Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Self diffusivity, concentration

A rapid increase in diffusivity in the saturation region is therefore to be expected, as illustrated in Figure 7 (17). Although the corrected diffusivity (Dq) is, in principle, concentration dependent, the concentration dependence of this quantity is generally much weaker than that of the thermodynamic correction factor d ap d a q). The assumption of a constant corrected diffusivity is therefore an acceptable approximation for many systems. More detailed analysis shows that the corrected diffusivity is closely related to the self-diffusivity or tracer diffusivity, and at low sorbate concentrations these quantities become identical. [Pg.258]

Theoretical studies of diffusion aim to predict the distribution profile of an exposed substrate given the known process parameters of concentration, temperature, crystal orientation, dopant properties, etc. On an atomic level, diffusion of a dopant in a siUcon crystal is caused by the movement of the introduced element that is allowed by the available vacancies or defects in the crystal. Both host atoms and impurity atoms can enter vacancies. Movement of a host atom from one lattice site to a vacancy is called self-diffusion. The same movement by a dopant is called impurity diffusion. If an atom does not form a covalent bond with siUcon, the atom can occupy in interstitial site and then subsequently displace a lattice-site atom. This latter movement is beheved to be the dominant mechanism for diffusion of the common dopant atoms, P, B, As, and Sb (26). [Pg.349]

Tracer Diffusivity Tracer diffusivity, denoted by D g is related to both mutual and self-diffusivity. It is evaluated in the presence of a second component B, again using a tagged isotope of the first component. In the dilute range, tagging A merely provides a convenient method for indirect composition analysis. As concentration varies, tracer diffusivities approach mutual diffusivities at the dilute limit, and they approach selr-diffusivities at the pure component limit. That is, at the limit of dilute A in B, D g D°g and... [Pg.592]

Many more correlations are available for diffusion coefficients in the liquid phase than for the gas phase. Most, however, are restiicied to binary diffusion at infinite dilution D°s of lo self-diffusivity D -. This reflects the much greater complexity of liquids on a molecular level. For example, gas-phase diffusion exhibits neghgible composition effects and deviations from thermodynamic ideahty. Conversely, liquid-phase diffusion almost always involves volumetiic and thermodynamic effects due to composition variations. For concentrations greater than a few mole percent of A and B, corrections are needed to obtain the true diffusivity. Furthermore, there are many conditions that do not fit any of the correlations presented here. Thus, careful consideration is needed to produce a reasonable estimate. Again, if diffusivity data are available at the conditions of interest, then they are strongly preferred over the predictions of any correlations. [Pg.596]

The diffusion coefficients of the constituent ions in ionic liquids have most commonly been measured either by electrochemical or by NMR methods. These two methods in fact measure slightly different diffusional properties. The electrochemical methods measure the diffusion coefficient of an ion in the presence of a concentration gradient (Pick diffusion) [59], while the NMR methods measure the diffusion coefficient of an ion in the absence of any concentration gradients (self-diffusion) [60]. Fortunately, under most circumstances these two types of diffusion coefficients are roughly equivalent. [Pg.119]

This formula for ki can be cast into another form by using equations 1.169 and 1.170. We note first that in these latter equations K is the concentration of defects in CujO at 1 atm pressure of oxygen, so that (A ),Q) is the self-diffusion coefficient of Cu in CujO at this oxygen pressure. Call this self-diffusion coefficient Z7 , then... [Pg.258]

It must be noted that the values of Dq and E are influenced by the concentration of the solute metal and also by the presence of alloying elements in the solvent. It has also been shown that the diffusion coefficient for a given solute is in inverse proportion to the melting point of the solvent. D is least for metals forming continuous series of solid solutions and for self-diffusion. [Pg.399]

The beauty of the reptation model is that it is able to make predictions about molecular flow both in solution and at fracture by assuming that the molecules undergo the same kind of motions in each case. For both self-diffusion in concentrated solutions and at fracture, the force to overcome in pulling the polymer molecule through the tube is assumed to be frictional. [Pg.75]

While the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique has widely been used to study diffusion processes of normal liquids, solids, or colloidal systems, there are only a few applications to molten salts. The spin echo self-diffusion method with pulsed field gradients was applied to molten salts by Herdlicka et al. "" There is no need to set up or maintain a concentration gradient. [Pg.162]

Rymden, R. Stilbs, P. (1985b). Concentration and molecular weight dependence of counterion self-diffusion in aqueous poly(acrylic acid) solutions. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 89, 3502-5. [Pg.88]

Table 5, Average polymer chain concentration (ape), polymer swellability (S), rotational correlation times of TEMPONE (r) and self-diffusion coefficient of methanol (Zf) in the swollen 2,2% Pd catalysts. Table 5, Average polymer chain concentration (ape), polymer swellability (S), rotational correlation times of TEMPONE (r) and self-diffusion coefficient of methanol (Zf) in the swollen 2,2% Pd catalysts.
FIG. 9 Measured self-diffusion coefficients at 25°C for toluene (A), water ( ), acrylamide ( , and AOT ( ) in water, toluene, and AOT reverse microemulsions as a function of cosurfactant (acrylamide) concentration, f (wt%). The breakpoint at about 1.2% acrylamide approximately denotes, the onset of percolation in electrical conductivity. [Pg.261]

Fig.3.1.9 (a) The adsorption-desorption isotherm (circles, right axis) and the self-diffusion coefficients D (triangles, left axis) for cyclohexane in porous silicon with 3.6-nm pore diameter as a function of the relative vapor pressure z = P/PS1 where Ps is the saturated vapor pressure, (b) The self-diffusion coefficients D for acetone (squares) and cyclohexane (triangles) as a function of the concentration 0 of molecules in pores measured on the adsorption (open symbols) and the desorption (filled symbols) branches. [Pg.244]

