Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transport solution-diffusion model

Fig. 19.3 The solution-diffusion transport model in pervaporation. a Solution of compounds from the feed phase into the membrane surface, b Diffusion across the membrane barrier, c Desorption from the membrane permeate (downstream) side into the permeate phase... Fig. 19.3 The solution-diffusion transport model in pervaporation. a Solution of compounds from the feed phase into the membrane surface, b Diffusion across the membrane barrier, c Desorption from the membrane permeate (downstream) side into the permeate phase...
Figure 2.5 Pressure driven permeation of a one-component solution through a membrane according to the solution-diffusion transport model... Figure 2.5 Pressure driven permeation of a one-component solution through a membrane according to the solution-diffusion transport model...
H. 1965 - Solution-Diffusion transport model described by Lonsdale, et. al (See Chapter 4.1.1)... [Pg.8]

The solution-diffusion transport model was originally described by Lonsdale et. al.3 This model assumes that the membrane is nonpo-rous (without imperfections). The theory is that transport through the membrane occurs as the molecule of interest dissolves in the membrane and then diffuses through the membrane. This holds true for both the solvent and solute in solution. [Pg.42]

Using this simplified model, CP simulations can be performed easily as a function of solution and such operating variables as pressure, temperature, and flow rate, usiag software packages such as Mathcad. Solution of the CP equation (eq. 8) along with the solution—diffusion transport equations (eqs. 5 and 6) allow the prediction of CP, rejection, and permeate flux as a function of the Reynolds number, Ke. To faciUtate these calculations, the foUowiag data and correlations can be used (/) for mass-transfer correlation, the Sherwood number, Sb, is defined as Sh = 0.04 S c , where Sc is the Schmidt... [Pg.148]

The model describes the total flux of the gas target species to be facihtate transported, i, (see Table 7.2) with respect to gas species,J, as the sum of the ordinary solution-diffusion transport through the noncomplexing solvent phase (i) and facihtated transport mediated by the carrier (2). Assuming a partial pressure of the target species, / , to equal zero on the permeate side, one can write the fluxes for each of the transport modes as ... [Pg.330]

Then Uemiya et al. [2] reported another Pd membrane reactor for WGS reaction using Fe-Cr oxide catalysts. The model of flow in the palladium membrane reactor is illustrated in Figure 6.3. They proposed that hydrogen is permeated through palladium membrane via a solution diffusion transport mechanism, and the rate of hydrogen permeation, /, per unit area of membrane, is written in terms of Fick s first law as follows ... [Pg.139]

There are a number of other models of transport of solvent and solute through a reverse osmosis membrane the Kedem-Katchalsky model, the Spiegler-Kedem model, the frictional model, the finely porous model, the preferential sorption-capUlary flow model, etc. Most of these models have heen reviewed and compared in great detail hy Soltanieh and GiU (1981). We will restrict ourselves in this hook to the solution-diffusion and solution-diffusion-imperfection flux expressions for a number of reasons. First, the form of the solution-diffusion equation is most commonly used and is also functionally equivalent to the preferential sorption-capiUary flow model. Secondly, the solution-diffusion-imperfection model is functionally representative of a number of more exact three-transport-coefficient models, even though the transport coefficients in this model are concentration-dependent... [Pg.175]

Solution—Diffusion Model. In the solution—diffusion model, it is assumed that (/) the RO membrane has a homogeneous, nonporous surface layer (2) both the solute and solvent dissolve in this layer and then each diffuses across it (J) solute and solvent diffusion is uncoupled and each is the result of the particular material s chemical potential gradient across the membrane and (4) the gradients are the result of concentration and pressure differences across the membrane (26,30). The driving force for water transport is primarily a result of the net transmembrane pressure difference and can be represented by equation 5 ... [Pg.147]

