State space system matrix

State space system matrix A obtained from the block diagram method... 

State space system matrix A obtained from bond graph method and computer generated from CAMPG using (11.14), (11.15), (11.16), and (11.17). 

This tutorial looks at how MATLAB commands are used to convert transfer functions into state-space vector matrix representation, and back again. The discrete-time response of a multivariable system is undertaken. Also the controllability and observability of multivariable systems is considered, together with pole placement design techniques for both controllers and observers. The problems in Chapter 8 are used as design examples. 

In Section IV, we introduced the topological matrix D [see Eq. (38)] and showed that for a sub-Hilbert space this matrix is diagonal with (-1-1) and (—1) terms a feature that was defined as quantization of the non-adiabatic coupling matrix. If the present three-state system forms a sub-Hilbert space the resulting D matrix has to be a diagonal matrix as just mentioned. From Eq. (38) it is noticed that the D matrix is calculated along contours, F, that surround conical intersections. Our task in this section is to calculate the D matrix and we do this, again, for circular contours. 

Figure 19. Relation between and for a bound-state system. The functions in the single space (a) can be mapped onto the double space (b) where they have opposite symmetries under R2n, and belong to different symmetry blocks of the double-space Hamiltonian matrix (c). Unhke reactive wave functions, bound-state functions cannot be unwound from around the Cl.

Equations (41.15) and (41.19) for the extrapolation and update of system states form the so-called state-space model. The solution of the state-space model has been derived by Kalman and is known as the Kalman filter. Assumptions are that the measurement noise v(j) and the system noise w(/) are random and independent, normally distributed, white and uncorrelated. This leads to the general formulation of a Kalman filter given in Table 41.10. Equations (41.15) and (41.19) account for the time dependence of the system. Eq. (41.15) is the system equation which tells us how the system behaves in time (here in j units). Equation (41.16) expresses how the uncertainty in the system state grows as a function of time (here in j units) if no observations would be made. Q(j - 1) is the variance-covariance matrix of the system noise which contains the variance of w. 

The limitation of transfer function representation becomes plain obvious as we tackle more complex problems. For complex systems with multiple inputs and outputs, transfer function matrices can become very clumsy. In the so-called modem control, the method of choice is state space or state variables in time domain—essentially a matrix representation of the model equations. The formulation allows us to make use of theories in linear algebra and differential equations. It is always a mistake to tackle modem control without a firm background in these mathematical topics. For this reason, we will not overreach by doing both the mathematical background and the control together. Without a formal mathematical framework, we will put the explanation in examples as much as possible. The actual state space control has to be delayed until after tackling classical transfer function feedback systems. 

The important message is that there is no unique state space representation, but all model matrixes should have the same eigenvalues. In addition, the number of state variables is the same as the order of the process or system. 

It is clear that the strong form of the QCT is impossible to obtain from either the isolated or open evolution equations for the density matrix or Wigner function. For a generic dynamical system, a localized initial distribution tends to distribute itself over phase space and either continue to evolve in complicated ways (isolated system) or asymptote to an equilibrium state (open system) - whether classically or quantum mechanically. In the case of conditioned evolution, however, the distribution can be localized due to the information gained from the measurement. In order to quantify how this happ ens, let us first apply a cumulant expansion to the (fine-grained) conditioned classical evolution (5), resulting in the equations for the centroids (x = (t), P= (P ,... 

With the dimension of multivariable MFC systems ever increasing, the probability of dealing with a MIMO process that contains an integrator or an unstable unit also increases. For such units FIR models, as used by certain traditional commercial algorithms such as dynamic matrix control (DMC), is not feasible. Integrators or unstable units raise no problems if state-space or DARMAX model MFC formulations are used. As we will discuss later, theory developed for MFC with state-space or DARMAX models encompasses all linear, time-invariant, lumped-parameter systems and consequently has broader applicability. 

Deflnitions. The basic elements of Markov chains associated with Eq.(2-24) are the system, the state space, the initial state vector and the one-step transition probability matrix. Considering refs.[26-30], each of the elements will be defined in the following with special emphasize to chemical reactions occurring in a batch perfectly-mixed reactor or in a single continuous plug-flow reactor. In the latter case, which may simulated by perfectly-mixed reactors in series, all species reside in the reactor the same time. 

Until now, our formulation of statistical thermodynamics has been based on quantum mechanics. This is reflected by the definition of the canonical ensemble partition function Q, which turns out to be linked to matrix elements of the Hamiltonian operator H in Eq. (2.39). However, the systems treated below exist in a region of thermodjniamic state space where the exact quantum mechanical treatment may be abandoned in favor of a classic dc.scription. The transition from quantum to classic statistics was worked out by Kirkwood [22, 23] and Wigner [24] and is rarely discussed in standard texts on statistical physics. For the sake of completeness, self-containment, and as background information for the interested readers we summarize the key considerations in this section. 

It is the early time dynamics, while the system remains highly localized in state space, the specific coupled states are known a priori, and the coupling matrix elements are experimentally measurable or theoretically predictable, for which our study of diatomic molecule spectra and dynamics prepares us. At early time, the system evolves in a reduced dimensionality. The excitation initially is localized spatially on a part of the molecule (a chromophore) and restricted by approximate constants of motion to a tiny fraction of energetically-accessible state space. 

Again, poles and zeros are important for evaluating stability and controllability properties of the physical system. To find the poles of an open-loop MIMO system one can use the transfer function matrix or the state-space description. They are related by ... 

The poles of the transfer function and the eigenvalues of the equivalent system matrix in the state-space form are the same. The knowledge of poles is linked with stability. A multivariable system is stable if all the poles of the transfer function matrix lie in the left-half (LHP) plane otherwise it is unstable. 

We need to learn a little bit of yet another language In previous chapters we have found the perspectives of time (English), Laplace (Russian), and frequency (Chinese) to be useful. Now we must learn some matrix methods and their use in the state-space approach to control systems design. Let s call this state-space methodology the Greek language. 

---