Scrubbing system

The most popiilar dry scrubbing systems for incinerators have involved the spray drying of hme slurries, followed by dry coUection in electrostatic precipitators or fabric filters. Moller and Christiansen [Air Poll. Cout. Assoc. 84-9.5 (1984)] published data on early European technology. Moller et al. [U.S. Patent no. 4,889,698 (1989)] describe the newer extension of that technology to include both spray-dryer absorption and dry scrubbing with powdered, activated carbon injection. They claim greatly improved removal of mercury, dioxins, and NOx. 

Optimized modern dry scrubbing systems for incinerator gas cleaning are much more effective (and expensive) than their counterparts used so far for utility boiler flue gas cleaning. Brinckman and Maresca [ASME Med. Waste Symp. (1992)] describe the use of dry hydrated lime or sodium bicarbonate injection followed by membrane filtration as preferred treatment technology for control of acid gas and particulate matter emissions from modular medical waste incinerators, which have especially high dioxin emissions. 

Drawing reaction Provide empty vessel between vacuum source or mixture into scrubbing system and reaction vessel to act as... 

Since power is a substantial component of the fixed operating cost of a unit, the operating cost would run approximately seven times more on a scrubber installation. The installation costs of a hot-rolled steel precipitator to handle 100,000 cfm would be between 3.50 and 4.50/cfm as opposed to 1.40 to 1.80/cfm for a venturi scrubbing system. Although the initial capital expenditure is high for the precipitator, if the total operating and capital costs are amortized over an acceptable period of time, 8 to 10 years, the precipitator will prove to be the. lore economically feasible choice because of its low operating and maintenance costs. 

Condensation scrubbing systems are a relatively new technology and are not yet generally commercially available. It may be argued that this is a pollution prevention type of technology since it replaces other approaches to controlling very fine PM, although the primary role is end-of-pipe treatment. 

The immediate cause of the disaster was the contamination of an MIC storage tank by several tons of water and chloroform. A runaway reaction occurred, and the temperature and pressure rose. The relief valve lifted, and MIC vapor was discharged to atmosphere. The protective equipment, which should have prevented or minimized the release, was out of order or not in full working order the refrigeration system that should have cooled the storage tank was shut down, the scrubbing system that should have absorbed the vapor was not immediately available, and the flare system that should have burned any vapor that got past the scrubbing system was out of use. 

The other category of latent failures can occur at the level of engineering design or management policy. For example, the design of a scrubbing system... 

Gilbert, W., Selecting Materials For Wet Scrubbing Systems, Pollution Engineering, Aug. 1973, p. 28. 

To prompt inhibitor addition to a gas scrubbing system solution prone to cause stress-corrosion cracking of carbon steel when the potential moves towards a value at which stress-corrosion cracking is known to occur. 

When viewing effluent treatment methods, it is clear that the basic problem of disposing safely of waste material is, in many cases, not so much solved but moved from one place to another. If a method of treatment can be used that allows material to be recycled, then the waste problem is truly solved. However, if the treatment simply concentrates the waste as concentrated liquid, slurry or solid in a form, which cannot be recycled, then it will still need to be disposed of. Landfill disposal of such waste is increasingly unacceptable and thermal oxidation causes pollution through products of combustion and liquors from scrubbing systems. The best method for dealing with effluent problems is to solve the problem at source by waste minimization, as will be discussed in Chapter 28. 

Scrubbing systems must not be required to treat the air before exhaust into the environment. 

Traditionally, processes have used a single destruction technique, and this has historically been the case also for HYDECAT . Thus, nearly all installed processes treat the waste hypochlorite at the concentration it exits the scrubbing system down to concentrations suitable for discharge (Fig. 26.2). The key aspect in the re-evaluation described herein is to question the practices of firstly single technology and secondly end-of-pipe treatment the destruction of the hypochlorite exclusively in the blowdown stream from the scrubber. That is, it is questioned whether installation of a single treatment technique solely to process the effluent at its natural concentration from the scrubber loop is necessarily the best process option. This chapter will consider the two parts of the question paraphrased above sequentially. 

An increase in magnesium concentration from 100 to 1000 m-mole/1 increases pS02 by about a factor of two. Most limestone scrubbing systems with magnesium enhancement would operate midway between these magnesium concentrations, about 200-400 m-mole/1. 

The main purpose of magnesia addition to a limestone wet scrubbing system is to facilitate high S02 removal. For a wet scrubber that cleans flue gas from a utility coal-fired boiler, the scrubber inlet gas S02 concentration is typically about 700 ppm by volume per one weight percent sulfur in the fired coal. For sub-bituminous coal having only 0.7 weight percent sulfur content, the inlet S02 concentration is about 500 ppm, and, for example, the outlet S02 has to be less than 50 ppm to achieve 90 percent removal. In order to avoid serious inhibition of mass transfer because of S02 back-pressure, the equilibrium S02 partial pressure should be about four or more times lower than the actual S02 partial pressure in the gas. Thus, Figure 3 indicates that for this low-sulfur coal system, the scrubber inlet pH should be at least 5.5, and the outlet pH at least... 

Dissolved sulfite concentration is a convenient basis for comparing 1imestone/magnesia scrubbing to other types of flue gas wet scrubbing systems. 

AEA also concluded that the agent offgas/scrubbing systems could be fabricated from stainless steel, while the agent anolyte and catholyte circuits should be lined with materials resistant to corrosion by free fluoride, e.g., PTFE or PFA. 

---