Sedimentation time derivative analysis

The simplest way computationally of obtaining a sedimentation coefficient distribution is from time derivative analysis of the evolving concentration distribution profile across the cell [40,41]. The time derivative at each radial position r is d c r,t)/co /dt)r where cq is the initial loading concentration. Assuming that a sufficiently small time integral of scans are chosen so that Ac r t)/At= dc r t)ldt the apparent weight fraction distribution function g (s) n.b. sometimes written as (s ) can be calculated... 

Rgure 5 Time derivative analysis for a sample mixture of two species. The rate of change of the concentration profile is approximated from the difference between scans, and transformed into a plot showing the distribution of sedimentation coefficients in the sample. 

Selected entries from Methods in Enzymology [vol, page(s)j Boundary analysis [baseline correction, 240, 479, 485-486, 492, 501 second moment, 240, 482-483 time derivative, 240, 479, 485-486, 492, 501 transport method, 240, 483-486] computation of sedimentation coefficient distribution functions, 240, 492-497 diffusion effects, correction [differential distribution functions, 240, 500-501 integral distribution functions, 240, 501] weight average sedimentation coefficient estimation, 240, 497, 499-500. 

The radial concentration scans obtained from the UV spectrophotometer of the analytical ultracentrifuge can be either converted to a radial derivative of the concentrations at a given instant of time (dc/dr)t or to the time derivative of the concentrations at fixed radial position (dc/dt)r (Stafford, 1992). The dcf dt method, as the name implies, uses the temporal derivative which results in elimination of time independent (random) sources of noise in the data, thereby greatly increasing the precision of sedimentation boundary analysis (Stafford, 1992). Numerically, this process is implemented by subtracting pairs of radial concentration scans obtained at uniformly and closely spaced time intervals c2 — G)/( 2 — h)]. The values are then plotted as a function of radius to obtain (dc/dt) f versus r curves (Stafford, 1994). It can be shown that the apparent sedimentation coefficient s ... 

Stafford, W. F. III. (1992). Boundary analysis in sedimentation transport experiments A procedure for obtaining sedimentation coefficient distributions using the time derivative of the concentration profile. Anal. Biochem. 203(2), 295-301. 

Stafford, W. F. (1992a). Boundary Analysis in Sedimentation Transport Experiments A Procedure for Obtaining Sedimentation Coefficient Distributions Using the Time Derivative of the Concentration Profile. Anal. Biochem. 203, 295-301. 

An extended analysis of data using the time-derivative method provides for simultaneous determination of apparent sedimentation, and apparent diffusion coefficient, values at a particular concentration and temperature [9]. The apparent diffusion coefficient was calculated from the apparent sedimentation coefficient distribution by the following relationship ... 

A sensitive method for primary amines is shown in reaction 2, leading to the corresponding 7V-benzenesulfonyl-/V-trifluoroacetyl derivatives. These can be determined by GC-ECD using SE-30 columns LOD 1-5 pg, which is about 200 times more sensitive than GC-FID. The method was applied for determination of phenethylamine (33) in urine110. This analysis was performed also by LLE into n-pentane, derivatization to the benzenesulfonamide and GC-FPD using a capillary column recoveries of aliphatic primary amines in urine were 91-107%, RSD 0.2-4.5%111,112. Amines in environmental waters and sediments were determined after LLE with dichloromethane, derivatization with benzenesulfonyl chloride and GC-SIM-MS LOD 0.02-2 pg/L of water and 0.5-50 ng/g of sediment113. 

The QuEChERS method was invented and described for the first time in 2003 by Anastassiades et al. [98] as a fast, simple, inexpensive, and convenient preparation procedure for fruit and vegetable samples used for pesticide multiresidue analysis. Currently, this methodology is used for determinations of pesticides, pesticide residues, and other compounds of environmental concern such as phenol derivatives, perfluorinated compounds, and chlorinated hydrocarbons pharmaceutical compounds in food and agricultural matrices and environmental samples such as soil, sediments, and water (see for example [99-102]). 

Considerable effort has been applied to the analysis of the hydrocarbon content of non-oil-bearing sediments and rocks. Recent non-reservoir sediments may contain 30 to 60 ppm hydrocarbons, whilst the levels in non-reservoir ancient sediments may increase to 300 ppm, probably due to seepage (up) from reservoir sediments over the course of geological time. Studies have centred on three broad, ill-defined classes of material soil waxes—the organic material extracted by ether or benzene-methanol mixtures from very recent deposits (e.g. soils), bitumens—the material similarly extracted from sedimentary fossiliferous rocks or shales and kerogens—the organic material in shales and older sediments that is insoluble in the commonly used petroleum solvents and is probably derived from lignin. 

Rgure 4 Van Holde-Weischet analysis for a sample mixture of two species. (A) Extrapolation plot. Each vertical array of points corresponds to a boundary obtained at the same time during the run, and straight lines are fitted to the points derived from similar portions of the boundary at different times. Extrapolation to the axis, or infinite time, eliminates the effects of diffusion. (B) Integral sedimentation coefficient, or G(s), distribution representing the same data. 

---