Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Silicon cleaning surface

Chemical reactions of aimnonia with the silicon surface have also been clearly observed using STS [21], where the disappearance of the it and it states characteristic of the clean surface coincides with the fomiation of Si-H antibonding states corresponding to the dissociation of the ammonia on the Si surface. [Pg.1681]

Property measurements of fullerenes are made either on powder samples, films or single crystals. Microcrystalline C6o powder containing small amounts of residual solvent is obtained by vacuum evaporation of the solvent from the solution used in the extraction and separation steps. Pristine Cgo films used for property measurements are typically deposited onto a variety of substrates (< . , a clean silicon (100) surface to achieve lattice matching between the crystalline C60 and the substrate) by sublimation of the Cr,o powder in an inert atmosphere (e.g., Ar) or in vacuum. Single crystals can be grown either from solution using solvents such as CS and toluene, or by vacuum sublimation [16, 17, 18], The sublimation method yields solvent-free crystals, and is the method of choice. [Pg.58]

Surface Treatments 13. Use zinc coating primer (Ensure clean surface for metal joining) 14. Spray on a silicone coating 21. Treat the surface with alkali (Alkali may affect the product s performance) 34. Try a polymer with a protective layer and heat to use (Troublesome as heating of the polymer is required) 56. Blow dry the surface (Not user friendly and time consuming)... [Pg.427]

Table 1. Reflection of He at normal incidence from clean surfaces of Tungsten, Molybdenum, and Silicon. is the energy of the incident ion and R is the probability that it will be reflected from the surface as an ion. (From Ref. )... Table 1. Reflection of He at normal incidence from clean surfaces of Tungsten, Molybdenum, and Silicon. is the energy of the incident ion and R is the probability that it will be reflected from the surface as an ion. (From Ref. )...
Schlier, R. E. and Farnsworth, H. E. Structure and adsorption characteristics of clean surfaces of germanium and silicon. Journal of Chemical Physics 30, 917 (1959). [Pg.380]

Fig. 1. Models of the silicon(lOO) surface, (a) The clean reconstructed Si(100)-(2 X 1) surface lined with rows of symmetric dimers, (b) The tilted-dimer model of the surface. Note that the actual periodicity is c(4 X 2). (c) The monohydride-passivated Si(001)-(2 X 1)-H surface, Dimers are symmetrized upon hydrogen adsorption. Fig. 1. Models of the silicon(lOO) surface, (a) The clean reconstructed Si(100)-(2 X 1) surface lined with rows of symmetric dimers, (b) The tilted-dimer model of the surface. Note that the actual periodicity is c(4 X 2). (c) The monohydride-passivated Si(001)-(2 X 1)-H surface, Dimers are symmetrized upon hydrogen adsorption.
METHODS OF OBTAINING atomically-clean surfaces of solids are listed with comments on their advantages and limitations. The method of argon-ion bombardment is reviewed with a discussion of the operating conditions and precautions necessary for successful results. The low-energy electron-diffraction method is used to determine the condition of the surface. Experimental results indicate that the relative positions of the atoms in the clean (100) surface planes of germanium and silicon are not the same as those of similar planes in the bulk crystals. [Pg.21]

Knowledge of the adsorption of hydrogen on silicon and germanium surfaces is important in order to obtain information on interfacial phenomenon of semiconductors. The adsorption of hydrogen on Si (111) surfaces is one of the best understood systems, although the exact nature of the clean surfaces is not well understood. [Pg.1619]

Fig. 1 presents the EELS data for silicon growth (Vsi=0.17 nm/min at substrate temperature 150°C) atop 2D Mg2Si with structure (2/3)V3-R30°. It is apparent, that surface phase does not destroy at Si overgrowth and 2 nm of Si completely cover the silicide phase. However, the surface plasmon shifted to lower energy at 20 nm of Si thickness, while position of bulk plasmon corresponded to the monocrystalline silicon. The main cause of the given difference is the strong surface relief Therefore in this case the known relation between bulk and surface plasmons for atomically clean surface is not valid. [Pg.93]


See other pages where Silicon cleaning surface is mentioned: [Pg.691]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.688]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.872]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.92]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.182 , Pg.184 , Pg.185 ]




SEARCH



Silicon surface

Surface cleaning

© 2024 chempedia.info