Slater determination of orbitals

To see that Eq. (34) needs at least to be extended, consider a triplet wavefunction of two electrons. The three degenerate triplet components can be written as combinations of Slater determinants of orbitals a(r) and b(r), which for the triplet case can be assumed orthogonal without loss of generality ... 

The relativistic correction for the kinetic energy in the Dirac equation is naturally applicable to the Kohn-Sham equation. This relativistic Kohn-Sham equation is called the Dirac-KohnSham equation (Rajagopal 1978 MacDonald and Vosko 1979). The Dirac-Kohn-Sham equation is founded on the Rajagopal-Callaway theorem, which is the relativistic expansion of the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem on the basis of QED (Rajagopal and Callaway 1973). In this theorem, two theorems are contained The first theorem proves that the four-component external potential, which is the vector-potential-extended external potential, is determined by the four-component current density, which is the current-density-extended electron density. On the other hand, the second theorem establishes the variational principle for every four-component current density. See Sect. 6.5 for vector potential and current density. Consequently, the solution of the Dirac-Kohn-Sham equation is represented by the four-component orbital. This four-component orbital is often called a molecular spinor. However, this name includes no indication of orbital, which is the solution of one-electron SCF equations moreover, the targets of the calculations are not restricted to molecules. Therefore, in this book, this four-component orbital is called an orbital spinor. The Dirac-Kohn-Sham wavefunction is represented by the Slater determinant of orbital spinors (see Sect. 2.3). Following the Roothaan method (see Sect. 2.5), orbital spinors are represented by a linear combination of the four-component basis spinor functions, Xp, ... 

The Cu (001) surface is exposed. This truncation of the bulk lattice, as well as adsorption, leads to drastic changes in electronic correlation. They are not adequately taken into account by density-functional theory (DFT). A method is required that gives almost all the electronic correlation. The ideal choice is the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) approach. In variational quantum Monte Carlo (VMC) correlation is taken into account by using a trial many-electron wave function that is an explicit function of inter-particle distances. Free parameters in the trial wave function are optimised by minimising the energy expectation value in accordanee with the variational principle. The trial wave functions that used in this work are of Slater-Jastrow form, consisting of Slater determinants of orbitals taken from Hartree-Fock or DFT codes, multiplied by a so-called Jastrow factor that includes electron pair and three-body (two-electron and nucleus) terms. 

In practice, each CSF is a Slater determinant of molecular orbitals, which are divided into three types inactive (doubly occupied), virtual (unoccupied), and active (variable occupancy). The active orbitals are used to build up the various CSFs, and so introduce flexibility into the wave function by including configurations that can describe different situations. Approximate electronic-state wave functions are then provided by the eigenfunctions of the electronic Flamiltonian in the CSF basis. This contrasts to standard FIF theory in which only a single determinant is used, without active orbitals. The use of CSFs, gives the MCSCF wave function a structure that can be interpreted using chemical pictures of electronic configurations [229]. An interpretation in terms of valence bond sti uctures has also been developed, which is very useful for description of a chemical process (see the appendix in [230] and references cited therein). 

The approximate molecular wavefunction T is a Slater determinant of the single particle orbitals (j). 

On to the true problem. Assume we have a wave function in the form of a Slater determinant of spin orbitals, To = X1X2 Xn)- We state the problem as ... 

Since H° is the sum of hydrogenlike Hamiltonians, the zeroth-order wave function is the product of hydrogenlike functions, one for each electron. We call any one-electron spatial wave function an orbital. To allow for electron spin, each spatial orbital is multiplied by a spin function (either a or 0) to give a spin-orbital. To introduce the required antisymmetry into the wave function, we take the zeroth-order wave function as a Slater determinant of spin-orbitals. For example, for the Li ground state, the normalized zeroth-order wave function is... 

