum systems, which is furthermore, a correct description of classical ones - those in which the energy levels fotm a continuum. From these results the partition functions can be calculated, leading to expressions for the various thermodynamic functions for a given system. In many cases these values, as obtained from spectroscopic observations, are more accurate than those obtained by direct thermodynamic measurements. 

Entropy is a measure of the degree of randomness in a system. The change in entropy occurring with a phase transition is defined as the change in the system s enthalpy divided by its temperature. This thermodynamic definition, however, does not correlate entropy with molecular structure. For an interpretation of entropy at the molecular level, a statistical definition is useful. Boltzmann (1896) defined entropy in terms of the number of mechanical states that the atoms (or molecules) in a system can achieve. He combined the thermodynamic expression for a change in entropy with the expression for the distribution of energies in a system (i.e., the Boltzman distribution function). The result for one mole is ... 

Hence, in the light of our both accounts of causality, the molecular dynamics model represents causal processes or chains of events. But is the derivation of a molecule s structure by a molecular dynamics simulation a causal explanation Here the answer is no. The molecular dynamics model alone is not used to explain a causal story elucidating the time evolution of the molecule s conformations. It is used to find the equilibrium conformation situation that comes about a theoretically infinite time interval. The calculation of a molecule s trajectory is only the first step in deriving any observable structural property of this molecule. After a molecular dynamics search we have to screen its trajectory for the energetic minima. We apply the Boltzmann distribution principle to infer the most probable conformation of this molecule.17 It is not a causal principle at work here. This principle is derived from thermodynamics, and hence is statistical. For example, to derive the expression for the Boltzmann distribution, one crucial step is to determine the number of possible realizations there are for each specific distribution of items over a number of energy levels. There is no existing explanation for something like the molecular partition function for a system in thermodynamic equilibrium solely by means of causal processes or causal stories based on considerations on closest possible worlds. 

Nagel, Oppenheim and Putnam saw the explanatory appheation of physical laws to chemistry as the paradigm example of reduction, and it is stiU cited as such. So how accurately does classical reductionism portray the imdoubted explanatory success of physical theory within chemistry Two main examples are cited in the literature (i) the relationship between thermodynamics and statistical mechanics and (ii) the explanation of chemical valence and bonding in terms of quantum mechanics. The former reduction is widely presumed to be unproblematic because of the identification of temperature with mean molecular kinetic energy, but Needham [2009] points out that temperature can be identified with mean energy only in a molecular population at equilibrium (one displaying the Boltzmann distribution), but the Boltzmann distribution depends on temperature, so any reduction of temperature will be circular (for a survey of the issues see [van Brakel, 2000, Chapter 5]. 

It is often claimed, with some justification, that statistical theory explains the basis of the second law and provides a mechanistic interpretation of thermodynamic quantities. For example, the Boltzmann expression for entropy is S = ks In W, where W is the number of ways the total energy is distributed among the molecules. Thus entropy in statistical theory is connected to the availability of microstates for the system. In classical theory, on the other hand, there are no pictures associated with entropy. Hence the molecular interpretation of entropy changes depends on statistical theory. 

---