Spin-Dependent Reactivity

For the chemical system under study, it is important to deal with unreactive encounters accurately from a spin dynamics point of view. As previously stated, upon encounter of any two radical pairs, the wavefunction is converted to the ST-basis and the singlet probability Ps is calculated. To determine the nature of the encounter a uniformly distributed random number U (0, 1] is generated and compared to the probability of being singlet. If Ps f/(0, 1] then reaction takes place and the spin state of the pair 

For partially diffusion controlled reactions there are two situations possible following an encounter (1) the boundary is unreactive and the particles reflect or (2) the boundary is reactive but the encountering pair is in a repulsive triplet state and consequently unreactive. To handle the above situation, two models have been developed which are described below  

In the above expression, v is the boundary reactivity and D the mutual diffusion coefficient. Hence Prad = I — (a,r,t). The simulation would then proceed as normal using the collapsed form of the wavefunction. 

In method 1, if the radical pair is in a triplet state then all fast re-encounters are most likely be unreactive, since the wavefunction has not had the opportunity to evolve. This is not the case in method 2, where fast re-encounters can result in reaction following an initial unsuccessful encounter. 

---

Theory. Perhaps this is the one area that would provide the most impact. Although modeling of spin-dependent reactive scattering is certainly challenging, we hope that current and future experimental results will provide motivation for theorists to pursue it. 

Here, "recombination" stands for all types of radical pair collapse reactions, such as coupling, disproportionation, back electron transfer etc. This nuclear spin dependent reactivity is a consequence of two basic premises of the radical pair theory ... 

In order to model spin dependent reactivity, where reaction is only possible through the singlet channel, the authors make use of the exponential model of the form P(t) = p(l — to calculate the probability of reaction. Here, the P(t) relaxes exponentially towards the asymptotic value of p (the probability of being in a singlet state), p in this expression is the inverse of the spin relaxation time. Using the shift theorem of Laplace transform, the authors derive an expression for v(s) to be... 

Treating spin dependent reactivity poses a special problem in the current model as there are two possibilities which can arise (i) radical pairs encounter and the surface is unreactive or (ii) the radical pairs encounter but are in an unreactive spin-configuration. The two algorithms designed to treat partially diffusion controlled reactions have already been discussed in Sect. 5.4.4. In brief, method 1 collapses the wavefunction (ijr) upon encounter and reaction occurs with a probability / rad (Fig. 5.17) method 2 calculates the probability of reaction (Ps x Prad) and reduces the singlet component of if by -Prad) if no reaction had occurred (Fig. 5.18). To... 

Forbes further argues that because such a large polarisation can be created on the escaped (R -I- OH), even very fast spin relaxation may not completely quench the polarisation. In this mechanism, the nature of the precursor is irrelevant as well as the hydroxyl spin relaxation time. However the concentration of scavengers and the lifetime of both the symmetrical and non-symmetrical radical pairs will influence the magnitude of the E/A phase as well as spin-dependent reactivity. Whilst this mechanism offers the simplest explanation for the observed polarisation phase, it... 

In this scenario the polarisation produced arises from the Radical Pair Mechanism and spin-dependent reactivity. 

Adam W, Arnold MA, Nau WM, Pischel U, Saha-Moller CR (2001b) Structure-dependent reactivity of oxyfunctionalized acetophenones in the photooxidation of DNA base oxidation and strand breaks through photolytical radical formation (spin trapping, EPR spectroscopy, transient kinetics) versus photosensitization (electron transfer, hydrogen-atom-abstraction). Nucleic Acids... 

This is essentially the method proposed by Cashion and Hersch bach191 and yields results of comparable accuracy to those of Porter and Karplus.207 Several more empirical methods based on the London equation (41) have been proposed and these are discussed in the next section. It has been shown that the Cashion-Herschbach energy expression may be represented as a sum of pair potentials which are spin operators, the correct energy expression being obtained after the doublet spin eigenfunction has been projected out. This spin dependent type of potential has been used to discuss reactive scattering within the framework of the Faddeev formalism.211... 

