Staffing reviews

TASK d estimate the manpower required and develop a staffing plan. The manpower required to conduct a PrHA depends on many factors, including the review method selected, the training and experience of the review team, the extent and complexity of the process, its instrumentation and controls, and whether the process is a procedure-oriented operation (such as a batch reaction) or a continuous operation (such as petroleum refining). 

Based on the analysis methods selected in Task C, the status of existing PrHAs, and the time requirements for the methods reviewed in Sections 4.1 to 4.6, the manpower requirements for PrHAs, and reviews and updates, can be estimated. Comparing these requirements with available personnel indicates where additional staffing may be needed, either on a temporary or longer-term basis. 

Synchrotrons have the advantage of brighter beams, multiple wavelength availabihty, and a more focused beam, all of which can greatly improve the quality of data and may be essential for the experiments that are to be carried out. The synchrotrons I have worked at are staffed by excellent people however, they do assume a certain level of user competence and are probably not the place to go to learn how to diffract crystals. Synchrotrons will grant time to users in a peer-reviewed process and generally have quite rapid access times (usually booked per 24-h slot). 

The notes, comments, and data in the charts reflected what must have been a supportive and well-staffed research unit. The only negative comments from subjects in the charts had to do with the quality or preparation of the food. Many positive comments reflecting careful attention, support, and, in general, informed participation in the experiments occurred throughout the charts over the years. Retropective chart reviews always involve guessing and speculation. 

FIGURE 7 Trends in FDA workload and staffing resources. (Adapted fromL. X. Yu, Implementation of quality-by-design Question-based review, Drug Information Association (DI A) 42nd Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 2006.)... 

Fifty additional reviewers (for a total of 250) and the appointment of Kathryn C. Zoon, as a new director tor the Cenier for Biologies Evaluation and Research, occurred in 1992, under the leadership of FDA commissioner David Kessler, despite the lack of additional funding for the FDA to carry this out (Ember). By 1996, 500 new scientific staff (from microbiologists to statisticians) had been hired to review applications. The funds for the additional staffing resulted from authorization by Congress for the FDA to collect user fees from the industry. 

The current technological status of small (0.5-5 kWe) PEM, SOFC, AFC and PAFC fuel cell stationary units, was recently reviewed by Staffed et al. (2007) (Table 3.12). The system efficiency refers to electrical losses of the fuel-cell system (fans, pumps, control) and the current conditioning unit (transformer, inverter), while total efficiency refers to both electrical power and heat cogeneration. Cost estimations refer to mass-produced fuel-cell systems according to today s state-of-the-art manufacture technologies and materials, while current retail prices of demonstration fuel-cell systems are in the range of 10,000-100,000 / kWe (Staffed et al., 2007). 

SAIC is in the process of prioritizing the data so that the highest-priority issues will require a response from the site. At present, a site does not have to respond, since there are too many issues in the database relative to staffing levels at the site. Additionally each ECP approved by any site is discussed at a biweekly ECP review teleconference. At a subsequent teleconference the sites inform the PLL team of what action will be taken regarding the ECP. These appear to be among the few issues that are handled in this more structured manner. The ECP review process consists of the following steps ... 

Example B.5 is a procedure focused on assessing the minimum staffing levels for a process unit. This is intended to be a supplement to a more traditional MOC procedure. This procedure focuses on specific emergency procedures and determines the number of people required to get the operation to a safe state in a reasonable period of time. They start with a table-top review of the procedure, then consider all necessary steps and lay out parallel and sequential sets of activities. Consideration is also given to the locations for the various tasks and any potential hindrances which... 

---