Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solid supports solvation

SFE usually requires pre-extraction manipulation in the form of cryogenic grinding, except in cases where analytes are sorbed only on the surface or outer particle periphery. The optimum particle diameter is about 10-50 p,m. Diatomaceous earth is used extensively in SFE sample preparation procedures. This solid support helps to disperse the sample evenly, allowing the SCF to solvate the analytes of interest efficiently and without interference from moisture. [Pg.90]

Reversed phase HPLC methods have many supporters who insist that careful application of this technique can deliver log Poct values very reliably (Klein, 1988). When the stationary support is octanol-saturated silica, the process most nearly imitates the completely solvated distribution between phases (Mirrlees, 1976), but great care must be taken to avoid "channeling" in the solid support, especially for hydrophobic solutes where column length is short. [Pg.110]

An important difference between solution-phase and solid-phase chemistry is the new variable the polymer support. The polymer has significant influence on the reaction. There have been many solid supports used over the years with variation in polymer type, degree of cross-linking, and even quality. These factors have significant influence on solvation properties and reaction kinetics, and hence on synthesis characteristics. Various grafted polymers may have characteristics that differ from other supports. Consequently, the optimal conditions for a reaction on one polymer may be different from those for the same reaction on a different polymer. This should not dishearten the chemist. A reported reaction may be used as the basis for optimization studies of the reaction on a different support. Variables such as solvent, temperature, and reaction time may all be investigated to optimize the reaction on the new surface. [Pg.326]

Soluble dendrimers bearing catalytic centers located at the periphery can be covalently attached onto the surface of conventional solid supports (such as polymer beads or silica gels), leading to another type of solid-supported dendrimer catalyst. It is expected that this type of immobihzed catalysts would combine the advantages of both the traditional supported catalysts and the dendrimer catalysts. First, the catalytically active species at the dendrimer surface are more easily solvated, which makes the catalytic sites more available in the reaction solutions (relative to cross-hnked polymers). Second, the insoluble supported dendrimers are easily removed from the reaction mixtures as precipitates or via filtration (relative to soluble dendrimers). These solid-supported peripheraUy functionalized chiral dendrimer catalysts have attracted much attention over the past few years [12, 113], but their number of applications in asymmetric catalysis is very limited. [Pg.174]

Price et al. (Table 8, entry 44) [496] investigated several polystyrene-bound, proli-nol-based chiral auxilaries. The authors performed stereoselective a-allylation with support-bound, hydrolytically more stable propanylamide. The allylated product was then cleaved from the support by enantioselective, linker-induced iodolactoni-zation. The attachment sites of the chiral auxiliary had a profound impact on the stereoselectivity, which was found to be higher than with solution-phase chiral auxiharies. The highest enantioselectivity was achieved with a pseudo C2-symmet-ric auxihary. As solvation effects of polymer-supported substrates are currently still difficult to predict, it is hard to explain why in this case solid-support-bound chiral auxiliaries gave higher enantioselectivities than their solution analogs. [Pg.340]

Recent years has seen a buigeoning interest in solid-phase organic synthesis protocols for the production of combinatorial libraries of new molecules [76,77]. A challenging factor in this approach is the analysis of the newly synthesised materials for which, ideally, direct structural analysis of the material would be carried out whilst still attached to the solid support and thus still available for further chemistry. The direct NMR analysis of such materials, even when solvated, is complicated by two principal factors which can severely degrade spectrum resolution ... [Pg.366]

One key advantage of SPPS, which is often overlooked, is the tremendous solvation of the peptide on the solid support. As discussed before, fully protected peptides are poorly soluble in organic solvents such as dimethylformamide (DMF). However, as the polypeptide grows on a solid support (typically cross-linked polystyrene, although many new resins have been introduced in recent years) the peptide remains soluble and the peptide resin swells as much as 10-fold in volume. As a result, resin bound peptides are effectively in solution at a much higher concentration than the same peptide that is free in solution [20]. [Pg.569]

Beaded cellulose has been tested as a more hydrophilic support [168,169]. Although Merrifield [1] found beaded cellulose unsuitable for solid-phase synthesis, the Perloza beaded cellulose has shown promising results as a solid support. Perloza [168,169] is a beaded, non-cross-linked cellulose support that has adequate mechanical properties for the synthesis of small peptides by either batch or continuous-flow methods. It has good solvation properties in a wide variety of solvents including water, dioxane, DMF, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), DCM, and THE Perloza must be maintained in a solvent swollen state at all times, as upon drying it will not reswell to its original volume. [Pg.63]

The solid support should be well solvated to facilitate reactions to take place involving the two phases. The original supports were based on polystyrene but have generally been superseded by polyamide resins, which have an advantage in that they have a similar polarity to the peptide backbone. More recently, resins based on polyethylene glycol (PEG) grafted onto low... [Pg.96]

As detailed in this overview, the non-covalent attachment of catalysts on a solid support is an important additional technique for the separation and recovery of catalysts from reaction mixtures. Such non-covalent immobilization strategies bring together a number of advantages of solution-phase chemistry and solid-phase supported chemistry. The catalysts can be separated from reaction mixtures by simple filtration. The pre-catalysts can be prepared and characterized in solution. The underlying principle is partitioning between a solid phase or a supported liquid phase and a liquid reaction phase of different solvating power. [Pg.72]

It will also be shown that the absolute electrode potential is not a property of the electrode but is a property of the electrolyte, aqueous or solid, and of the gaseous composition. It expresses the energy of solvation of an electron at the Fermi level of the electrolyte. As such it is a very important property of the electrolyte or mixed conductor. Since several solid electrolytes or mixed conductors based on ZrC>2, CeC>2 or TiC>2 are used as conventional catalyst supports in commercial dispersed catalysts, it follows that the concept of absolute potential is a very important one not only for further enhancing and quantifying our understanding of electrochemical promotion (NEMCA) but also for understanding the effect of metal-support interaction on commercial supported catalysts. [Pg.333]


See other pages where Solid supports solvation is mentioned: [Pg.218]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.1696]    [Pg.1717]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.679]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.869]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.749]    [Pg.873]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.1696]    [Pg.1717]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.82]   


SEARCH



Solid support

Solid-supported

© 2024 chempedia.info