To account for the spin-state dependent reactivity, theoretical investigations of 1 and 2 have been conducted (25). A covalency analysis of the metal ligand bonds, based on the NBO/NLMO method described by Richards, reveals significant differences between 1 and 2, Table IV (52, 41). Using a relative covalency scale of 0 to 1 in which 0 represents a strictly ionic bond and 1 a fully covalent bond, the high spin complex 1 displays iron-thiolate bonds with covalency values of 0.11 and 0.40, whereas the low-spin complex 2 displays values of 0.75 and 0.86. 

In order to model spin-dependent reactions it is necessary to introduce a spin statistical factor (as) into Smoluchowski s rate constant to account for the fact that only 1/4 of all interactions will be in a reactive singlet state. The modified Smoluchowski steady state rate constant for spin systems is then [3]... 

Complexes with unsaturated ligands (a-vinyl. a-allyl, and alkynyl) have been reported, each prepared from Fe(TPP)CI with the appropriate Grignard (vinyl, 2- methylvinyl.2,2-dimethylvinyl,allyl,or2-methylallyl)orlithiumreagent(LiC= C-n-Pr or LiC CPh) and observed by NMR spectroscopy (Scheme 4). The vinyl and alkynyl complexes are stable in solution at 25 C, whereas the allyl species decompose quickly if allowed to warm to room temperature. All were too reactive to be purihed by chromatography. The vinyl and allyl complexes show characteristic low spin behavior, although the temperature dependence of the vinyl... 

Thus, superoxide itself is obviously too inert to be a direct initiator of lipid peroxidation. However, it may be converted into some reactive species in superoxide-dependent oxidative processes. It has been suggested that superoxide can initiate lipid peroxidation by reducing ferric into ferrous iron, which is able to catalyze the formation of free hydroxyl radicals via the Fenton reaction. The possibility of hydroxyl-initiated lipid peroxidation was considered in earlier studies. For example, Lai and Piette [8] identified hydroxyl radicals in NADPH-dependent microsomal lipid peroxidation by EPR spectroscopy using the spin-trapping agents DMPO and phenyl-tcrt-butylnitrone. They proposed that hydroxyl radicals are generated by the Fenton reaction between ferrous ions and hydrogen peroxide formed by the dismutation of superoxide. Later on, the formation of hydroxyl radicals was shown in the oxidation of NADPH catalyzed by microsomal NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase [9,10]. 

These generalized Fukui functions are local reactivity indexes, as they depend on the coordinates r where they are determined, in other words their values vary from one point to another within the molecule. It is clear that these quantities can be used to know how the charge or (and) spin densities respond when there are charge or (and) spin transfer to the reacting molecule. 

The SP-DFT has been shown to be useful in the better understanding of chemical reactivity, however there is still work to be done. The usefulness of the reactivity indexes in the p-, p representation has not been received much attention but it is worth to explore them in more detail. Along this line, the new experiments where it is able to separate spin-up and spin-down electrons may be an open field in the applications of the theory with this variable set. Another issue to develop in this context is to define response functions of the system associated to first and second derivatives of the energy functional defined by Equation 10.1. But the challenge in this case would be to find the physical meaning of such quantities rather than build the mathematical framework because this is due to the linear dependence on the four-current and external potential. 

Since the two-spin state forms can lead to different products, the products obtained will be a mixture that reflects the initial fractionation of the reaction between the two-spin states. The fractionation in turn is a reflection of the interplay and the probability of cross-over between the two-spin states (8). Thus, the two-state reactivity paradigm resolves the dilemma of whether a radical recombination or a direct insertion mechanism governs cytochrome P450-catalyzed hydroxylation actually they are both involved and the degree to which either is expressed depends upon the specific substrate hydroxylated and the specific enzyme. 

---