Single level response

Single level calibration Linear through zero and response factor... 

A response surface is the graph of a system response plotted against one or more of the system factors [Khuri and Cornell (1987)]. We consider here the simplest case, that of a single response plotted against only one factor. It is assumed that all other controllable factors are held constant, each at a specified level. As will be seen later, it is important that this assumption be true otherwise, the single-factor response surface might appear to change shape or to be excessively noisy. 

When mmor data are used, a POD is obtained from the modeled mmor incidences. Response levels at or below 10% can often be used as the POD. The POD alone, being a single-point estimate of a single dose-response curve, does not convey all the critical information present in the data from which it is derived. To convey a measure of uncertainty, the POD should be presented as a central estimate with upper and lower bounds. The POD for extrapolating the relationship to environmental exposure levels of interest, when the latter are outside the range of observed data. 

Although the suggested level of 7-8 mg of lycopene per day is based on one recent study (Rao and Shen, 2002), a majority of other studies reported in the literature use a single level of intake of 15, 30, or 75 mg of lycopene to study its effect on prostate cancer and other diseases. Systematic dose-response studies have not yet been carried out using disease biomarkers as the end point. Under these conditions, the best estimate of lycopene intake is based on serum/plasma concentrations and biomarkers of oxidation. 

Maltby, L., Clayton, S.A., Yu, H., McLoughlin, N., Wood R.M. and Yin, D. (2000) Using single species toxicity tests, community level responses and toxicity identification evaluations to investigate effluent impacts, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19, 151-157. 

The extrapolation of laboratory single-species responses to the population level is another ecologically relevant extrapolation that is routinely conducted without extensive confirmation of its appropriateness. Actual population studies in the environment and their interpretation through life tables and other approaches are alternatives, but these are resource- and time-intensive and not feasible for all organisms. However, population models also may be useful in this context. Organisms have... 

Fig. 10. Single-photon response of a RCA 8850 photomultiplier demonstrating the principle of two-channel sampled timing. In all three cases, the channel 1 sampled voltage exceeds the lower level discriminator. In the top example, the channel 2 sample is nearly equal and is accepted. In the other two examples, the current pulses arrive 1 ns late and 1 ns early and the large differences between the two sampled voltages causes these photons to be rejected. (After ref. 57.)...

Different levels of approximation in the calculation of tlie response function are plotted in Figs 11 and 12 thick (thin) lines show the results of using a self-consistent (single-particle) response function y (xo)- Solid lines include the Ar in the calculation, whereas dashed lines show the unperturbed FEG results. The free-electron-gas x (thick dashed line) is the Lindhard response function. 

The zero cross level adjustment minimises the timing jitter induced by amplitude jitter of the detector pulses. The zero cross level is therefore often called walk adjust". In early TCSPC systems the walk adjust had an enormous influenee on the shape of the instrument response function (IRF). In newer, more advaneed systems the influence is smaller. The reason is probably that detectors with shorter single electron response are used and the discriminators in the newer CFDs are faster. Therefore, the effective slope of the zero cross transition is steeper, with a correspondingly smaller influence of the zero eross level. Figure 7.63 shows the IRF for an XP2020UR linear-focused PMT and an H5773-20 photosensor module for different zero cross levels. 

In April of 1980, BCSP issued Technical Report No. 1 titled Curricula Development and Examination Study Guidelines. Ralph J. Vernon, Ph.D., CSP, was the author. That Report was issued in response to a perceived need to compile and publish data that would provide insight into the academic preparation and experience required by those who chose to attain certification as a safety professional and would take what was then a single-level BCSP examination. 

The ZC Power-law Model. Although we discuss some single dispersive-response models here, in practice they must always take account of and of possibly some other effects as well and so the overall model is always composite. A frequently used fitting model is the ZARC one of Eq. (22), Section 2.2. It is now more often designated as the ZC and, when written at the complex conductivity level, it may be expressed as o co) = ob[l -i- (t<0T 7zc], where 0 < 7zc < 1. The exponent jic has often been written as n and is the high-frequency-limiting log-log slope of the model. It has usually been found to have a value in the range 0.6 [Pg.267]

In Level 5, the care is matched with need and, in many cases, automated. Customer care becomes a serious effort and will transition into a profit center as it leads to new revenues. Activities work across the value chain, at times with a single contact responsible for the entire network. Customers have full access to a customized experience delivered via individuals or systems. Key customer records and transactions are available to all constituents. 

---