Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sediment recommended indicators

Free ionic silver readily forms soluble complexes or insoluble materials with dissolved and suspended material present in natural waters, such as sediments and sulfide ions (44). The hardness of water is sometimes used as an indicator of its complex-forming capacity. Because of the direct relationship between the availabiUty of free silver ions and adverse environmental effects, the 1980 ambient freshwater criterion for the protection of aquatic life is expressed as a function of the hardness of the water in question. The maximum recommended concentration of total recoverable silver, in fresh water is thus given by the following expression (45) in Fg/L. [Pg.92]

Recommended criteria for sediment and water indicators for monitoring responses to change in mercury loading 3 CfQ... [Pg.53]

It is recommended to carry out a set of SV measurements of the unfolded and the folded state ensembles as a function of RNA concentration as described earlier before collecting the data points for the entire equilibrium transition. The shape of the apparent sedimentation coefficient distribution curves (discussed in Section 5) derived from such measurements, indicate whether the initial and the final states are conformationally homogeneous. Appearance of more than one peak in such distributions would indicate the existence of distinct structural states with different hydrodynamic properties. [Pg.220]

The two terms in the right side of equation 35 are indicated on a typical sedimentation curve as shown in Figure 32. Both equations 35 and 36 can be used to find M(f). The most obvious method is to tabulate t and P(t) and thereby derive dP(t), dt, and finally M(t) (cumulative oversize percentage) versus Dp(t) (equation 32). Equation 36 is recommended in suspensions of particles having a wide size distribution. [Pg.97]

An extensive literature exists on the disturbance caused by the size and shape of the sampler. Hvorslev (1949) produced a treatise on this topic which is still of practical value. In his treatise, he discussed the forces and sediment deformations involved in drive samplers and define the principal dimensions which are relevant to disturbance and shown in Figure 5.15. A summary of the characteristics of various corers with reference to several recommended design criteria is presented in Tables 5.4 and 5.5. A review indicates that there is a gross discrepancy between theory and practice. [Pg.148]

Recent tests by other workers Gust et al, 1994) seem to indicate that the flow around and inside sediment traps may have considerable effects on the trap collection efficiency at shallow depths, whereas the deep-ocean traps appear to collect the actual flux. We recommend, therefore, to equip the instruments with current meters, and depth and tilt sensors. This allows a description of the dynamics of the hydrographical field and its effects on mooring line motions as well as on the excursions of traps from the vertical position, and may even offer the basis for corrections of hydrodynamic biases in particle flux measurements. [Pg.20]

Large-scale performance tests have been developed to simulate expected field conditions to report performance properties of as-instaUed ECPs and SRDs. Standardized, large-scale tests have been developed for slope and channel erosion, as well as for several sediment retention applications. Products are installed per the product manufacturer s published installation recommendations. The results of these tests indicate actual field performance and are acceptable for use in performance specifications and often in design calculations. [Pg.546]

This evaluation criterion indicates when the effect of the strategy on natural resources (criteria pollutant air emissions, surface water, groundwater, sediment, wetlands, floodplains, undeveloped lands, etc.) is to increase or decrease the their depletion (e.g., additional make-up water may be needed for a recommended building cooling technology). A thumb-down indicates adverse effect, whereas a thumb-up represents beneficial impact based on professional judgment ... [Pg.22]


See other pages where Sediment recommended indicators is mentioned: [Pg.2215]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.1394]    [Pg.1394]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.1971]    [Pg.2458]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.764]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.2439]    [Pg.2219]    [Pg.733]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.797]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.87]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.52 , Pg.53 ]




SEARCH



Sediment indicators

© 2024 chempedia.info