Spherical potential, with

She, R.S.C., Evans, G.T. and Bernstein, R.B. (1986) A simple kinetic theory model of reactive collisions. II. Nonrigid spherical potential with angle-dependent reactivity. J. Chem. Phys. 84, 2204-2211. 

X 2 be identically zero, and for X=0 yield an effective spherical potential with the same depth, equilibrium distance and Cg constant as the known pair potential ( ) between the corresponding inert gas... 

The standard procedure (Rose 1961), for heavy atoms, is to solve the wave equation in a spherical potential with relativistic kinematics. In open-shell systems the charge density is spherically symmetrized by averaging over all azimuthal quantum numbers. The wave equations to be solved in practice are, therefore, the coupled first-order differential equations for the radial components of the Dirac equation (Rose 1961)... 

There are many large molecules whose mteractions we have little hope of detemiining in detail. In these cases we turn to models based on simple mathematical representations of the interaction potential with empirically detemiined parameters. Even for smaller molecules where a detailed interaction potential has been obtained by an ab initio calculation or by a numerical inversion of experimental data, it is usefid to fit the calculated points to a functional fomi which then serves as a computationally inexpensive interpolation and extrapolation tool for use in fiirtlier work such as molecular simulation studies or predictive scattering computations. There are a very large number of such models in use, and only a small sample is considered here. The most frequently used simple spherical models are described in section Al.5.5.1 and some of the more common elaborate models are discussed in section A 1.5.5.2. section Al.5.5.3 and section Al.5.5.4. 

The metal cluster will be modeled as an infinitely deep spherical potential well with the represented by an infinitely high spherical barrier. Let us place this barrier in the center of the spherical cluster to simplify the calculations. The simple Schrodinger equation, containing only the interaction of the electrons with the static potential and the kinetic energy term and neglecting any electron-electron interaction, can then be solved analytically, the solutions for the radial wave functions being linear combinations of spherical Bessel and Neumann functions. 

Consider now the solutions of the spherical potential well with a barrier at the center. Figure 14 shows how the energies of the subshells vary as a function of the ratio between the radius of the C o barrier Rc and the outer radius of the metal layer R ui- The subshells are labeled with n and /, where n is the principal quantum number used in nuclear physics denoting the number of extrema in the radial wave function, and / is the angular momentum quantum number. 

Fig. 14. Energy levels calculated for an infinitely deep spherical potential well of radius with an infinitely high central potential barrier with a radius the zigzag line...

These parameters cannot be compared with Eqs. 9 and 10, since pure carbon dioxide cannot be adequately represented by a spherical potential. Figure 18 shows that they give only a moderate... 

Here the unit vector n and radius vector R have opposite directions. The volume V is surrounded by the surface S as well as a spherical surface with infinitely large radius. In deriving this equation we assume that the potential U p) is a harmonic function, and the Green s function is chosen in such a way that allows us to neglect the second integral over the surface when its radius tends to an infinity. The integrand in Equation (1.117) contains both the potential and its derivative on the spherical surface S. In order to carry out our task we have to find a Green s function in the volume V that is equal to zero at each point of the boundary surface ... 

We can see from this equation that the potential / at the point r = 0 has the value that would exist if there were at distance 1/k a point charge -zj or, if we take into account the spherical symmetry of the system, if the entire ionic atmosphere having this charge were concentrated on a spherical surface with radius 1/k around the central ion. Therefore, the parameter = 1/k with the dimensions of length is called the ejfective thickness of the ionic atmosphere or Debye radius (Debye length). This is one of the most important parameters describing the ionic atmosphere under given conditions. 

The dipole-induced dipole interactions are summed over all atoms and expressed as the Hamaker constant (A). The total molecular potential, Um, for two perfectly spherical particles with diameters d and d2 is ... 

The complex of protein, crystallographic water and the counter ions are treated as a fully solvated system. Two key developments were made to treat the system in a more realistic manner during molecular dynamics (i) water molecules were placed as a spherical shell with a radius 34 A from the center of the protein. The outer boundary of the spherical shell was defined by means of an artificial wall with a potential of the type W defined as ... 

Figure 6.17 The difference in the chemical potential of Au(s) between a spherical particle with radius 10 (J.m and a smaller particle with radius r. p = 18.4 g cm and 7s1 = 1.38 J m 2 [21].

It has long been recognized that the validity of the BKW EOS is questionable.12 This is particularly important when designing new materials that may have unusual elemental compositions. Efforts to develop better EOSs have been based largely on the concept of model potentials. With model potentials, molecules interact via idealized spherical pair potentials. Statistical mechanics is then employed to calculate the EOS of the interacting mixture of effective spherical particles. Most often, the exponential-6 (exp-6) potential is used for the pair interactions ... 

R possesses a spherical core of radius a consisting of quark matter with CFL condensate surrounded by a spherical shell of hadronic matter with thickness R — a containing neutron and proton superfluids. The triangular lattice of singly quantized neutron vortices with quantum of circulation irh/jj, forms in response to the rotation. Since the quark vortices carry SttTj/fi quantum of circulation, the three singly quantized neutron vortices connect at the spherical interface with one singly quantized quark vortex so that the baryon chemical potential is continuous across the interface [19]. 

Coarsening occurs because of surface tension, which leads to greater chemical potential and hence less stability for smaller crystals (bubbles). For a spherical crystal with radius r, the interface energy is 4 ir a, and the volume is 47ir /3 for each crystal. The chemical potential contribution from the interface energy can be found as... 

In the s-wave-tip model (Tersoff and Hamann, 1983, 1985), the tip was also modeled as a protruded piece of Sommerfeld metal, with a radius of curvature R, see Fig. 1.25. The solutions of the Schrodinger equation for a spherical potential well of radius R were taken as tip wavefunctions. Among the numerous solutions of this macroscopic quantum-mechanical problem, Tersoff and Hamann assumed that only the s-wave solution was important. Under such assumptions, the tunneling current has an extremely simple form. At low bias, the tunneling current is proportional to the Fermi-level LDOS at the center of curvature of the tip Pq. 

The original 5-wave-tip model described the tip as a macroscopic spherical potential well, for example, with r 9 A. It describes the protruded end of a free-electron-metal tip. Another incarnation of the 5-wave-tip model is the Na-atom-tip model. It assumes that the tip is an alkali metal atom, for example, a Na atom, weakly adsorbed on a metal surface (Lang, 1986 see Section 6.3). Similar to the original 5-wave model, the Na-atom-tip model predicts a very low intrinsic lateral resolution. 

---