Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solutions differentiating properties

One of the popular branches of modern mathematics is the theory of difference schemes for the numerical solution of the differential equations of mathematical physics. Difference schemes are also widely used in the general theory of differential equations as an apparatus available for proving existence theorems and investigating the differential properties of solutions. [Pg.781]

The state of aggregation of RLi in various solvents has been investigated by a variety of methods. In 1967, West and Waack used a differential vapor pressure technique to study solution colligative properties of RLi . Deviations from ideality indicated that in THF at 25 °C, MeLi and BuLi are tetrameric, PhLi dimeric and benzyllithium monomeric. MeLi was also suggested to be tetrameric in diethyl ether. [Pg.903]

This is not the only nor the main differentiating property of the nonconforming ion. Having seen that H" is usually to be found tightly attached to HjO, one would expect that H30 would be the transporting entity. It is not HjO" movement contributes only about 10% of the transport of in aqueous solution, and the main mode of transport is, indeed, entirely different from that of other ions. [Pg.566]

Given solutions, or properties of solutions, which differential equations have the prescribed functions as solutions, or have solutions with the prescribed properties ... [Pg.38]

If a Pfaff differential expression DF = Xdx + Tdy+Zdz has the property that every arbitrary neighbourhood of a point P(x, y, z) contains points that are inaccessible along a path corresponding to a solution of the equation DF = 0, then an integrating denominator exists. Physically this means that there are two mutually exclusive possibilities either a) a hierarchy of non-intersecting surfaces (x,y, z) = C, each with a different value of the constant C, represents the solutions DF = 0, in which case a point on one surface is inaccessible... [Pg.334]

It is a property of this family of differential equations that the sum or difference of two solutions is a solution and that a constant (including the constant i = / ) times a solution is also a solution. This accounts for the acceptability of forms like A (t) = Acoscot, where the constant A is an amplitude factor governing the maximum excursion of the mass away from its equilibrium position. The exponential form comes from Euler s equation... [Pg.95]

It is a property of linear, homogeneous differential equations, of which the Schroedinger equation is one. that a solution multiplied by a constant is a solution and a solution added to or subtracted from a solution is also a solution. If the solutions Pi and p2 in Eq. set (6-13) were exact molecular orbitals, id v would also be exact. Orbitals p[ and p2 are not exact molecular orbitals they are exact atomic orbitals therefore. j is not exact for the ethylene molecule. [Pg.177]

In this case the crack is said to have a zeroth opening. The cracks of a zeroth opening prove to possess a remarkable property which is the main result of the present section. Namely, the solution % is infinitely differentiable in a vicinity of T, dT provided that / is infinitely differentiable. This statement is interpreted as a removable singularity property. In what follows this assertion is proved. Let x G T dT and w > (f in O(x ), where O(x ) is a neighbourhood of x. For convenience, the boundary of the domain O(x ) ia assumed to be smooth. [Pg.114]

We note that if the crack opening is zero on F,, i.e. [%] = 0, the value of the objective functional Js u) is zero. We also assume that near F, the punch does not interact with the shell. It turns out that in this case the solution X = (IF, w) of problem (2.188) is infinitely differentiable in a neighbourhood of points of the crack. This property is local, so that a zero opening of the crack near the fixed point guarantees infinite differentiability of the solution in some neighbourhood of this point. Here it is undoubtedly necessary to require appropriate regularity of the curvatures % and the external forces u. The aim of the following discussion is to justify this fact. At this point the external force u is taken to be fixed. [Pg.131]

This summability equation, the counterpart of equation 116, provides for the calculation of solution properties from partial properties. Differentiation of equation 122 yields equation 123 ... [Pg.491]

All other thermodynamic properties for an ideal solution foUow from this equation. In particular, differentiation with respect to temperature and pressure, followed by appHcation of equations for partial properties analogous to equations 62 and 63, leads to equations 191 and 192 ... [Pg.497]

Thermal Properties. The thermal stabiUty of cellulose esters is deterrnined by heating a known amount of ester in a test tube at a specific temperature a specified length of time, after which the sample is dissolved in a given amount of solvent and its intrinsic viscosity and solution color are deterrnined. Solution color is deterrnined spectroscopically and is compared to platinum—cobalt standards. Differential thermal analysis (dta) has also been reported as a method for determining the relative heat stabiUty of cellulose esters (127). [Pg.258]

