Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solvation water layer

It has been argued [235] by analogy with the case of molecules adsorbed on glassy n-hexane [232] that this enhancement is due to the electron transfer to CF2CI2 of an electron previously captured in a precursor state of the solvated electron in the water layer, which lies at and just below the vacuum level [300,301] and the subsequent. Similar results have been reported for HCl adsorbed on water ice [236]. It has been proposed that enhanced DEA to CF2CI2 via electron transfer from precursor-solvated states in ice [235] may explain an apparent correlation between cosmic ray activity (which would generate secondary LEE in ice crystals) and atmospheric ozone loss [11]. The same electron transfer mechanism may contribute to the marked enhancement in electron, and x-ray-induced dissociation for halo-uracil molecules is deposited inside water ice matrices [39]. [Pg.250]

The DNA solvation shell consists of about 20-22 water molecules per nucleotide of these, — 15-17 waters associate with the nucleoside and —5 waters associate with the phosphate group [13,14]. Water outside the solvation layer is termed bulk water. Upon freezing, the DNA solvation water forms two primary phases the ice phase, consisting of one or more of the crystalline forms of ice, and a DNA-associated phase, consisting of ordered water which comes in direct contact with the DNA (primary layer) and disordered water in the secondary layer. DNA hydration is expressed in terms of F, the number of water molecules per nucleotide. [Pg.435]

Figure 7.4. Schematic model of the Electrical Double Layer (EDL) at the metal oxide-aqueous solution interface showing elements of the Gouy-Chapman-Stern-Grahame model, including specifically adsorbed cations and non-specifically adsorbed solvated anions. The zero-plane is defined by the location of surface sites, which may be protonated or deprotonated. The inner Helmholtz plane, or [i-planc, is defined by the centers of specifically adsorbed anions and cations. The outer Helmholtz plane, d-plane, or Stern plane corresponds to the beginning of the diffuse layer of counter-ions and co-ions. Cation size has been exaggerated. Estimates of the dielectric constant of water, e, are indicated for the first and second water layers nearest the interface and for bulk water (modified after [6]). Figure 7.4. Schematic model of the Electrical Double Layer (EDL) at the metal oxide-aqueous solution interface showing elements of the Gouy-Chapman-Stern-Grahame model, including specifically adsorbed cations and non-specifically adsorbed solvated anions. The zero-plane is defined by the location of surface sites, which may be protonated or deprotonated. The inner Helmholtz plane, or [i-planc, is defined by the centers of specifically adsorbed anions and cations. The outer Helmholtz plane, d-plane, or Stern plane corresponds to the beginning of the diffuse layer of counter-ions and co-ions. Cation size has been exaggerated. Estimates of the dielectric constant of water, e, are indicated for the first and second water layers nearest the interface and for bulk water (modified after [6]).
The second row is largely reserved for solvated ions. The locus of centers of these solvated ions is called, for historical reasons, the outer Helmholtz plane, hereafter referred to as OHP (Fig. 6.61). On top of the first-row water (the primary water layer) and in between the solvated ions are other water molecules, a sort of secondaty hydration sheath, feebly bound to the electrode. [Pg.155]

Teppen et al. [89] have used a flexible model for clay minerals that allows full movement of the M-O-M bonds in the clay structure, where M represents Si, Al, or other cations in the octahedral sheet. This model was used in MD simulations of interactions of hydrated clay minerals with trichloroethene [90, 91]. The simulations suggest that at least three distinct mechanisms coexist for trichloroethene sorption on clay minerals [90], The most stable interactions of trichloroethene with clay surfaces are by full molecular contact, coplanar with the basal surface. The second type more reversible, less stable is adsorption through single-atom contact between one chlorine atom and the surface. In a third mechanism, trichloroethene interacts with the first water layer and does not interact with clay surface directly. Using MC and MD simulation the structure and dynamics of methane in hydrated Na-smectite were studied [92], Methane particles are solvated by approximately 12-13 water molecules, with six oxygen atoms from the clay surface completing the coordination shell. [Pg.353]

Ion transport across an aqueous/non-aqueous boundary layer is one of the most important and prevalent physical processes that occur in living systems. The mechanistic role that solvating water molecules play in this transport process continues to be poorly understood on a molecular level. The same is true of our understanding of the role... [Pg.52]

