Shape selectivity phase characterization

Separations of PAH isomers by shape-selective phases are useful if the sample contains compounds within a limited number of aromatic rings, otherwise the sample becomes too complex to analyze because molecules with different ring sizes coelute. This makes identification of the components difficult even when selective fluorescence detectors are used. Multidimensional LC should be applied in cases where it is necessary to characterize completely all the components of a complex polyaromatic compound mixture. Normal-phase LC on polar bonded silica gives eluent fractions consisting of molecules with similar numbers of pi-electrons. These can then be further separated on a monomeric-type reversed-phase column into different isomer types. Finally, a shape-selective polymeric Cig reversed-phase column (or liquid crystal coliunn in capillary GC) may be used to separate the specific PAH isomers that differ in planarity and Ub) ratios. Two-dimensional LC is a powerful tool for the separation of PAHs in complex environmental samples because of the higher peak capacity than single coliunn LC. 

A complete review of spectroscopic methods applied to the analysis of alkyl-modified surfaces with a comprehensive list of spectroscopic indicators of alkyl chain conformational order is provided elsewhere [9] this review will focus on the application of spectroscopic and other relevant experimental techniques for the characterization of shape-selective chromatographic materials. On the whole, it has been observed experimentally that any increase in alkyl stationary-phase conformational order promotes an increase in selectivity for shape-constrained solutes in RPLC separations [9], As a complement to the wealth of spectroscopic and chromatographic data, the use of molecular simulation techniques to visualize and characterize alkyl-modified surfaces may also provide new insights into molecular-level features that control shape selectivity. A review of progress in the field of chromatographic material simulations will also be discussed. 

RPLC processes has been questioned [203,224]. It is important to recognize that a substitute of solvent for a larger model with a greater number of alkyl chains was deemed necessary to provide adequate resolution of local phase structural changes and thus the characterization of potentially important features within chromatographic phases that represent shape-selective materials. 

In comparing the various test procedures, there is always a good agreement found for hydrophobic retention and selectivity as well as for shape selectivity. However, the characterization of silanophilic interaction is still a matter of discussion. In part, the differences are due to the selection of the basic analyte. Therefore, the outcome of every test is different. It has been shown, that the peak asymmetry—used for detection of silanophilic interactions—does not correlate to the pA" value of the basic test solute [64]. A closer look at these data leads to the assumption, that the differences are related to the structure of the basic solute, irrespective of whether a primary, secondary, or a tertiary amine is used. The presence of NH bonds seems to be more important in stationary-phase differentiation than the basicity expressed by the pA value. For comparable test procedures for silanophilic interactions further studies seem to be required. 

Nevertheless, the best overall characterization of a reversed-phase bonded phase is done by well-designed chromatographic tests. Such a test should enable us to chai erize at least the hydrophobidty (retentivity) of a packing and the activity of the residual silanols. As we will see, tests can also be designed to characterize the shape selectivity ot a packing or its behavior toward complexing agents. 

The steric parameter S reflects the resistance of the stationary phase to undergo insertion of solute molectdes with a higher thickness . It exhibits very similar correlations with stationary phase properties such as the hydrophobicity parameter H. However, the S parameter cannot be related to the soshape-selectivity parameter defined by Sander and Wise [22-24], which describes the ability of phases to differentiate between planar and twisted polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). These two parameters do not correlate at all and obviously characterize very different properties. 

Another informative test mixture is that described by Tanaka [43], in which selectivity between triphenylene (TRI) and o-terphenyl (o-TER) is used to characterize the shape recognition capability of LC stationary phases. The primary difference between these two solutes is their planarity TRI is a planar PAH and o-TER possesses... 

---