Alhedai et al also examined the exclusion properties of a reversed phase material The stationary phase chosen was a Cg hydrocarbon bonded to the silica, and the mobile phase chosen was 2-octane. As the solutes, solvent and stationary phase were all dispersive (hydrophobic in character) and both the stationary phase and the mobile phase contained Cg interacting moieties, the solute would experience the same interactions in both phases. Thus, any differential retention would be solely due to exclusion and not due to molecular interactions. This could be confirmed by carrying out the experiments at two different temperatures. If any interactive mechanism was present that caused retention, then different retention volumes would be obtained for the same solute at different temperatures. Solutes ranging from n-hexane to n hexatriacontane were chromatographed at 30°C and 50°C respectively. The results obtained are shown in Figure 8. [Pg.42]

The method of moments reduees the eomputational problem to solution of a set of ordinary differential equations and thus solves for the average properties of the distribution. [Pg.55]

The ability of a GC column to theoretically separate a multitude of components is normally defined by the capacity of the column. Component boiling point will be an initial property that determines relative component retention. Superimposed on this primary consideration is then the phase selectivity, which allows solutes of similar boiling point or volatility to be differentiated. In GC X GC, capacity is now defined in terms of the separation space available (11). As shown below, this space is an area determined by (a) the time of the modulation period (defined further below), which corresponds to an elution property on the second column, and (b) the elution time on the first column. In the normal experiment, the fast elution on the second column is conducted almost instantaneously, so will be essentially carried out under isothermal conditions, although the oven is temperature programmed. Thus, compounds will have an approximately constant peak width in the first dimension, but their widths in the second dimension will depend on how long they take to elute on the second column (isothermal conditions mean that later-eluting peaks on 2D are broader). In addition, peaks will have a variance (distribution) in each dimension depending on... [Pg.81]

Interest in using ionic liquid (IL) media as alternatives to traditional organic solvents in synthesis [1 ], in liquid/liquid separations from aqueous solutions [5-9], and as liquid electrolytes for electrochemical processes, including electrosynthesis, primarily focus on the unique combination of properties exhibited by ILs that differentiate them from molecular solvents. [Pg.68]

In 1926 Erwin Schrodinger (1887-1961), an Austrian physicist, made a major contribution to quantum mechanics. He wrote down a rather complex differential equation to express the wave properties of an electron in an atom. This equation can be solved, at least in principle, to find the amplitude (height) of the electron wave at various points in space. The quantity ip (psi) is known as the wave function. Although we will not use the Schrodinger wave equation in any calculations, you should realize that much of our discussion of electronic structure is based on solutions to that equation for the electron in the hydrogen atom. [Pg.139]

Many papers deal with the crystallization of polymer melts and solutions under the conditions of molecular orientation achieved by the methods described above. Various physical methods have been used in these investigations electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, birefringence, differential scanning calorimetry, etc. As a result, the properties of these systems have been described in detail and definite conclusions concerning their structure have been drawn (e.g.4 13 19,39,52)). [Pg.237]

One easily shows by differentiation with respect to t and using the hermitian property of H that this scalar product is independent of time, if and < ( )> are both solutions of (9-40). The probability... [Pg.495]

Detector Sensitivity or the Minimum Detectable Concentration has been defined as the minimum concentration of an eluted solute that can be differentiated unambiguously from the noise. The ratio of the signal to the noise for a peak that is considered decisively identifiable has been arbitrarily chosen to be two. This ratio originated from electronic theory and has been transposed to LC. Nevertheless, the ratio is realistic and any peak having a signal to noise ratio of less than two is seriously obscured by the noise. Thus, the minimum detectable concentration is that concentration that provides a signal equivalent to twice the noise level. Unfortunately, the concentration that will provide a signal equivalent to twice the noise level will usually depend on the physical properties of the solute used for measurement. Consequently, the detector sensitivity, or minimum detectable concentration, must be quoted in conjunction with the solute that is used for measurement. [Pg.164]


See other pages where Solutions differentiating properties is mentioned: [Pg.260]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.656]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.86]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.517 ]




SEARCH



Solute property

Solution differential

Solution properties

© 2024 chempedia.info