Sphere virial coefficient

Table III. Values of the Hard-Sphere Virial Coefficients B obtained from the Exact, the Percus-Yevick (PY), the Convolution-Hyper-netted-Chain (CHNC), and the Bom-Green-Yvon (BGY) Theories ...

J.G. Looser, Z. Zhen, S. Kais, and D.R. Herschbach, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 4525 (1991). D—interpolation for hard-sphere virial coefficients. 

Dimensional interpolation is used to approximate the configuration space integrals required in the computation of higher-order hard sphere virial coefficients. Simple analytic results can he obtained at D =... 

The first seven virial coefficients of hard spheres are positive and no Boyle temperature exists for hard spheres. 

The nth virial coefficient = < is independent of the temperature. It is tempting to assume that the pressure of hard spheres in tln-ee dimensions is given by a similar expression, with d replaced by the excluded volume b, but this is clearly an approximation as shown by our previous discussion of the virial series for hard spheres. This is the excluded volume correction used in van der Waals equation, which is discussed next. Other ID models have been solved exactly in [14, 15 and 16]. ... 

This leads to the third virial coefficient for hard spheres. In general, the nth virial coefficient of pairwise additive potentials is related to the coefficient7) in the expansion of g(r), except for Coulombic systems for which the virial coefficients diverge and special teclmiques are necessary to resiim the series. 

Rhee F H and Hoover W G 1964 Fifth and sixth virial coefficients for hard spheres and hard disks J. Chem. Phys. 40 939... 

The above argument shows that complete overlap of coil domains is improbable for large n and hence gives plausibility to the excluded volume concept as applied to random coils. More importantly, however, it introduces the notion that coil interpenetration must be discussed in terms of probability. For hard spheres the probability of interpenetration is zero, but for random coils the boundaries of the domain are softer and the probability for interpenetration must be analyzed in more detail. One method for doing this will be discussed in the next section. Before turning to this, however, we note that the Flory-Huggins theory can also be used to yield a value for the second virial coefficient. 

One thing that is apparent at the outset is that polymer molecules in solution are very different species from the rigid spheres upon which the Einstein theory is based. On the other hand, we saw in the last chapter that the random coil contributes an excluded volume to the second virial coefficient that is at least... 

The crucial question is at what value of <)> is the attraction high enough to induce phase separation De Hek and Vrij (6) assume that the critical flocculation concentration is equivalent to the phase separation condition defined by the spinodal point. From the pair potential between two hard spheres in a polymer solution they calculate the second virial coefficient B2 for the particles, and derive from the spinodal condition that if B2 = 1/2 (where is the volume fraction of particles in the dispersion) phase separation occurs. For a system in thermodynamic equilibrium, two phases coexist if the chemical potential of the hard spheres is the same in the dispersion and in the floe phase (i.e., the binodal condition). 

The theoretical foundations of these rules are, however, rather weak the first one is supposed to result from a formula derived by London for dispersion forces between unlike molecules, the validity of which is actually restricted to distances much larger than r the second one would only be true for molecules acting as rigid spheres. Many authors tried to check the validity of the combination rules by measuring the second virial coefficients of mixtures. It seems that within the experimental accuracy (unfortunately not very high) both rules are roughly verified.24... 

The next step consists of the determination of the size of the macromolecules in space. Two equivalent sphere radii can be measured directly by means of static and dynamic LS. Another one can be determined from a combination of the molar mass and the second virial coefficient A2. Similarly, an equivalent sphere radius is obtained from a combination of the molar mass with the intrinsic viscosity. This is outlined in the following sections. 

The next step is whether the right side can also be transformed in a scaled form. Two observations encourage such an expectation. The first has long been known and states that all higher virial coefficients for hard spheres can be expressed in terms of the second one [74,75]... 

The Huggins coefficient kn is of order unity for neutral chains and for polyelectrolyte chains at high salt concentrations. In low salt concentrations, the value of kn is expected to be an order of magnitude larger, due to the strong Coulomb repulsion between two polyelectrolyte chains, as seen in the case of colloidal solutions of charged spheres. While it is in principle possible to calculate the leading virial coefficients in Eq. (332) for different salt concentrations, the essential feature of the concentration dependence of t can be approximated by... 

It is illuminating to consider some representative examples of effects of biopolymer geometrical structure on the theoretical expression for the excluded volume term of the second virial coefficient on the molal scale (cm /mol). The simplest case is that of interacting solid spheres (Tan-ford, 1961) ... 

Here ps is the biopolymer immobilization density A2us = 2%D /3 is the second virial coefficient based on excluded volume for a biopolymer of equivalent diameter D (a sphere of equal volume) (Neal and Lenhoff, 1995) and = As/V0 is the chromatographic phase ratio. The surface area As accessible to the biopolymer in the mobile phase is available in the literature, especially for proteins (Tessier et al., 2002 Dumetz et al., 2008). 

Figure 6.5 Temperature dependence of the characteristics of sodium k-carrageenan particles dissolved in an aqueous salt solution (0.1 M NaCl). The cooling rate is 1.5 °C min-1, (a) ( ) Weight-average molar weight, Mw, and (A) second virial coefficient, A2. (b) ( ) Specific optical rotation at 436 nm, and ( ) penetration parameter, y, defined as tlie ratio of the radius of the equivalent hard sphere to the radius of gyration of the dissolved particles (see equation (5.33) in chapter 5). See the text for explanations of different regions I, II, III and IV.

Before considering how the excluded volume affects the second virial coefficient, let us first review what we mean by excluded volume. We alluded to this concept in our model for size-exclusion chromatography in Section 1.6b.2b. The development of Equation (1.27) is based on the idea that the center of a spherical particle cannot approach the walls of a pore any closer than a distance equal to its radius. A zone of this thickness adjacent to the pore walls is a volume from which the particles —described in terms of their centers —are denied entry because of their own spatial extension. The volume of this zone is what we call the excluded volume for such a model. The van der Waals constant b in Equation (28) measures the excluded volume of gas molecules for spherical molecules it equals four times the actual volume of the sphere, as discussed in Section 10.4b, Equation (10.38). 

Among other approaches, a theory for intermolecular interactions in dilute block copolymer solutions was presented by Kimura and Kurata (1981). They considered the association of diblock and triblock copolymers in solvents of varying quality. The second and third virial coefficients were determined using a mean field potential based on the segmental distribution function for a polymer chain in solution. A model for micellization of block copolymers in solution, based on the thermodynamics of associating multicomponent mixtures, was presented by Gao and Eisenberg (1993). The polydispersity of the block copolymer and its influence on micellization was a particular focus of this work. For block copolymers below the cmc, a collapsed spherical conformation was assumed. Interactions of the collapsed spheres were then described by the Hamaker equation, with an interaction energy proportional to the radius of the spheres. 

The possibility of occurrence of instability of colloidal dispersions in the presence of free polymer was first predicted by Asakura and Oosawa (5), who have shown that the exclusion of the free polymer molecules from the interparticle space generates an attractive force between particles, DeHek and Vrij (1) have developed a model in which the particles and the polymer molecules are treated as hard spheres and rederived in a simple and illuminating way the interaction potential proposed by Asakura and Oosawa. Using this potential, they calculated the second virial coefficient for the particles as a function of the free polymer concentration and have shown that... 

---