Silicones hydrophilic domains

Simple Strategies to Manipulate Hydrophilic Domains in Silicones... 

The high hydrophobicity of silicones can complicate their use in some applications. For example, proteins can undergo denaturation in contact with silicones [1]. In such cases, the siloxane can be modified to include a hydrophilic domain. This is typically accomplished by functionalizing the silicone with a hydrophilic polymer such as poly(ethylene oxide)(PEO). Silicone surfactants of this type have found widespread use as stabilizers for polyurethane foams, and have been investigated as a structurant to prepare siloxane elastomers for biomaterials... 

Interfacial behavior of different silicones was extensively studied, as indicated in Section 3.12.4.6. To add a few more examples, solution behavior of water-soluble polysiloxanes carrying different pendant hydrophilic groups, thus differing in hydrophobicity, was reported.584 A study of the aggregation phenomena of POSS in the presence of amphiphilic PDMS at the air/water interface was conducted in an attempt to elucidate nanofiller-aggregation mechanisms.585 An interesting phenomenon of the spontaneous formation of stable microtopographical surface domains, composed primarily of PDMS surrounded by polyurethane matrix, was observed in the synthesis of a cross-linked PDMS-polyurethane films.586... 

In contrast, organophilic PV membranes are used for removal of (volatile) organic compounds from aqueous solutions. They are typically made of rubbery polymers (elastomers). Cross-linked silicone rubber (PDMS) is the state-of-the-art for the selective barrier [1, 43, 44]. Nevertheless, glassy polymers (e.g., substituted polyacetylene or poly(l-(trimethylsilyl)-l-propyne, PTMSP) were also observed to be preferentially permeable for organics from water. Polyether-polyamide block-copolymers, combining permeable hydrophilic and stabilizing hydrophobic domains within one material, are also successfully used as a selective barrier. 

When the blend is imaged with the non-modified tip, the elevated PMMA islands appear brighter than the PS domains (Fig. 2A). This indicates stronger interaction between a hydrophilic silicon oxide tip and PMMA. After silylation, the adhesive force contrast is reversed (Fig. 2B,C). This indicates that the interactions between a hydrophobic tip and PS are stronger than the adhesive interaction with PS. Comparison of the maximum adhesive forces obtained for an HMDS-modified tip (Fig. 2B) with those obtained for a PDMS-treated tip (Fig. 2C) reveals higher forces for the latter. Since both tips are hydrophobic, the difference cannot be explained by a variation in surface energy. More likely it is caused by differences in the mechanical properties of the silylated tips HMDS monolayers are harder than PDMS polymeric layers. The softer tip is tackier than the harder one. 

An elegant example that illustrates the enormous potential of this area is that provided by the use of the hydrophilic polyether domains of phase-separated polyis-oprene-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (PI-b-PEO) as a reaction medium for the sol-gel hydrolysis of silicon and aluminum alkoxides [62]. The resulting structures can, for example, be subsequently dispersed in a solvent and consist of crosslinked silica/alumi-na/PEO nano-objects solubilized by the polyisoprene chains (Fig. 1.8). 

Dvornic, P. R. Leuze-Jallouli, A. M. D. Owen, M. J. Perz, S. V., Radially Layered Poly(Amidoamine-organosilicon) Copolymeric Dedrimers and Their Networks Containing Controlled Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Nanoscopic Domains. In Silicones and Silicone-Modified Materials, Clarson, S. J. Fitzgerald, J. J. Owen, M. J. Smith, S. D., Eds. American Chemical Society Washington, DC, 2000 Vol. 729, pp 241-269. 

---