Spin spinor function

Our results suggest that the spin correlation functions decay exponentially with a correlation length 1 for an arbitrary parameter a. We also assume that the decay of the correlation function is of the exponential type for the 14 parameter model as well, i.e., for any choice of site spinor I>A/u/p. This assumption is supported in special cases 1) the partition of the system into one-dimensional chains with exactly known exponentially decaying correlation functions 2) the two-dimensional AKLT model, for which the exponential character of the decay of the correlation function has been rigorously proved [32], Further evidence of the stated assumption lies in the numerical results obtained for various values of the parameter in the one-parameter model. 

The spin has no coordinate representation. It constitutes three degrees of freedom of an electron that are independent of the position or momentum degrees of freedom. The corresponding space is spin space. It has dimension 2. The spin representation of the eigenstates may be written either as spin wave functions or as vectors in spin space called spinors. 

The two-component spinor functions cpfi can be chosen as spin orbitals which are the direct product of real scalar functions with spin functions, A (x) a,jS. Such a choice reduces the cost of basis orthogonalization since only real matrices are involved and different spins are decoupled. 

Spin-dependent operators are now introduced. The external potential can be an operator Vext acting on the two-component spinors. The exchange-correlation potential is defined as in Eq. [27], although Exc is now a functional Exc = Exc[pap] of the spin-density matrix. The exchange-correlation potential is then... 

Table I also contains an analysis of the orbital character of these five energy levels. These were determined from the four-component spinors by neglecting the two lower, "small," components, and by assuming that the radial functions depend only upon , i.e. that the radial functions for pi/2 and p3/2> or for da/2 and ds/2> are the same. The orbitals may then be written in "Pauli" form as products of (complex) spherical harmonics and spin functions. Populations are equal to the squares of the absolute magnitudes of the coefficients listed in Table I. [For all but 17e3g, an additional orbital (not shown) is occupied which has the same energy but the opposite spin pattern (i.e. a and 3 are interchanged).]...

The no-pair DCB Hamiltonian (6) is used as a starting point for variational or many-body relativistic calculations [9], The procedure is similar to the nonrelativistic case, with the Hartree-Fock orbitals replaced by the four-component Dirac-Fock-Breit (DFB) functions. The spherical symmetry of atoms leads to the separation of the one-electron equation into radial and spin-angular parts [10], The radial four-spinor has the so-called large component the upper two places and the small component Q, in the lower two. The quantum number k (with k =j+ 1/2) comes from the spin-angular equation, and n is the principal quantum number, which counts the solutions of the radial equation with the same k. Defining... 

For the electro-nuclear model, it is the charge the only homogeneous element between electron and nuclear states. The electronic part corresponds to fermion states, each one represented by a 2-spinor and a space part. Thus, it has always been natural to use the Coulomb Hamiltonian Hc(q,Q) as an entity to work with. The operator includes the electronic kinetic energy (Ke) and all electrostatic interaction operators (Vee + VeN + Vnn)- In fact this is a key operator for describing molecular physics events [1-3]. Let us consider the electronic space problem first exact solutions exist for this problem the wavefunctions are defined as /(q) do not mix up these functions with the previous electro-nuclear wavefunctions. At this level. He and S (total electronic spin operator) commute the spin operator appears in the kinematic operator V and H commute with the total angular momentum J=L+S in the I-ffame L is the total orbital angular momentum, the system is referred to a unique origin. 

The results obtained with the one-center expansion of the molecular spinors in the T1 core in either s p, s p d or s p d f partial waves are collected in Table 4. The first point to notice is the difference between spin-averaged SCF values and RCC-S values the latter include spin-orbit interaction effects. These effects increase X by 9% and decrease M by 21%. The RCC-S function can be written as a single determinant, and results may therefore be compared with DF values, even though the RCC-S function is not variational. The GRECP/RCC-S values of M indeed differ only by 1-3% from the corresponding DF values [89, 127] (see Table 4). 

The standard Schrodinger equation for an electron is solved by complex functions which cannot account for the experimentally observed phenomenon of electron spin. Part of the problem is that the wave equation 8.4 mixes a linear time parameter with a squared space parameter, whereas relativity theory demands that these parameters be of the same degree. In order to linearize both space and time parameters it is necessary to replace their complex coefficients by square matrices. The effect is that the eigenfunction solutions of the wave equation, modified in this way, are no longer complex numbers, but two-dimensinal vectors, known as spinors. This formulation implies that an electron carries intrinsic angular momentum, or spin, of h/2, in line with spectroscopic observation. 

Obviously, the spin eigenfunction sms) is not a function of the spatial coordinates mathematically it is known as a spinor. Different notations are... 

Representation theory of molecular point groups tells us how a rotation or a reflection of a molecule can be represented as an orthogonal transformation in 3D coordinate space. We can therefore easily determine the irreducible representation for the spatial part of the wave function. By contrast, a spin eigenfunction is not a function of the spatial coordinates. If we want to study the transformation properties of the spinors... 

We consider a ladder of N = 2M spins 1/2. The wave function of this system is described by the Nth-rank spinor... 

We partition the system into pairs of spins located on rungs of the ladder. The wave function can then be written as the product of M second-rank spinors... 

We now choose a Hamiltonian H for which the wave function (55) is an exact ground-state wave function. To do so, we consider the part of the system (cell) consisting of two nearest neighbor spin pairs. In the wave function (55) the factor corresponding to the two spin pairs is a second-rank spinor ... 

To completely define the wave function (60), it is necessary to know the form of the site spinor xpup. The specific form of the fourth-rank spinor tyxPlJp [and, hence, the wave function (60)] describing the system of four spins s = 1/2 is governed by 14 quantities [31], which are parameters of the model. 

In general, when the site spinor xpvp is not symmetric with respect to any indices, the possible states of two quartets of spins s = 1/2 consist of 70 multiplets. A wave function represented by a sixth-rank spinor contains only 20 of them. Accordingly, the cell Hamiltonians H12 and 3 can be represented by the sum of projectors onto the 50 missing multiplets ... 

---