Spherical shell-closing

The experimental data are shown In Figure 11a, together with a dotted line, extrapolating the reaction controlled regime to zero time. On the other hand some model calculations have been performed under the assumption that, at the beginning of the experiment, the reaction rate is in the diffusion controlled regime. Then only a restricted spherical shell close to the bead surface Is participating In the substrate conversion. If superimposed on the reaction a time dependent catalyst deactivation occurs, the reactive shell should move to the center of the catalyst particle where active cells are available to substitute for the deactivated cells closer to the surface. 

The spherical shell model can only account for tire major shell closings. For open shell clusters, ellipsoidal distortions occur [47], leading to subshell closings which account for the fine stmctures in figure C1.1.2(a ). The electron shell model is one of tire most successful models emerging from cluster physics. The electron shell effects are observed in many physical properties of tire simple metal clusters, including tlieir ionization potentials, electron affinities, polarizabilities and collective excitations [34]. 

When lamellar phases are sheared, e.g. by flowing through a narrow tube, the membranes are disrupted and the resulting fragments close to form spherical shells, termed vesicles [4]. These vesicles can consist of a single shell... 

Helium One could hardly imagine a simpler elemental substance than helium, which is viewed at the microscopic level as consisting of spherically symmetric closed-shell 2-electron atoms that interact most weakly of all known atoms. It is therefore surprising that helium exhibits thermodynamic phase behavior that is spectacularly unusual and perplexing. 

Before discussing the recent developments of the model, let me remind you of the main components of the DDM (1) The starting point is the spherical shell model of Mayer and Jensen, where the single-particle level energies are taken from the experimental spectra of odd-A nuclei with one particle (or hole) outside a closed shell. There is a single level scheme for all nuclei. Our version can be found in Table I of [KUM77]. 

Fig. 4 Comparison of FEM results (filled circles connected by solid lines) for the deformation of a spherical shell with a ratio thickness to radius as in the experiment by a rigid spherical colloid. Dotted and broken lines are the analytical results from Reissner (Eq. 1) and Pogorelov (Eq. 2). In the FEM, R = 10 xm, It = 50 nm, E = 250 MPa und v = 1 /3 were used which is close to the experimental situation...

Furthermore, for any spherically symmetric closed-shell system, we obtain... 

According to the emulsion particle model, the core is surrounded by a spherical shell of 20.2 A (Shen et al., 1977) consisting of apoBlOO (M 512,937), phospholipid, and cholesterol. The phospholipid and cholesterol were assumed to be present in a 1 1 molar ratio, close to that observed for LDLs (Chapman et al., 1988). The single molecule of apoB was assumed to be located at the surface of the LDL but embedded within the surface shell surrounding the core. This is reasonable, because the volume of phospholipid and cholesterol is sufficient to fill only about 70% of the volume of a 20.2-A surface shell around an LDL of average size. Conveniently, the volume of a single apoB molecule almost exactly fills the remaining 30% of this volume. 

The R r) function is important because it is the most closely related to the physical structure since R r)dr gives the number of atoms in a spherical shell of thickness dr at distance r from another atom. For example, the coordination number, or the number of neighbors, Nc, is given by ... 

Astronomers have used the differing orbital paths of short- and long-term comets to hypothesize a possible source for each kind of comet. The first person to devise such a theory was the Dutch astronomer Jan Hendrick Oort (1900-92). Oort argued that, since long-term comets could appear from any point in the sky, their "home" must reside outside the solar system. Oort calculated that this "home" would consist of a spherical shell of debris located between 50,000 and 100,000 AU from Earth. This shell or cloud (now known as the Oort cloud) would be very stable, and individual pieces (comets) would be torn away only when the solar system passed close to a star, an interstellar cloud, or some other massive body. In such cases, a comet would be propelled out of the Oort cloud either toward the center of the solar system, becoming a comet visible to Earth, or away from the solar system, where it would be lost to interstellar space. 

Each of these tiny bubbles is enclosed in a spherical shell of liquid particles. The shell acts as a surface that, except for its shape, is the same as the surface at the top of the liquid. Particles can escape from the surface (evaporate) into a vapor phase inside the bubble, and when particles in that vapor phase collide with the surface of the bubble, they return to the liquid state (condense). A dynamic equilibrium can form in the bubble between the rate of evaporation and the rate of condensation, just like the liquid-vapor equilibrium above the liquid in the closed container (Figure 14.11). 

The upper limits are provided by the collision frequency of the radical-molecule pair which is about 1011 3 1/mole-sec at 400°K. This result can also be arrived at from transition state theory by assuming that the centers of the colliding pair lie on a spherical shell 3.5 A in radius and 0.10 A thick. This corresponds to a tight transition state since the small amplitude of motion of 0.10 A is characteristic of bond vibration amplitudes in molecules. The only bimolecular reactions whose A-factors come close to this upper limit are the methathesis reactions of I atoms (27) for which the A-factors equal, or slightly exceed, the collision frequency. 

---