Ultrafiltration separations range from ca 1 to 100 nm. Above ca 50 nm, the process is often known as microfiltration. Transport through ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes is described by pore-flow models. Below ca 2 nm, interactions between the membrane material and the solute and solvent become significant. That process, called reverse osmosis or hyperfiltration, is best described by solution—diffusion mechanisms. [Pg.293]

Most theoretical studies of osmosis and reverse osmosis have been carried out using macroscopic continuum hydrodynamics [5,8-13]. The models used include those that treat the wall as either nonporous or porous. In the nonporous models the membrane surface is assumed homogeneous and nonporous. Transport occurs by the molecules dissolving in the membrane phase and then diffusing through the membrane. Mass transfer across the membrane in these models is usually described using the solution-diffusion... [Pg.779]

When a polymer film is exposed to a gas or vapour at one side and to vacuum or low pressure at the other, the mechanism generally accepted for the penetrant transport is an activated solution-diffusion model. The gas dissolved in the film surface diffuses through the film by a series of activated steps and evaporates at the lower pressure side. It is clear that both solubility and diffusivity are involved and that the polymer molecular and morphological features will affect the penetrant transport behaviour. Some of the chemical and morphological modification that have been observed for some epoxy-water systems to induce changes of the solubility and diffusivity will be briefly reviewed. [Pg.191]

Solute flux within a pore can be modeled as the sum of hindered convection and hindered diffusion [Deen, AIChE33,1409 (1987)]. Diffusive transport is seen in dialysis and system start-up but is negligible for commercially practical operation. The steady-state solute convective flux in the pore is J, = KJc = where c is the radially... [Pg.53]

For hydrophilic and ionic solutes, diffusion mainly takes place via a pore mechanism in the solvent-filled pores. In a simplistic view, the polymer chains in a highly swollen gel can be viewed as obstacles to solute transport. Applying this obstruction model to the diffusion of small ions in a water-swollen resin, Mackie and Meares [56] considered that the effect of the obstruction is to increase the diffusion path length by a tortuosity factor, 0. The diffusion coefficient in the gel, )3,i2, normalized by the diffusivity in free water, DX1, is related to 0 by... [Pg.475]

On the submicron scale, the current distribution is determined by the diffusive transport of metal ion and additives under the influence of local conditions at the interface. Transport of additives in solution may be non-locally controlled if they are consumed at a mass-transfer limited rate at the deposit surface. The diffusion of additives in solution must then be solved simultaneously with the flux of reactive ion. Diffusive transport of inhibitors forms the basis for leveling [144-147] where a diffusion-limited inhibitor reduces the current density on protrusions. West has treated the theory of filling based on leveling alone [148], In his model, the controlling dimensionless groups are equivalent to and D divided by the trench aspect ratio. They determine the ranges of concentration within which filling can be achieved. [Pg.185]

Dense membranes are used for pervaporation, as for reverse osmosis, and the process can be described by a solution-diffusion model. That is, in an ideal case there is equilibrium at the membrane interfaces and diffusional transport of components through the bulk of the membrane. The activity of a component on the feed side of the membrane is proportional to the composition of that component in the feed solution. [Pg.469]


See other pages where Transport solution-diffusion model is mentioned: [Pg.48]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.2203]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.2187]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.905]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.820]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.405]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 , Pg.41 , Pg.42 , Pg.43 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 , Pg.41 , Pg.42 , Pg.43 ]




SEARCH



Advection-diffusion modeling of solute transport in tissues

Diffusion solutes

Diffusion solutions

Diffusion transporters

Model solutions

Modelling transport

Solutal model

Solute model

Solute transport

Solute transporter

Solution diffusion model

Solution diffusion model transport equation through membrane

Solution-Diffusion Model for Single Gas Transport

Solution-Diffusion Model for the Transport of Binary Gas Mixtures

Solution-diffusion transport

Transport diffusive

Transport model solution-diffusion imperfection

Transport modeling

Transport models

Transport, solution

Vapor transport, solution-diffusion model

© 2024 chempedia.info