Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Single contact calculations

Signal processing in mechanical impedance analysis (MIA) pulse flaw detectors by means of cross correlation function (CCF) is described. Calculations are carried out for two types of signals, used in operation with single contact and twin contact probes. It is shown that thi.s processing can increase the sensitivity and signal to noise ratio. [Pg.827]

Figure 3.22. The schematic representation of (a) the exponential model (EM) and (b) contact approximation. In EM the reaction sphere of radius a is transparent for particles, which leave it by a single jump with the rate ksep. In contact calculations, the same sphere surrounds an excluded volume and recombination takes place only at its surface, or more precisely in a narrow spherical layer around it. Figure 3.22. The schematic representation of (a) the exponential model (EM) and (b) contact approximation. In EM the reaction sphere of radius a is transparent for particles, which leave it by a single jump with the rate ksep. In contact calculations, the same sphere surrounds an excluded volume and recombination takes place only at its surface, or more precisely in a narrow spherical layer around it.
The single-chain structure factors calculated in the previous sections correspond to the infinite dilution limit. This limit also corresponds to zero scattering intensity and is not useful so that concentration effects have to be included in the modeling of polymer solutions. First, Zimm s single-contact approximation [5] is reviewed for dilute polymer solutions then, a slight extension of that formula which applies to semidilute solutions, is discussed. [Pg.103]

Fig. 21.1. Heat transfer flowsheet for single contact, sulfur burning sulfuric acid plant. It is simpler than industrial plants, which nearly always have 4 catalyst beds rather than 3. The gaseous product is cool, S03 rich gas, ready for H2S04 making. The heat transfer product is superheated steam. All calculations in this chapter are based on this figure s feed gas composition and catalyst bed input gas temperatures. All bed pressures are 1.2 bar. The catalyst bed output gas temperatures are the intercept temperatures calculated in Sections 12.2, 15.2 and 16.3. Fig. 21.1. Heat transfer flowsheet for single contact, sulfur burning sulfuric acid plant. It is simpler than industrial plants, which nearly always have 4 catalyst beds rather than 3. The gaseous product is cool, S03 rich gas, ready for H2S04 making. The heat transfer product is superheated steam. All calculations in this chapter are based on this figure s feed gas composition and catalyst bed input gas temperatures. All bed pressures are 1.2 bar. The catalyst bed output gas temperatures are the intercept temperatures calculated in Sections 12.2, 15.2 and 16.3.
Fig. 23.1. Simplified single contact sulfuric acid production flowsheet. Its inputs are moist feed gas and water. Its outputs are 98 mass% H2S04, 2 mass% H20 sulfuric acid and dilute S02, 02, N2 gas. The acid output combines gas dehydration tower acid, H2S04 making tower acid and liquid water. The equivalent sulfur burning acid plant sends moist air (rather than moist feed gas) to dehydration. Appendix V gives an example sulfur burning calculation. Fig. 23.1. Simplified single contact sulfuric acid production flowsheet. Its inputs are moist feed gas and water. Its outputs are 98 mass% H2S04, 2 mass% H20 sulfuric acid and dilute S02, 02, N2 gas. The acid output combines gas dehydration tower acid, H2S04 making tower acid and liquid water. The equivalent sulfur burning acid plant sends moist air (rather than moist feed gas) to dehydration. Appendix V gives an example sulfur burning calculation.
Fig. 24.1. Fig. 23.1 s single contact H2S04 making tower. Its temperatures and gas compositions are used in Section 24.1 and 24.2 s calculations. The calculations assume that all input S02(g) reacts to form H2S04(f). Note that output gas temperature = input acid temperature. ( Hay et al., 2003). [Pg.272]

Behavior of gels was first calculated from the elastic properties of a single contact between two spheres in 1985 and presented in a lecture which was published a year later.The contact stiffness arises because the spheres move together as a eompression load F is applied to the two spheres. Under zero load the distance between the sphere centres is D, as shown in Fig. 11.6(a), but when a force F is applied (Fig. 11.6(b)) the spheres move together an extra distance 5 which depends on the adhesion between the spheres. The stiffness is defined as... [Pg.251]

Janecke Diagram. Construction on these coordinates is indicated in Fig. 6.21, which also includes the solvent-recovery lines. Calculations again are simply an extension of the case for single contact, Eqs. (6.30) to... [Pg.148]

Solvent Recovery. Since but a single raflSnate and a single extract are the products of this type of operation, solvent-recovery calculations are identical with those of the single-contact operation described previously. The maximum purity of C in the finished extract will accordingly result if the solvent-removal line EiSe is tangent to the binodal curve. [Pg.158]

Equations (6.121) and (6.111) used alternately will permit calculation of the weights of the various extracts and raffinates. Solvent recovery is identical with that for single contact, and if pure B is the solvent, Xo = Xfl , and lines SF and SRn are vertical since S is at infinity. [Pg.162]

