Multiconfiguration SCF

The MC SCF (Multiconfiguration Self Consistent Field) method is similar to the Cl scheme, but we vary not only the coefficients in front of the Slater determinants, but also the Slater determinants themselves (changing the analytical form of the orbitals in them). We have learnt about two versions the classic one (we optimize alternatively coefficients of Slater determinants and the orbitals) and a unitary one (we optimize simultaneously the determinantal coefficients and orbitals). 

QCISD(T) = quadratic Cl including single, double, and triple excitations, UCCD(ST) = coupled-cluster doubles method based on the unrestricted Hartree-Fock method and corrected for single and triple replacements, MC SCF = multiconfiguration SCF, MRD Cl = multireference singles and doubles Cl, MBPT= many-body perturbation theory, SD Cl = singles and doubles Cl. 

QDMBPT = quasi-degenerate many-body perturbation theory, (POL-) Cl = (polarization-) configuration interaction, MC SCF = multiconfiguration SCF, CAS SCF = complete active space SCF, MRD Cl = multireference double-excitation Cl, UHF = unrestricted Hartree-Fock, UMP2 = unrestricted Moller-Plesset perturbation method of second order. - An analytical, combined polynomial-exponential form for E(x) with x = (r-rg)/r and a figure for x= —0.98 to +0.04. 

Variational methods such as the self-consistent field (SCF), multiconfigurational self-consistent field (MCSGF) or full configuration interaction (full Cl) methods, where the energy is calculated as an expectation value... 

Solutions to the eigenvalue equation (16) can be obtained by any of the standard quantum chemical methods, such as Hartree-Fock SCF, multiconfiguration SCF (MCSCF), Mpller-Plesset perturbation, coupled cluster, or density functional theories. The matrix elements of Hr, a one-electron operator, are readily computed, thus formally the inclusion of solvent effects in the quantum mechanical description of the solute molecule appears quite simple. Moreover, gradients of the eigenvalue E are readily computed. 

In this exercise, we will introduce the Complete Active Space Multiconfiguration SCF (CASSCF) method, using it to compute the excitation energy for the first excited state of acrolein (a singlet). The CIS job we ran in Exercise 9.3 predicted an excitation energy of 4.437 eV, which is rather for from the experimental value of 3.72 eV. We ll try to improve this prediction here. 

H. B. Gray Multiconfiguration SCF calculations by P. J. Hay indicate that the 166 -366 energy separation is over 1 eV, and there is no evidence for intervening states that could provide a facile intersystem pathway. Thus a relatively small singlet triplet intersystem crossing rate constant is not all that peculiar. 

When the HF wave function gives a very poor description of the system, i.e. when nondynamical electron correlation is important, the multiconfigurational SCF (MCSCF) method is used. This method is based on a Cl expansion of the wave function in which both the coefficients of the Cl and those of the molecular orbitals are variationally determined. The most common approach is the Complete Active Space SCF (CASSCF) scheme, where the user selects the chemically important molecular orbitals (active space), within which a full Cl is done. 

The various response tensors are identified as terms in these series and are calculated using numerical derivatives of the energy. This method is easily implemented at any level of theory. Analytic derivative methods have been implemented using self-consistent-field (SCF) methods for a, ft and y, using multiconfiguration SCF (MCSCF) methods for ft and using second-order perturbation theory (MP2) for y". The response properties can also be determined in terms of sum-over-states formulation, which is derived from a perturbation theory treatment of the field operator — [iE, which in the static limit is equivalent to the results obtained by SCF finite field or analytic derivative methods. 

Roos, B. J. (1992) The multiconfigurational (MC) self-consistent field (SCF) theory,in Roos, B. J.(eds.), Lecture notes in quantum chemistry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,pp. 179-254. 

An example of a multireference technique is the multiconfigurational SCF (MCSCF) approach, where the wave function is obtained by simultaneously optimizing both the molecular orbitals and the configuration coefficients, thereby blending the different resonance structures together. [28] Historically, the MCSCF approach has been used extensively to provide qualitatively accurate representations of surfaces however, this method still suffers two primary drawbacks (1) the ambiguous choice of configurations and (2) the lack of dynamical correlation. 

However, until today no systematic comparison of methods based on MpUer-Plesset perturbation (MP) and Coupled Cluster theory, the SOPPA or multiconfigurational linear response theory has been presented. The present study is a first attempt to remedy this situation. Calculations of the rotational g factor of HF, H2O, NH3 and CH4 were carried out at the level of Hartree-Fock (SCF) and multiconfigurational Hartree-Fock (MCSCF) linear response theory, the SOPPA and SOPPA(CCSD) [40], MpUer-Plesset perturbation theory to second (MP2), third (MP3) and fourth order without the triples contributions (MP4SDQ) and finally coupled cluster singles and doubles theory. The same basis sets and geometries were employed in all calculations for a given molecule. The results obtained with the different methods are therefore for the first time direct comparable and consistent conclusions about the performance of the different methods can be made. 

We have already presented [17,18] the SCF-Ml (Self Consistent Field for Molecular Interactions) method, based on the idea that BSSE can be avoided a priori provided the MOs of each fragment are expanded only using basis functions located on each subsystem. In the present work we propose a multiconfiguration extension (MCSCF-MI) of the same technique, particularly suited to deal with systems for which proton transfer processes must be considered. 

The calculations are not all at exactly the same bond length R. The basis set is indicated after the slash in the method. R, L, C, and T are basis sets of Slater-type functions. The aug-cc-pVDZ and aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets [360] are composed of Gaussian functions. SCF stands for self-consistent-field MC, for multiconfiguration FO, for first-order Cl, for configuration interaction MR, for multireference MPn, for nth-order Mpller-Plesset perturbation theory and SDQ, for singles, doubles, and quadruples. 

The Section on More Quantitive Aspects of Electronic Structure Calculations introduces many of the computational chemistry methods that are used to quantitatively evaluate molecular orbital and configuration mixing amplitudes. The Hartree-Fock self-consistent field (SCF), configuration interaction (Cl), multiconfigurational SCF (MCSCF), many-body and Mpller-Plesset perturbation theories,... 

The Cl procedure just described uses a fixed set of orbitals in the functions An alternative approach is to vary the forms of the MOs in each determinantal function O, in (1.300), in addition to varying the coefficients c,. One uses an iterative process (which resembles the Hartree-Fock procedure) to find the optimum orbitals in the Cl determinants. This form of Cl is called the multiconfiguration SCF (MCSCF) method. Because the orbitals are optimized, the MCSCF method requires far fewer configurations than ordinary Cl to get an accurate wave function. A particular form of the MCSCF approach developed for calculations on diatomic molecules is the optimized valence configuration (OVC) method. 

The standard method for selecting the 4>j is to ask for the <)>i which maximize the importance of one or more terms in the sum. This gives the self-consistent-field (SCF) or multiconfiguration SCF (MC-SCF) equations. If each < >. is expanded as a linear combination of some fixed set of basis functions f - the coefficients can be found by an extension of the Roothaan SCF equations. 

---