Solid system-level modeling

Nano-scale and molecular-scale systems are naturally described by discrete-level models, for example eigenstates of quantum dots, molecular orbitals, or atomic orbitals. But the leads are very large (infinite) and have a continuous energy spectrum. To include the lead effects systematically, it is reasonable to start from the discrete-level representation for the whole system. It can be made by the tight-binding (TB) model, which was proposed to describe quantum systems in which the localized electronic states play an essential role, it is widely used as an alternative to the plane wave description of electrons in solids, and also as a method to calculate the electronic structure of molecules in quantum chemistry. 

To address the short comings of continuum models and yet be able to predict the discharge behavior or capacity fade is an important task. The solution suggested is by developing a novel Monte Carlo method that takes into account design properties, for example, thickness of the cathode, and use it in conjunction with microscopic properties, for example, diffusion in solid phase to predict system level properties of interest. The Monte Carlo algorithm can be considered to follow the framework of continuum models. The next section illustrates the usefulness of the Monte Carlo strategy. 

Using the methods of classical statistical physics one may more or less rigorously solve problems where the system on a microscopic level is either in a state of complete chaos (perfect gas) or total order (solid perfectly crystalline bodies). In contrast, disordered media and processes in which there is neither crystalline order nor complete chaos on the microscopic level have not yet had an adequate description. This problem is connected with the condition that the macroscopic variables must considerably exceed the correlation scales of microscopic variables, a condition which is not met by disordered media. Consequently in order to describe such systems, fractal models and phased averaging on different scale levels (meso-levels) should be effective. 

All the models proposed for fluidized bed membrane reactors have the same limitations. These models are phenomenological models that make use of closure equations originally derived for fluidized bed without internals. Although it is known that the presence of internals (membranes and permeation of gas through them) may vary the behavior of bubbles, mass transfer and solid circulation inside the bed, reliable closure equations for membrane assisted fluidized bed are not yet available. A way to solve this problem is to use a so-called multi-scale modeling of dense gas-solid systems, where low level... 

Direct numerical simulations (DNS) At the most detailed level of description, the gas flow field is modeled at scales smaller than the size of the solid particles. The interaction of the gas phase with the solid phase is incorporated by imposing no-slip boundary conditions at the surface of the solid particles. This model thus allows one to measure the effective momentum exchange between the two phases, which is a key input in aU the higher scale models. Many different types of DNS models exist, such as the lattice Boltzmann model (Ladd, 1994 Ladd and Verberg, 2001) or immersed boundary techniques (Peskin (2002), UMmann (2005)). The goal of these simulations is to construct drag laws for dense gas—solid systems, which are used in the discrete particle type models. 

It is almost impossible to cover the entire range of models in Figure 25.1, and in this chapter we will limit ourselves to the different modeling approaches at the continuum level (micro-macroscopic and system-level simulations). In summary, there are computational models that are developed primarily for the lower-length scales (atomistic and mesoscopic) which do not scale to the system-level. The existing models at the macroscopic or system-level are primarily based on electrical circuit models or simple lD/pseudo-2D models [17-24]. The ID models are limited in their ability to capture spatial variations in permeability or conductivity or to handle the multidimensional structure of recent electrode and solid electrolyte materials. There have been some recent extensions to 2D [29-31], and this is still an active area of development As mentioned in a recent Materials Research Society (MRS) bulletin [6], errors arising from over-simplified macroscopic models are corrected for when the parameters in the model are fitted to real experimental data, and these models have to be improved if they are to be integrated with atomistic... 

The electron-spm echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) phenomenon [37, 38] is of primary interest in pulsed EPR of solids, where anisotropic hyperfme and nuclear quadnipole interactions persist. The effect can be observed as modulations of the echo intensity in two-pulse and three-pulse experiments in which x or J is varied. In liquids the modulations are averaged to zero by rapid molecular tumbling. The physical origin of ESEEM can be understood in tenns of the four-level spin energy diagram for the S = I = model system... 

The section on applications examines the same techniques from the standpoint of the type of chemical system. A number of techniques applicable to biomolecular work are mentioned, but not covered at the level of detail presented throughout the rest of the book. Likewise, we only provide an introduction to the techniques applicable to modeling polymers, liquids, and solids. Again, our aim was to not repeat in unnecessary detail information contained elsewhere in the book, but to only include the basic concepts needed for an understanding of the subjects involved. 

It is apparent therefore that the Superposition Principle is a convenient method of analysing complex stress systems. However, it should not be forgotten that the principle is based on the assumption of linear viscoelasticity which is quite inapplicable at the higher stress levels and the accuracy of the predictions will reflect the accuracy with which the equation for modulus (equation (2.33)) fits the experimental creep data for the material. In Examples (2.13) and (2.14) a simple equation for modulus was selected in order to illustrate the method of solution. More accurate predictions could have been made if the modulus equation for the combined Maxwell/Kelvin model or the Standard Linear Solid had been used. 

Fig. 4 Predicted versus observed summer Anoxic Factor (AF) in (a, b) Foix Reservoir (Spain), (c, d) San Reservoir (Spain), (e, f) Brownlee Reservoir (USA), and (g, h) Pueblo Reservoir (USA). The results have been arranged to place the systems along a gradient of relative human impact (Foix Reservoir at the top, Pueblo Reservoir at the bottom). Predictions are based on linear models using different independent variables (in brackets) Inflow = streamflow entering the reservoir during the period DOCjjiflow = mean summer river DOC concentration measured upstream the reservoir CljjjAow = mean summer river CU concentration measured upstream the reservoir and Chlepi = mean summer chlorophyll-a concentration measured in the epilimnion of the reservoir. The symbol after a variable denotes a nonsignificant effect at the 95% level. Solid lines represent the perfect fit, and were added for reference. Modified from Marce et al. [48]...

---