Single-contact Extraction. These calculations were first described by Hunter (10). Refer to Fig. 7.1. On tetrahedral diagrams of this sort, the geometrical rules applicable to mixtures on ternary triangular diagrams apply. Consequently, if feed solution F, a solution of components A and By is extracted with solvent S, a solution of C and D, the point M representing the mixture as a whole is on the straight line FS, such that... [Pg.204]

Illustration 1. One hundred pounds of a 20% acetone (A), 80% chloroform (J5), solution are to be extracted in a single-contact process with 100 lb. of a mixed solvent consisting of 65% water (C), 35% acetic acid (Z>), at 25 C. Calculate the weights and compositions of extract and raffinate. [Pg.211]

Calculate the compositions of solvent-free products for a single-contact doublesolvent extraction of 100 lb. of a solution containing 69.9% acetone (B), 30.1% acetic acid (C), with the double-solvent 106.3 lb. chloroform (A)-117.7 lb. water (D). Compare the results with the experimental data of Brancker, Hunter, and Nash, who show the results to be 42.25% B, 57.75% C 90.55% B, 9.45% C. [Pg.405]

In this theory the single-contact term, the double-contact term, and so forth are taken into consideration. The cluster diagrams developed by Ursell (1927) and Mayer et al. (1940, 1945) are employed to calculate the mean-square end-to-end distance. Here we give the results obtained by Yamakawa (1971) ... [Pg.108]

In addition to an estimate for P(q,cX interpretation data on S(q,c) requires an evaluation of H(q, c). Experience su ests that H(q, c) 1 for dflute solutions (e.g., solutions with [t]]c <0.1), in which case the single-contact approximation applks, and data on S(q, c) vs u = (qRc) at different c form a series of paraltel curves [1-6, 12, 19]. However, data are now available showing that in moderately concentrated solutions, H(q, c) deviates tignificantly from unity under both Flory Theta condhions [18] ai in good solvents [46,48, 49]. The experimental evaluation of H(q,c) is ampler under Flory Theta conditions as Rg may be considered to be independent coiK tration in that case. The behavior for H(q, c) under Flory Theta ctmditions calculated from... [Pg.249]

In concluding this paper, we remark that if we limit our calculations to a single contact approximation and pretend as though the result to be useable to all N, then we have the following "self-consistent values for a , the expansion parameter. [Pg.474]

Traditionally the central film thickness prediction is the main goal of numerical calculations. However, this work focuses on the oil film loss from inlet to outlet. Consequently, the ratio of the inlet oil layer thickness HoU, the central film thickness He and the outlet oil layer Hout was studied, see figure 3. In this figure one observes a reduction of the oil layer thickness going from inlet to outlet. The difference between HoU and Hout represents the oil removed from the track by a single contact pass. By varying the inlet oil layer HoU, the evolution of the contact starvation as a function of multiple passes can be modelled. [Pg.687]

The Champ-Sons model is a most effieient tool allowing quantitative predictions of the field radiated by arbitrary transducers and possibly complex interfaces. It allows one to easily define the complete set of transducer characteristics (shape of the piezoelectric element, planar or focused lens, contact or immersion, single or multi-element), the excitation pulse (possibly an experimentally measured signal), to define the characteristics of the testing configuration (geometry of the piece, transducer position relatively to the piece, characteristics of both the coupling medium and the piece), and finally to define the calculation to run (field-points position, acoustical quantity considered). [Pg.737]

The contact angle for water on single-crystal naphthalene is 87.7° at 35°C, and ddjdT is -0.13 deg/K. Using data from Table III-l as necessary, calculate the heat of immersion of naphthalene in water in cal/g if a sample of powdered naphthalene of 10 m /g is used for the immersion study. (Note Ref. 135.)... [Pg.592]

Interfacial Contact Area and Approach to Equilibrium. Experimental extraction cells such as the original Lewis stirred cell (52) are often operated with a flat Hquid—Hquid interface the area of which can easily be measured. In the single-drop apparatus, a regular sequence of drops of known diameter is released through the continuous phase (42). These units are useful for the direct calculation of the mass flux N and hence the mass-transfer coefficient for a given system. [Pg.64]

In the early 1970s, air pollution requirements led to the adoption of the double contact or double absorption process, which provides overall conversions of better than 99.7%. The double absorption process employs the principle of intermediate removal of the reaction product, ie, SO, to obtain favorable equiUbria and kinetics in later stages of the reaction. A few single absorption plants are stiU being built in some areas of the world, or where special circumstances exist, but most industriali2ed nations have emission standards that cannot be achieved without utili2ing double absorption or tad-gas scmbbers. A discussion of sulfuric acid plant air emissions, control measures, and emissions calculations can be found in Reference 98. [Pg.183]


See other pages where Single contact calculations is mentioned: [Pg.124]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.2840]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.100]   


SEARCH



Calculations (contact

Single contact calculations dilution water requirement

Single contact calculations flowsheet

Single contact calculations matrix for

Single contact calculations vs. %H2O in product acid

Single contact calculations vs. H2O in input gas

Single contact calculations vs. input SO3

© 2024 chempedia.info