Shore method

With the Shore methods the penetrating body is a cone with A and C the tip of the cone is flattened to a circle with 0.79 mm diameter with D it is rounded-off to a radius of curvature of 0.1 mm. The force is exerted by a spring, which for A, mainly applied to rubbers, is considerably less stiff than for C and D. Hard thermoplastics are mostly characterized by Shore D the values found are between 50 and 90 units. 

The hardness of composites was measured by Shore method, using the Shore A scale according to PN - EN ISO 868 2004. The vnlcanizates morphology was assessed by ZEISS emission gun scaiming electron microscope (SEM). Small pieces of the uncured rubber were placed in liquid nitrogen for 5 min. They were recovered and fractured into two pieces to create fresh surfaces. The samples, 25 mm in area and 6 mm thick, were coated with gold, and then examined and photographed in the SEM. 

Hardness - quoted for fully cured adhesives or polymers often using the Shore method (Hs). Two scales are commonly used for adhesives. Shore A for relatively soft (rubbery) materials, Shore D for relatively hard materials. The higher the number, the harder the material. Values are normally quoted at RT, although hardness at other temperatures may be stated. 

Fig. 1. Relative efficiency of plasticizers where H represents Cg phthalate +, C q phthalate A, phthalate and , phthalate phr = parts per hundred mbber. Values for the trimeUitates fall in the shaded area. BSS 35 is equivalent to a Shore A hardness of 80, test method BS2782.

The numerical approaches to the solution of the Laplace equation usually demand access to minicomputers with fast processing capabilities. Numerical methods of this sort are essential when the electrolyte is unconfined, as for an off-shore rig or a submarine hull. However, where the electrolyte is confined, as within essentially cylindrical equipment such as pipework and heat-exchangers, or for restricted electrolyte depths, a simpler modelling procedure may be adopted in the case of electrolytes of good conductivity, such as sea-water . This simpler procedure enables computation to be carried out on small, desk-top microcomputers. 

Unless test coupons are produced alongside the lining, the only method of testing the vulcanisation state is with a hand hardness meter. A Shore A or IRHD meter is used for soft rubber linings and a Shore D meter for ebonites. The usual specification is that the hardness has to conform to 5° of the specified hardness. There is no quantitative non-destructive test for the strength of the bond between the lining and the substrate and so such tests are usually carried out in the laboratory on a sample prepared from the materials used. 

Physical properties (ASIM methods in parentheses) Gel time = 2-5 min hardness (D2240) = 49 Shore D (>90 Shore A) tensile strength (D412) = 2393 pounds per square inch (psi) ultimate elongation (D412) = 103% die C tear (D624 — 91) = 341 foot-pounds per inch (Ibf/in.) split tear (D3489 — 90) = 97 lbf/in. I g(DMA) = -50°C. 

If we were to choose the ideal method for the analysis of any component of seawater, it would naturally be an in situ method. Where such a method is possible, the problems of sampling and sample handling are eliminated and in many cases we can obtain continuous profiles rather than limited number of discrete samples. In the absence of an in situ method, the next most acceptable alternative is analysis on board ship. A real-time analysis not only permits us to choose our next sampling station on the basis of the results of the last station, it also avoids the problem of the storage of samples until the return to a shore laboratory. 

Figure 2.3. The distribution of sample concentrations encountered in the comparisons of the colorimetric method without iodine with (a) the polarographic method and (b) the colorimetric method with iodine water. For convenience the line of the unit gradient is shown in both cases. In each case the precision (95% confidence level) for each measurement is shown for the most concentrated sample. In (b) the broken line divides on shore (A) and offshore ( ) samples. From [80]...

An estimate of the accuracy of both analytical methods was performed on bis(tri-n-butyltin) oxide and tri-n-butyltin chloride solutions (8.9-35.6 ig/l) prepared in filtered (0.45 im) near-shore seawater free of detectable organ-otins. Average mean recoveries of 92.8% by both methods were determined for tributyltin standard solutions. Low ng/1 levels of mono-, di-, and tributyltin were found in samples taken from San Diego Bay. 

Mass spectrometers have been used at some level in all of these types of investigations because of their unsurpassed sensitivity and specificity, their multicomponent analytical capability and, in some cases, their ability to provide precise and accurate isotope ratios. Traditional methods of analysis typically involve the collection of water and sediment samples, or biological specimens, during field expeditions and cmises on research vessels (R/Vs), and subsequent delivery of samples to a shore-based laboratory for mass spectrometric analyses. The recent development of field-portable mass spectrometers, however, has greatly facilitated prompt shipboard analyses. Further adaptation of portable mass spectrometer technology has also led to construction of submersible instruments that can be deployed at depth for in situ measurements. 

Hardness is essentially a measure of stiffness and in principle can be related to modulus. For plastics, the term hardness refers to resistance to indentation but depending on the test method the measurement is made either with the indentation load applied or after its removal when elastic recovery has taken place. The standard methods are given in ISO 868 (Shore) [6] and ISO 2039 (Ball indentation and Rockwell) [7]. However, Vickers microhardness is more satisfactory for monitoring degradation of rigid materials. 

There are no mathematical correlations between the various methods. Figure 3.6 displays examples for Rockwell M and Shore D. 

ISO 7267-2 1986 Rubber-covered rollers - Determination of apparent hardness - Part 2 Shore-type durometer method... 

ISO 7619-1 2004 Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic - Determination of indentation hardness - Part 1 Durometer method (Shore hardness)... 

The most familiar estimation procedure is to assume that the population mean and variance are equal to the sample mean and variance. More generally, the method of moments (MOM) approach is to equate sample moments (mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis) to the corresponding population. Software such as Crystal Ball (Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, CA) uses MOM to fit the gamma and beta distributions (see also Johnson et al. 1994). Use of higher moments is exemplified by fitting of the... 

There are three ways to safe a trench The first method is to slope to the angle of repose the second is benching and the third is shoring. The first two are accomplished with backhoes and live workers, the third with well-trained and organized rescuers. 

The reduction schemes used by Tang et al. [20] to define the surrogate fewer state system follows the method proposed by Shore [62]. The scheme has a compact form when we introduce two orthogonal projection operators P and Q and work in the frequency domain instead of the time domain. The time evolution matrix for the n-state system dynamics, U(f). and its Fourier transform, G(w), satisfy the following equations ... 

---