In the Hartree-Fock method, the molecular (or atomic) electronic wave function is approximated by an antisymmetrized product (Slater determinant) of spin-orbitals each spin-orbital is the product of a spatial orbital and a spin function (a or ft). Solution of the Hartree-Fock equations (given below) yields the orbitals that minimize the variational integral. Thus the Hartree-Fock wave function is the best possible electronic wave function in which each electron is assigned to a spatial orbital. For a closed-subshell state of an -electron molecule, minimization... 

The occupation number vectors are basis vectors in an abstract linear vector space and specify thus only the occupation of the spin orbitals. The occupation number vectors contain no reference to the basis set. The reference to the basis set is built into the operators in the second quantization formalism. Observables are described by expectation values of operators and must be independent of the representation given to the operators and states. The matrix elements of a first quantization operator between two Slater determinants must therefore equal its counterpart of the second quantization formulation. For a given basis set the operators in the Fock space can thus be determined by requiring that the matrix elements between two occupation number vectors of the second quantization operator, must equal the matrix elements between the corresponding two Slater determinants of the corresponding first quantization operators. Operators that are considered in first quantization like the kinetic energy and the coulomb repulsion conserve the number of electrons. In the Fock space these operators must be represented as linear combinations of multipla of the ajaj... 

The MO concept is directly related to an approximate wavefunction consisting of a Slater determinant of occupied one-particle wavefunctions, or molecular orbitals. The Hartree-Fock orbitals are by definition the ones that minimize the expectation value of the Hamiltonian for this Slater determinant. They are usually considered to be the best orbitals, although it should not be forgotten that they are only optimal in the sense of energy minimization. 

If there are 4 electrons in the molecule, then yr, and y/2 are occupied (and yr3and y/4 are virtual oibitals). The occupied orbitals are used to construct the total wavefunction, as a Slater determinant of spin orbitals. 

In the Bom interpretation (Section 4.2.6) the square of a one-electron wavefunction ij/ at any point X is the probability density (with units of volume-1) for the wavefunction at that point, and j/ 2dxdydz is the probability (a pure number) at any moment of finding the electron in an infinitesimal volume dxdydz around the point (the probability of finding the electron at a mathematical point is zero). For a multielectron wavefunction T the relationship between the wavefunction T and the electron density p is more complicated, being the number of electrons in the molecule times the sum over all their spins of the integral of the square of the molecular wavefunction integrated over the coordinates of all but one of the electrons (Section 5.5.4.5, AIM discussion). It can be shown [9] that p(x, y, z) is related to the component one-electron spatial wavefunctions ij/t (the molecular orbitals) of a single-determinant wavefunction T (recall from Section 5.2.3.1 that the Hartree-Fock T can be approximated as a Slater determinant of spin orbitals i/qoc and i// /i) by... 

Since these hypothetical electrons are noninteracting v /,. can be written exactly (for a closed-shell system) as a single Slater determinant of occupied spin molecular orbitals (Section 5.2.3.1). For a real system, the electrons interact and using a single determinant causes errors due to neglect of electron correlation (Section 5.4), the root of most of our troubles in wavefunction methods. Thus for a four-electron system... 

Ab initio Hartree-Fock theory is based on one single approximation, namely, the N-dectron wavefunction, F is restricted to an antisymmetrized product, a Slater determinant, of one-electron wavefunction, so called spin orbitals,... 

Now let us select an ordered tuple of N subscripts referring to spin-orbitals K= ki < k2 <. .. < I n. The (V-tuple of spin-orbitals defines uniquely the Slater determinant of N electrons as a functional determinant... 

It can be proven [31] that all possible Slater determinants of N particles constructed from a complete system of orthonormalized spin-orbitals 4>k form a complete basis in the space of normalized antisymmetric (satisfying the Pauli principle) functions, of N electrons i.e. for any antisymmetric and normalizable (K one can find expansion amplitudes so that ... 

Thus the basis of Slater determinants can be used as a basis in a linear variational method eq. (1.42) when the Hamiltonian dependent or acting on coordinates of N electrons is to be studied. The problem with this theorem is that for most known choices of the basis of spin-orbitals used for constructing the Slater determinants of eq. (1.137) the series in eq. (1.138) is very slow convergent. We shall address this problem later. 

---