There is also a broken-structure region outside the first one to two layers of water molecules around the ion. Here the solvating waters are no longer coordinated, as in the bulk, by other waters, because of the ion s effect, but they are outside the primary hydration shell, which moves with the ion. Such intermediate waters, though partly broken out of the bulk water structure, do not accompany an ion in its diffusional motion. [Pg.85]

Although no hexane molecules were found in the protein s interior for the CTWAT and CTMONO systems, hydrophobic contacts were observed between hexane molecules near the protein surface and hydrophobic side chains in all three systems. Hexane molecules on the protein surface tend to reside in the surface "clefts" formed by the hydrophobic side chains extended into the hexane solvent. At the same time, the hydrophilic residues tended to fold back onto the surface of the protein in order to minimize surface contacts. In our CTMONO simulation, we further observed the water molecules clustered around charged hydrophilic residues, while leaving the hydrophobic residues exposed to the soIvent.(Fig. 1) It has been reported that preferential solvation of the hydrophobic regions of the protein surface by the non-polar solvent is due to the thermodynamically unfavorable formation of a complete monolayer of water in a non-polar solvent. Klibanov and co-workers have also shown that hexane does not strip the water layer - nor does it immobilize the water molecules at the protein/solvent interface. Instead, rearrangements of the water molecules on the protein surface is the more favored process. Our simulations clearly support these experimental observations. [Pg.698]

From Table 2 it appears that on passing from carbon black and aerosil to carbosil the thickness of the solvation shell of benzene increases and the hydration film decreases. The studies of changes of chemical potential of water molecules at the adsorbent/bonded wa-ter/ice interface depending on water layer thickness are presented in another paper [57]. For the initial silica the surface effect is confined to the adsorbent water monolayer. Poor carbonization of aerosil surface causes the increase of water layer thickness to 40-50 molecular diameters. With the increase of carbon constituent part on the complex adsorbent surface, the thickness of interfacial water layer decreases to 15 molecular diameters. [Pg.128]

It must be recalled that the ordering of the water next to the surface is limited to a few water molecules (4-7) per head-group, hardly enough to cover the surface with a continuous layer. Thus, the innermost solvation layer can exhibit lateral inhomogeneity, where ordered water forms patches over the surface of the membrane. Under such conditions, the most efficient trajectory for proton transfer between two sites on the surface will follow through the less ordered water molecules. This pathway may be longer, yet the overall passage time may be shorter. Indeed, direct measurements of proton dissociation in the ultra-thin water layers, only 8-11A thick, that are interspaced between the phospholipids layers in multi-lamellar vesicles, yielded values of 8-9 X 10 cm s [45]. [Pg.1503]

Recently, a molecular dynamics study of the phospholipid DLPE was reported by Damodaran et al. using a united atom model. The model was built from the crystal structure of DLPE reported by Elder et al. The fully hydrated DLPE bilayer has an interlamellar water layer of 5 A. The bilayer was solvated by 553 SPCE waters ( 11 water molecules/lipid) in the head group region. This lipid has a gel-to-liquid-crystalline transition temperature of... [Pg.287]

The above nomenclature can, without any difhculty, be made compatible with the electrochemical terminology. The hygroscopic water corresponds to the IHL the solvation water to the term OHL, and the captive water to the term diffuse layer. In addition, the colloid structure provides for an interface between the OHL and the diffuse layer, called outer Helmholtz plane (OHP), the precondition for any and all electrochemical reactions. The electrical potential between the OHL and the diffuse layer is known as zeta potential, or electrokinetic potential. [Pg.669]

Neutron scattering data for Li- and Na-vermiculite, on the other hand, gave no indication of water protons being immobile on the neutron scattering time scale.This result is consistent with the behavior of water molecules in aqueous solution, since the residence time in the primary solvation shell of a monovalent cation is about 10" s, well within the time scale probed by neutrons. However, as shown in Table 2.4, the self-diffusion coefficients of water molecules on Li- and Na-vermiculite were found to be much smaller than the bulk liquid value at 298 K. These data suggest that, even in the two-layer hydrate, the solvating water molecules exhibit only about 5 per cent of the mobility they have in the bulk liquid phase and about 10 per cent of that in the primary solvation shell of a monovalent cation in aqueous solution (Dg 1.3 x 10" m s" ) . This reduction in water molecule mobility is evidently produced by interactions with the charge distribution on the siloxane surface. [Pg.65]


See other pages where Solvation water layer is mentioned: [Pg.669]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.1785]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.1784]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.214]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.669 ]




SEARCH



Solvation water

Water layers

© 2024 chempedia.info