NMR Self-Diffusion of Desmopressin. The NMR-diffusion technique (3,10) offers a convenient way to measure the translational self-diffusion coefficient of molecules in solution and in isotropic liquid crystalline phases. The technique is nonperturbing, in that it does not require the addition of foreign probe molecules or the creation of a concentration-gradient in the sample it is direct in that it does not involve any model dependent assumptions. Obstruction by objects much smaller than the molecular root-mean-square displacement during A (approx 1 pm), lead to a reduced apparent diffusion coefficient in equation (1) (10). Thus, the NMR-diffusion technique offers a fruitful way to study molecular interactions in liquids (11) and the phase structure of liquid crystalline phases (11,12). [Pg.256]

Diffusion in solution is the process whereby ionic or molecular constituents move under the influence of their kinetic activity in the direction of their concentration gradient. The process of diffusion is often known as self-diffusion, molecular diffusion, or ionic diffusion. The mass of diffusing substance passing through a given cross section per unit time is proportional to the concentration gradient (Fick s first law). [Pg.48]

Molecular diffusion (or self-diffusion) is the process by which molecules show a net migration, most commonly from areas of high to low concentration, as a result of their thermal vibration, or Brownian motion. The majority of reactive transport models are designed to simulate the distribution of reactions in groundwater flows and, as such, the accounting for molecular diffusion is lumped with hydrodynamic dispersion, in the definition of the dispersivity. [Pg.291]

FIG. 26 Observed water self-diffusion coefficients as a function of the protein concentration (g protein/g water) for micellar casein dispersions ( ), for acid gels (O), and for rennet gels ( ) [reproduced with permission from Mariette et al (2002)]. [Pg.55]

These experiments suggest that as the long time self-diffusion coefficient approaches zero the relaxation time becomes infinite, suggesting an elastic structure. In an important study of the diffusion coefficients for a wide range of concentrations, Ottewill and Williams14 showed that it does indeed reduce toward zero as the hard sphere transition is approached. This is shown in Figure 5.6, where the ratio of the long time diffusion coefficient to the diffusion coefficient in the dilute limit is plotted as a function of concentration. [Pg.158]

Therefore we expect Df, identified as the fast diffusion coefficient measured in dynamic light-scattering experiments, in infinitely dilute polyelectrolyte solutions to be very high at low salt concentrations and to decrease to self-diffusion coefficient D KRg 1) as the salt concentration is increased. The above result for KRg 1 limit is analogous to the Nernst-Hartley equation reported in Ref. 33. The theory described here accounts for stmctural correlations inside poly electrolyte chains. [Pg.54]

Nafion absorbs MeOH more selectively than water, and the MeOH diffusion flow is higher than the osmotic water flow in Nafion membranes. Diffusion coefficients of Nafion 117 determined by different techniques have been reported. Ren et al. measured MeOH diffusion coefficients in Nafion 117 membranes exposed to 1.0 M MeOH solutions using pulsed field gradient (PPG) NMR techniques. The MeOH self-diffusion coefficient was 6 x 10 cm S and roughly independent of concentration over the range of 0.5-8.0 M at 30°C. A similar diffusion coefficient was obtained for Nafion 117 at 22°C by Hietala, Maunu, and Sundholm with the same technique. Kauranen and Skou determined the MeOH diffusion coefficient of 4.9 x 10 cm for Nafion... [Pg.123]

Equation (2) implies that the concentration C x,y,z) in a certain point x,y,z) can change in time only when the second derivatives of C with respect to X, y or z are all not zero. Equation (2) cannot be used as such for the description of self-diffusion, since self-diffusion even occurs when the macroscopic concentration is the same everywhere in the system. [Pg.204]

At low Q the experiments measure the collective diffusion coefficient D. of concentration fluctuations. Due to the repulsive interaction the effective diffusion increases 1/S(Q). Well beyond the interaction peak at high Q, where S(Q)=1, the measured diffusion tends to become equal to the self-diffusion D. A hydrodynamics factor H(Q) describes the additional effects on D ff=DaH(Q)/S Q) due to hydrodynamics interactions (see e.g. [342]). Variations of D(Q)S(Q) with Q (Fig. 6.28) may be attributed to the modulation with H(Q) displaying a peak, where S(Q) also has its maximum. For the transport in a crowded solution inside a cell the self-diffusion coefficient is the relevant parameter. It is strongly... [Pg.201]

In that case the self diffusion coefficient - concentration curve shows a behaviour distinctly different from the cosurfactant microemulsions. has a quite low value throughout the extension of the isotropic solution phase up to the highest water content. This implies that a model with closed droplets surrounded by surfactant emions in a hydrocarbon medium gives an adequate description of these solutions, found to be significantly higher them D, the conclusion that a non-negligible eimount of water must exist between the emulsion droplets. [Pg.169]

Millet determined self-diffusion coefficients for Na and Cs+ ions in hydrated 1200 EW membranes using conductivity measurements and the Einstein equation, D+ = u+kT, where u+ is the absolute mobility of the given cation. u+ can be derived from the equivalent conductivity according to A = 0+IC+ = Fu+, where 0+ is the specific conductivity, C+ is the cation concentration (calculated on the basis of the dry membrane density, EW, and the water content), and F is the Faraday constant. The values of D+ determined via these conductivity measurements... [Pg.332]


See other pages where Self diffusivity, concentration is mentioned: [Pg.55]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.577]    [Pg.583]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.417]   


SEARCH



Critical micelle concentration self-diffusion NMR

Diffusion concentration

Self diffusivity, concentration dependence

Self-concentration

Self-diffusion

Self-diffusion coefficient concentrated solutions

Self-diffusion probe concentration

Self-diffusivities

Self-diffusivity

© 2024 chempedia.info